Literature DB >> 35475183

Widespread occurrence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Ontario, Canada, and predicted habitat suitability for the emerging Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans.

Lauren Crawshaw1, Tore Buchanan1, Leonard Shirose2,3, Amanda Palahnuk1, Hugh Y Cai4, Amanda M Bennett5, Claire M Jardine2,3, Christina M Davy1,5.   

Abstract

Chytridiomycosis, caused by the fungi Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans, is associated with massive amphibian mortality events worldwide and with some species' extinctions. Previous ecological niche models suggest that B. dendrobatidis is not well-suited to northern, temperate climates, but these predictions have often relied on datasets in which northern latitudes are underrepresented. Recent northern detections of B. dendrobatidis suggest that these models may have underestimated the suitability of higher latitudes for this fungus. We used qPCR to test for B. dendrobatidis in 1,041 non-invasive epithelial swab samples from 18 species of amphibians collected across 735,345 km2 in Ontario and Akimiski Island (Nunavut), Canada. We detected the pathogen in 113 samples (10.9%) from 11 species. Only one specimen exhibited potential clinical signs of disease. We used these data to produce six Species Distribution Models of B. dendrobatidis, which classified half of the study area as potential habitat for the fungus. We also tested each sample for B. salamandrivorans, an emerging pathogen that is causing alarming declines in European salamanders, but is not yet detected in North America. We did not detect B. salamandrivorans in any of the samples, providing a baseline for future surveillance. We assessed the potential risk of future introduction by comparing salamander richness to temperature-dependent mortality, predicted by a previous exposure study. Areas with the highest species diversity and predicted mortality risk extended 60,530 km2 across southern Ontario, highlighting the potential threat B. salamandrivorans poses to northern Nearctic amphibians. Preventing initial introduction will require coordinated, transboundary regulation of trade in amphibians (including frogs that can carry and disperse B. salamandrivorans), and surveillance of the pathways of introduction (e.g., water and wildlife). Our results can inform surveillance for both pathogens and efforts to mitigate the spread of chytridiomycosis through wild populations.
© 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amphibian conservation; chytridiomycosis; emerging infectious diseases; fungal pathogens; niche modeling; species distribution modeling

Year:  2022        PMID: 35475183      PMCID: PMC9020443          DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2045-7758            Impact factor:   3.167


INTRODUCTION

Increased prevalence of fungal pathogens threatens global biodiversity, agriculture, and human health (Fisher et al., 2012; Lötters et al., 2010). The pathogenic fungi that cause chytridiomycosis (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) and B. salamandrivorans (Bsal)) are a well‐known example of this trend. Bd affects a wide range of amphibians and is associated with population declines and even extinction of some species (Lötters et al., 2010). The origins of Bd are enigmatic (Rosenblum et al., 2013). Southern Africa and eastern North America were initially proposed as the potential sources of this pathogen (Fisher et al., 2009; Ouellet et al., 2005), but more recent evidence suggests a common ancestral lineage in East Asia (Fisher & Garner, 2020; O’Hanlon et al., 2018). Bd now has an almost global distribution and is treated as a potentially invasive species across its contemporary range. The related, recently discovered “salamander chytrid” Bsal is endemic to south‐east Asia but recently spread outside its native range. Bsal was introduced to western Europe prior to 2004 through the pet trade (Lötters et al., 2020), and it is associated with rapid population declines of fire salamanders (Salamandra salamandra) in the Netherlands and Germany (Lötters et al., 2020; Martel et al., 2013; Spitzen‐van der Sluijs et al., 2013). Populations that survived this devastating outbreak showed no subsequent resistance to Bsal (Stegen et al., 2017), suggesting that evolutionary rescue and effective prophylactic treatments (i.e., development of vaccines) are both unlikely. Further spread of Bsal is cause for concern because thousands of urodele species endemic to other regions are highly susceptible to this pathogen and would likely experience population declines if it were introduced into their ranges (Martel et al., 2014; Stegen et al., 2017). Some anuran species can also act as reservoir hosts for Bsal, potentially increasing the rate of spread following new introductions (Lötters et al., 2020; Nguyen et al., 2017). Understanding and limiting pathogen dispersal are major objectives in the management of emerging wildlife pathogens (Biek & Real, 2010; Wilder et al., 2015). Based on the current evidence, preventing new introductions and slowing range expansion following introductions should be considered the only feasible control measures for Bsal (Stegen et al., 2017). Species distribution models (SDMs) are a common tool used to relate environmental conditions to occurrence data for a species to predict its distribution (Elith & Leathwick, 2009). In the context of pathogen management, SDMs can identify areas to prioritize for surveillance or to limit range expansion (Raffini et al., 2020). SDMs were used to predict the distribution of the “fundamental niche” of Bd in the New World and Australia (Rödder et al., 2008; Ron, 2005) and the fundamental niche of Bsal in Europe (Feldmeier et al., 2016; Lötters et al., 2020). SDMs have been used to forecast the distribution of Bd at a global scale, to quantify associated Bd‐related extinction risks for amphibians under a range of climate scenarios, and to predict suitable habitat for Bsal in Mexico should an introduction occur (Basanta et al., 2019; Lötters et al., 2010; Olson et al., 2021; Rödder et al., 2009, 2010). Building an SDM for an invasive species is challenging in the early stages of the invasion when data are limited (Bertolino et al., 2020; Katz & Zellmer, 2018), or when predicting suitable habitat based on occurrence data from regions with different environmental conditions. Field sampling and SDMs have been used to characterize the niche used by Bd in tropical regions (Bacigalupe et al., 2019; Catenazzi et al., 2011; Fisher et al., 2009; Kriger & Hero, 2007; Saenz et al., 2015). Models of habitat suitability for Bd in Nearctic areas have relied heavily on these data from warmer climates and have predicted low habitat suitability for Bd in northern Nearctic regions (Rödder et al., 2010; Xie et al., 2016). However, sampling in Canada detected Bd at high latitudes: 60°18′N (Schock et al., 2010); 54°73′N (D’Aoust‐Messier et al., 2015); 46°81′ N (Ouellet et al., 2005). These detections could indicate a recent range expansion—but Bd was also detected in museum specimens from Quebec, Canada, collected as early as 1961 (Ouellet et al., 2005). Further sampling across Canada continues to detect Bd even with low sampling effort, and reported prevalence in samples from wild populations of Canadian amphibians ranges from 26.9% to 100% (Brunet et al., 2020; D’Aoust‐Messier et al., 2015; Forzán et al., 2010; Jongsma et al., 2019; McMillan et al., 2020; Schock et al., 2010). Taken together, these studies contradict the predictions of available SDMs and suggest Bd is established and enzootic in Canada, highlighting the importance of representative sampling to inform SDMs. Although Bsal has not yet been detected in North America, suitable climatic conditions and brisk international trade in amphibians place the continent at high risk of a Bsal invasion (Govindarajulu et al., 2017; Waddle et al., 2020; Yap et al., 2017). Identifying potential high‐risk areas now can enable faster responses to slow pathogen spread in the case of an introduction. Basanta et al. (2019) identified high‐risk areas for Bsal introduction to Mexico based on environmental conditions and species richness of susceptible salamanders, and a similar approach in Canada could inform surveillance efforts and disease mitigation if necessary. Northern populations of urodeles may be particularly vulnerable to Bsal because its growth and virulence appear to be correlated with temperature. A SDM of Bsal in Europe found the fungus can thrive in cool regions and suggested that amphibians in cooler climates may be at higher risk because their immune defenses are largely temperature‐dependent (Feldmeier et al., 2016). This hypothesis was supported by experimental infection of the Nearctic eastern newt (Notophthalmus viridescens) with Bsal, which led to higher mortality at lower temperatures (Carter et al., 2021). These results shifted concern about Bsal northwards from previous risk assessments, identifying the northeastern United States and southeastern Canada as high‐risk areas. In this study, we aimed to reduce the uncertainty around the drivers and distribution of chytridiomycosis in northern climates. We used SDMs based on local occurrence data to estimate the likely distribution of Bd in our study area (Ontario, Canada, and an island of Nunavut just off the coast of Ontario), and we used available data on suitable habitat for Bsal to identify particularly high‐risk areas in the region that could be prioritized for surveillance in the case of an introduction. We conducted surveillance for Bd and Bsal in the study area across a latitudinal gradient of 15 decimal degrees that exceeds the northern range limits predicted by recent SDMs (Rödder et al., 2010; Xie et al., 2016), but within which Bd has been shown to occur (D’Aoust‐Messier et al., 2015; McMillan et al., 2020). Our results are intended to inform surveillance activities and mitigation strategies to control these pathogens and their effects on amphibian diversity in temperate climates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Surveillance for Bd and Bsal

To obtain samples across a wide geographic area, we provided sampling kits to a broad network of government biologists and interested researchers, who opportunistically swabbed any amphibians they encountered during their work across the province of Ontario and on Akimiski Island, Nunavut (Canada). Sampling methods were approved by the Wildlife Animal Care Committee of the Government of Ontario and by Ontario Parks. Briefly, participants identified each amphibian they captured to species. They recorded potential clinical signs of chytridiomycosis, but collected swab samples from each individual regardless of clinical signs. Participants wore new nitrile gloves to handle each individual to avoid cross‐contamination of samples. Samples were collected by rubbing sterile swabs (Puritan, 6” Sterile Polyester Tipped Applicator 25‐806 1PD) on the ventral surface, under the forelimbs, and along the sides of the mouth. Tadpole swabbing focused on the mouth area where the fungus is able to grow on the keratinized mouthparts. Swabs were rotated while sampling to ensure all sides of the swab made contact. Samples were stored in lysis buffer, kept cool and out of direct sunlight while in the field, and then stored in fridges and/or freezers (as available) prior to laboratory analysis at the Animal Health Laboratory (AHL) in Guelph, Ontario. We used qPCR analysis of the samples to estimate distribution and prevalence of Bd and to conduct surveillance for Bsal. The AHL facility follows strict quality control procedures, including use of a separate DNA extraction room, master mix assembly room, and amplification room. Positive control and negative control samples were included in all procedures from DNA extraction to amplification. We extracted DNA from the swab samples using a commercial DNA extraction kit (DNeasy Plant Mini Kit, Qiagen, Toronto, Ontario) and following the manufacturer's protocols. Real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays were performed to detect Bd and Bsal, as described previously (Blooi et al., 2013, 2016), and the qPCR assays conducted at the AHL are ISO/IEC 17025 accredited and periodically validated to ensure accuracy. To avoid cross‐talk between the Cy5 and Fam fluorescent markers, we performed the duplex qPCR as two simplex qPCRs. Samples were run singly, but we confirmed inconclusive (borderline positive) samples by retesting in triplicate. We scored samples with cycle threshold (CT) values (CT) >40 as negative for the target (Bd or Bsal). This conservative approach reduces the risk of false positives, but may underestimate the true prevalence of the target pathogens. Thus, our data represent an estimate of minimum prevalence. We tested for spatial autocorrelation among sampling locations using the join count test from the R package spdep (Bivand & Wong, 2018).

Exploring the distribution of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis

Latitudinal distribution of Bsal detection

To explore the hypothesis of a northern range limit for Bd, we tested the association between Bd prevalence and sampling latitude using logistic regression in R 4.0.3 (R Core Team, 2020). We restricted this analysis to those species with a sample size >100 that were well‐sampled across a broad latitudinal range (Lithobates sylvaticus, L. clamitans, L. pipiens, and Anaxyrus americanus).

Species distribution models—Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis

We created six SDMs in Maxent version 3.4.1 (Phillips et al., 2006) to identify suitable habitat for Bd across our study area using our detected cases and 20 environmental variables. Maxent is an open‐source program that uses presence points and a maximum entropy algorithm to estimate the probability of species occurrence when constrained by environmental conditions. Maxent has high discriminatory power (Bradie & Leung, 2017) and has been used previously to create SDMs for Bd and Bsal (Bacigalupe et al., 2019; Basanta et al., 2019; Lötters et al., 2010; Rahman, 2020; Rödder et al., 2008; Ron, 2005; Seimon et al., 2015). These studies used 19 bioclimatic variables from WorldClim 2.1 (https://worldclim.org/data/index.html) (Fick & Hijmans, 2017) (Table 1) and found that many are predictors of Bd habitat suitability and chytridiomycosis severity. We also used these variables, but instead of using the 50‐year averages from WorldClim, we recreated these variables for the period of our study (2014–2017) using data from the Daily Surface Weather Data version 3 (Daymet). This NASA‐sourced raster dataset includes monthly summaries of daily weather parameters across North America at a 1 km resolution (Thornton et al., 2017). We downloaded 4 years of temperature and precipitation data and used the R package dismo to recreate the 19 bioclimatic variables for each year (Hijmans et al., 2021). After averaging each variable across years, they were checked for errors using reference code available through the USGS (O’Donnel & Ignizio, 2012). To explore the effect of elevation on the distribution of Bd, we also included a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (NASA JPL, 2013). We resampled this DEM to a 1 km grid to match the bioclimatic variables. We initially considered also including an urbanization variable, distance to roads, to account for potential human impacts on Bd occurrence. However, almost all of our samples were collected in close proximity to roads due to our opportunistic sampling design. Thus, this variable could have simply confounded the models (i.e., resulted in predictions that sites far from roads were not suitable habitat simply because our sampling was biased toward sites near roads), and we did not include this variable in our analyses.
TABLE 1

Environmental variables used in the Maxent models (NASA JPL, 2013)

Variable Bd Models Bsal Models
Full Reduced Full Reduced
Bioclimatic variables
BIO1—Annual Mean Temperaturexx
BIO2—Mean Diurnal Rangexxx
BIO3—Isothermality (= BIO2/BIO7)xxxx
BIO4—Temperature Seasonalityxx
BIO5—Max Temperature of Warmest Monthxxxx
BIO6—Min Temperature of Coldest Monthxxx
BIO7—Temperature Annual Rangexxx
BIO8—Mean Temperature of Wettest Quarterxxx
BIO9—Mean Temperature of Driest Quarterxx
BIO10—Mean Temperature of Warmest Quarterxx
BIO11—Mean Temperature of Coldest Quarterxx
BIO12—Annual Precipitationxx
BIO13—Precipitation of Wettest Monthxx
BIO14—Precipitation of Driest Monthxx
BIO15—Precipitation Seasonalityxxxx
BIO16—Precipitation of Wettest Quarterxxxx
BIO17—Precipitation of Driest Quarterxxx
BIO18—Precipitation of Warmest Quarterxxx
BIO19—Precipitation of Coldest Quarterxx
Digital Elevation Modelxx

Bioclimatic variables for the Bd and Bsal models were sourced from Daymet (Thornton et al., 2017) and WorldClim 2.1 (Fick & Hijmans, 2017), respectively.

Environmental variables used in the Maxent models (NASA JPL, 2013) Bioclimatic variables for the Bd and Bsal models were sourced from Daymet (Thornton et al., 2017) and WorldClim 2.1 (Fick & Hijmans, 2017), respectively. Our six models were constructed using a combination of variable sets (Full set vs Reduced set based on a correlation analysis), and three different bias grids (a raster surface that represents sampling effort, cropped to a buffer of 0.5, 1, and 2 decimal degrees) that would restrict background point selection to address sampling bias. A Maxent model's goodness of fit is estimated by gain (Phillips et al., 2017), which can be increased by addressing collinearity and reducing the environmental layer inputs in the model (Kramer‐Schadt et al., 2013). We created a correlation matrix of variables listed in Table 1 to identify highly correlated variables (Table A1; R > .75). We ran logistic regression among these and retained the variable that showed the strongest association with Bd presence based on point‐wise values from all 1,041 sample locations. In cases where the difference was small and the choice was between variable representing averages and weather extremes, we retained the extremes as these are most relevant to niche limits (Lötters et al., 2010; Seimon et al., 2015). This process identified the nine variables used in the “Reduced” models (columns 1 and 2, Table 1).
TABLE A1

Correlation Matrix of 19 bioclimatic variables and Digital Elevation Model (DEM) used to reduce the number of variables in the Bd models

BIO1BIO2BIO3BIO4BIO5BIO6BIO7BIO8BIO9BIO10BIO11BIO12BIO13BIO14BIO15BIO16BIO17BIO18BIO19DEM
BIO11
BIO2−0.131
BIO30.720.49
BIO4 −0.92 0.13 −0.79 1
BIO5 0.86 0.10.59−0.611
BIO6 0.97 −0.270.68 −0.95 0.75 1
BIO7 −0.88 0.37−0.62 0.96 −0.54 −0.96 1
BIO80.14−0.15−0.190.120.360.060.071
BIO9 0.9 −0.210.69 −0.92 0.66 0.94 −0.92 −0.071
BIO10 0.94 −0.180.53−0.73 0.95 0.87 −0.720.35 0.78 1
BIO11 0.99 −0.14 0.75 −0.96 0.79 0.99 −0.93 0.05 0.93 0.89 1
BIO120.680.26 0.84 −0.81 0.430.67−0.67−0.330.70.450.731
BIO130.450.130.54−0.550.260.46−0.47−0.180.450.270.480.731
BIO140.740.12 0.77 −0.84 0.50.73−0.72−0.28 0.76 0.55 0.79 0.9 0.541
BIO15−0.62−0.3 −0.76 0.7−0.46−0.580.550.25−0.62−0.46−0.66 −0.77 −0.2 −0.84 1
BIO160.580.210.69−0.680.380.57−0.56−0.240.580.390.62 0.9 0.9 0.73−0.461
BIO17 0.76 0.16 0.83 −0.87 0.5 0.75 −0.75 −0.32 0.8 0.54 0.81 0.94 0.55 0.97 −0.87 0.76 1
BIO180.480.30.58−0.490.410.41−0.360.080.390.380.480.740.710.6−0.4 0.82 0.61
BIO190.610.18 0.79 −0.79 0.30.64−0.69−0.480.730.350.68 0.93 0.58 0.86 −0.8 0.75 0.93 0.541
DEM0.380.060.22−0.320.40.28−0.190.080.270.380.360.420.350.53−0.30.480.420.540.211

Data are derived from the Daily Surface Weather Data Version 3 (Daymet) and the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (Farr et al., 2007; NASA JPL, 2013). Variables with a correlation R > 0.75 are presented in bold.

Maxent is robust when handling multicollinearity among predictor variables, but there is uncertainty on whether to include all potential variables into an SDM or to reduce the number of variables a priori (Feng et al., 2019). In ambiguous situations where the drivers of species and climate relationships are unknown, retaining one variable from a highly correlated cluster may cause the future range predictions to vary considerably (Braunisch et al., 2013). Therefore, we also ran full models containing all 20 variables for each of the three bias grids. Our goal was not to identify a single, best‐fit model, but to evaluate the qualitative agreement among biologically informative model outputs (i.e., how robust were our results to different model parameters). We converted all 20 Daymet variables listed in Table 1 to the same coordinate system (WGS 1984) before clipping them to a 5 km‐buffered boundary of the sampling area, which included the province of Ontario and Akimiski Island (Nunavut) for processing in Maxent version 3.4.1 (Phillips et al., 2006). Maxent analyses rely on the assumption that detection probability is constant across all sites (Phillips et al., 2009), although this is frequently violated in practice (Yackulic et al., 2013). Uneven sampling effort can be addressed by thinning the number of occurrences (spatial filtering), by manipulating the background data to account oversampled areas (i.e., using a bias grid), and by reducing multicollinearity (Kramer‐Schadt et al., 2013). Most of the samples were collected in southern Ontario, while the remote north‐west region of the province was sparsely sampled. We applied a spatial filter to the data by retaining only one positive case point per km2 (Kramer‐Schadt et al., 2013) and used bias grids to correct for the possible effects of the sampling distribution on the model output (Fourcade et al., 2014). These grids were created using the Gaussian Kernel density of sampling localities tool in the SDM Toolbox v2.4 in ArcGIS 10.3 (Brown et al., 2017). As there is no defined rule for selecting background sampling localities, we used three different sampling bias thresholds (0.5, 1, and 2 decimal degrees). These were clipped to the same extent as the other rasters and inputted into Maxent as a bias layer. For all six models, the optimal model settings were first selected using the R package ENMeval prior to running in Maxent. This package's function ENMevaluate helps fine‐tune ecological niche models by running multiple iterations of user defined specifications for the regularization multiplier (RM) and Maxent feature types (e.g., linear) (Muscarella et al., 2014). The RM is a smoothing parameter that adds constraints to the model to prevent overfitting (Phillips & Dudík, 2008). We used RM increments of 0.5, between 0.5 and 2, with four combinations of linear, quadratic, product, and hinge features (“L,” “LQ,” “LQP,” and “LQH”) to create 20 candidate models using the random‐fold method and 10 k‐folds. We selected the models with the lowest delta Akaike's information criterion for small sample sizes (ΔAICc), a measure of goodness of fit that penalizes overparameterization (Muscarella et al., 2014). The best‐supported model determined the RM and feature settings in Maxent. We used the default ClogLog output format in Maxent, which provides an estimate of probability of presence between zero and one for each pixel. It is considered the most appropriate for estimating probability of presence, although it often estimates higher suitability values than the logistic output (Phillips et al., 2017). We partitioned Bd occurrence data into two groups (75% training, 25% testing) and tested the Maxent models with cross‐validation using the default of a maximum of 10,000 randomly sampled background points. We set the maximum number of iterations to 5,000 and ran 10 replicates of each model, using the averaged suitability probabilities for our analyses. To evaluate the individual model performance, we used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC). A model with an AUC = 0.5 has no discrimination ability, while models with an AUC > 0.7 have adequate power of discrimination (Hosmer et al., 2013). We further evaluated the predictive accuracy of our models by calculating the true skill statistic (TSS) (Sensitivity + Specificity − 1; please see Allouche et al., 2006 for details). Values range between 0 and 1, with higher values indicating better goodness of fit. We took the average TSS for the 10 replicate runs. We evaluated the relative importance of each predictor variable using Maxent's Jackknife tests, which show the changes in gain when each variable is either removed from model or is the only variable retained. The 10th percentile minimum training presence ClogLog threshold was used to create binary maps of habitat suitability for the study area. This threshold omits records with habitat suitability <10 percent during model training based on the assumption that the outlying locations do not represent typical habitat. This threshold performed the best in a previous SDM used to identify areas of endemism in North American mammals (Escalante et al., 2013) and is less sensitive to extreme localities (Radosavljevic & Anderson, 2014). AUC does not quantify overfitting and may result in overly complex models. Therefore, comparisons of omission rates from Maxent's output were used to assess overfitting in each model, which affects the model's generality, by comparing the observed values to the expected result.

Predicting the distribution of Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans

We used two approaches to identify likely high‐risk areas for the introduction of Bsal in our study area. First, we replicated the approach used by Basanta et al. (2019) in Mexico to predict likely suitable habitat for Bsal within our study area, based on the environmental conditions in areas where Bsal is native or has become established. Second, we mapped the ranges of the species in our study area that are likely to be susceptible to Bsal, identified areas of high species richness based on those ranges, and overlaid climate variables associated with severe Bsal chytridiomycosis (Carter et al., 2021) to identify high‐priority areas for surveillance in case of an introduction.

Species distribution models—Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans

Basanta et al. (2019) used Bsal presence data from Asia and Europe to predict where Bsal might thrive in Mexico if introduced and then compared the output to species richness in the region to identify hotspots of conservation concern. We replicated this approach for our study area using 44 Bsal occurrence records summarized in Basanta et al. (2019) and 171 additional records from Lötters et al. (2020), sourced from Beukema et al. (2018), Dalbeck et al. (2018), Laking et al. (2017), Lötters et al. (2018), Martel et al. (2014), Schulz et al. (2018), Spitzen‐van der Sluijs et al. (2016), Wagner et al. (2019), and Yuan et al. (2018). Daymet is unavailable outside North America, so we used the 19 bioclimatic variables from WorldClim 2.1 to obtain comparable environmental data for the current Bsal range and our study area (Fick & Hijmans, 2017). We selected terrestrial ecoregion boundaries from https://databasin.org that overlapped with Bsal cases to clip the raster layers in Asia and Europe (Olson et al., 2001). We selected bioclimatic variables previously associated with Bsal prevalence (Table 2), and these eleven bioclimatic rasters were tested for multicollinearity (R > .75) as described above for the Bd models. The only difference was the use of 100 randomly sampled pseudoabsences to compare to the Bsal positives in the logistic regression tests.
TABLE 2

Variables found to have strong association with Bsal prevalence in previous literature

SourceVariable related to BSAL prevalence
Basanta et al. (2019)

Minimum temperature of the coldest month (BIO5)

Temperature annual range (BIO7)

Precipitation seasonality

Martel et al. (2013)

Salamander richness

Trade risks (e.g., active ports for importing salamanders)

Urodele family

More et al. (2018)

Spread by passive carriers (e.g., water, birds)

Human activities, waste water, equipment, fomites

Connected waterways

Beukema et al. (2018)

Isothermality (BIO3)

Temperature seasonality (BIO4)

Maximum temperature of the warmest month (BIO5)

Minimum temperature of the coldest month (BIO6)

Precipitation seasonality (BIO15)

Precipitation of the wettest quarter (BIO16)

Precipitation of the driest quarter (BIO17)

Feldmeier et al. (2016)

Days with minimum temperatures between 10° and 15°C

Highest number of consecutive days warmer than 25°C

Mean temperature of the coldest quarter (BIO11)

Precipitation of the driest quarter (BIO17)

Katz and Zellmer (2018)

Salamander richness

Number of salamander imports

Isothermality (BIO3)

Temperature seasonality (BIO4)

Mean temperature of the warmest quarter (BIO10)

Precipitation of the wettest month (BIO13)

Precipitation of the driest month (BIO14)

Yap et al. (2017)

Temperatures 5–25°C, with optimal growth at 10–15°C

Bsal was detected on salamanders in ponds where water temperatures were over 26°C

The six bioclimatic variables in bold were selected through correlation analysis and used to predict habitat suitability for Bsal in the present study.

Variables found to have strong association with Bsal prevalence in previous literature Minimum temperature of the coldest month (BIO5) Temperature annual range (BIO7) Precipitation seasonality Salamander richness Trade risks (e.g., active ports for importing salamanders) Urodele family Spread by passive carriers (e.g., water, birds) Human activities, waste water, equipment, fomites Connected waterways Isothermality (BIO3) Temperature seasonality (BIO4) Maximum temperature of the warmest month (BIO5) Minimum temperature of the coldest month (BIO6) Precipitation seasonality (BIO15) Precipitation of the wettest quarter (BIO16) Precipitation of the driest quarter (BIO17) Days with minimum temperatures between 10° and 15°C Highest number of consecutive days warmer than 25°C Mean temperature of the coldest quarter (BIO11) Precipitation of the driest quarter (BIO17) Salamander richness Number of salamander imports Isothermality (BIO3) Temperature seasonality (BIO4) Mean temperature of the warmest quarter (BIO10) Precipitation of the wettest month (BIO13) Precipitation of the driest month (BIO14) Temperatures 5–25°C, with optimal growth at 10–15°C Bsal was detected on salamanders in ponds where water temperatures were over 26°C The six bioclimatic variables in bold were selected through correlation analysis and used to predict habitat suitability for Bsal in the present study. To predict habitat suitability for Bsal in our study area, we constructed six SDMs based on the Asian and European occurrence data, spatially filtered so that each square kilometer only contained one occurrence. Two SDMs used all 215 cases, one with the full set of predictor variables and one using the reduced set. We also ran full and reduced models using only the occurrence data from Asia (N = 30) and only that from Europe (N = 185). We did not include elevation in these models because of the large difference in elevation between Ontario and the native range of Bsal (>3,400 m). The R function ENMevaluate was used again to optimize the settings for each model, with RM values set to increments of 0.5 between 0.5 and 2.5, with four possible feature classes (L, LQ, LQP, LQH). We used the random‐fold method for the two models with the complete dataset, and the jackknife method for the Asia‐only and Europe‐only models because of their smaller sample size (Muscarella et al., 2014). These outputs provided the optimized settings for the Bsal models in Maxent, which were set to 5000 iterations. A 100 km bias grid buffer around the occurrences was used to restrict the selection of 10,000 background points. Finally, we reclassified the ClogLog output of the projected suitability maps for Bsal in Ontario from high (>0.75) to no suitability (<25).

Predicting high‐risk areas for Bsal infection

We aggregated distribution data for Bsal‐susceptible salamander species to quantify the distribution of species at high risk from Bsal in our study area. These included Salamandrid, Proteid, and Plethodontid species that are thought to be vulnerable to Bsal infections (Carter et al., 2021; Martel et al., 2014; O’Hanlon et al., 2018). Genomic analysis and laboratory tests suggest that Ambystomatid salamanders are resistant to Bsal infection (Barnhart et al., 2020; Martel et al., 2014; Pereira & Woodley, 2021) (Table A2), although they may still be able to carry and spread Bsal. Our objective was to identify priority areas for future surveillance for Bsal in the ranges of vulnerable species, so Ambystoma was excluded from this prioritization analysis.
TABLE A2

Species in dataset obtained from our occurrence records and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF, 2020)

SpeciesCommon name N (%)
Plethodontidae
Plethodon cinereus Eastern red‐backed salamander2,843 (63.1)
Eurycea bislineata Two‐lined salamander193 (4.3)
Hemidactylium scutatum Four‐toed salamander117 (2.6)
Proteidae
Necturus maculosus Common mudpuppy234 (5.2)
Salamandridae
Notophthalmus viridescens Eastern newt1,120 (24.9)
TOTAL4507

These species are confirmed or considered potentially susceptible to Bsal (Martel et al., 2014).

We included occurrence records for vulnerable species from our study results (N = 97) and from occurrence data archived in the Global Biodiversity Information Facility since 1950 (GBIF, 2020; N = 4410). The final dataset included Notophthalmus viridescens (N = 1120), Necturus maculosus (N = 234), Plethodon cinereus (N = 2843), Eurycea bislineata (N = 193), and Hemidactylium scutatum (N = 117). Desmognathus fuscus and D. ochrophaeus occur in Ontario, but were excluded due to insufficient data. We used these occurrence data to redraw range maps for each species, modifying the range maps produced by International Union for Conservation of Nature (Hammerson, 2004; IUCN SSC ASG, 2015a, 2015b, 2015c, 2015d). The final range maps for each species were then overlayed using the Union tool in R to create a map of species richness. Carter et al. (2021) used trials of Bsal infection severity at different temperatures to map the risk of Bsal invasion to N. viridescens, the eastern newt. In these laboratory tests, adult and juvenile N. viridescens died sooner from Bsal infection at 14°C than at 6 or 22°C, with 90 percent mortality at 6°C and 14°C, though animals died 1.4 times slower at 6°C. Carter et al. (2021) used these thresholds to reclassify temperature variables and predict Bsal mortality risk across the range of N. viridescens. In the absence of available data for other species, we made an explicit assumption that these thresholds can be applied to other susceptible species. We replicated the approach of Carter et al. (2021) in our study area using average annual temperature and maximum temperature of the warmest month variables (BIO1 and BIO5 from Daymet, Table 1). For each variable, temperatures between 6 to 14°C were assigned the highest risk to Bsal (risk score = 4), while temperatures 22°C or greater classified as lowest risk (risk score = 1). All temperatures below 6°C were scaled from 1 to 4, and temperatures between 14°C and 22°C scaled from 4 and 1 (Carter et al., 2021). After averaging the two layers, we overlapped the result with the salamander species richness map to identify areas of high Bsal risk to native salamanders.

RESULTS

We collected 1,041 skin‐swab samples from 18 species of frogs and salamanders across 735,345 km2 and a latitudinal gradient of 15.07 decimal degrees (41°73′N–56°80′N), and tested these for Bd and Bsal using qPCR (Figures 1 and 2; Table 3). We detected Bd in 113/1041 samples (10.9%) that were distributed across our study area, with the exception of the far north of Ontario where our sampling was limited. Ten samples from 2015 produced inconclusive results for Bd (clear amplification curve but CT > 40), and we scored these as negative. We did not detect Bsal in any of the samples.
FIGURE 1

Surveillance for Bd and Bsal from 2014–2017. 1041 animals were tested across 18 species in Ontario and Akimiski Island in James Bay. 113 tested positive for Bd (10.9%). None tested positive for Bsal

FIGURE 2

Distribution of Bd results with qPCR by latitude and species. The black squares represent average latitude for each species

TABLE 3

Detection of Bd by qPCR from epithelial swab samples (total swabs (Bd+swabs)) collected across the study area shown for each family (in bold) and species (in italics)

SpeciesSamples (Total (Bd+)Prevalence of Bd Combined sampleCombined prevalence
20142015201620172014201520162017
Frogs and toads (ANURA)
True frogs (Ranidae) 131 (27) 348 (37) 109 (11) 29 (8) 0.21 0.11 0.10 0.28 617 (83) 0.13
Lithobates sylvaticus 87 (16)107 (17)46 (4)23 (7)0.180.160.090.30263 (44)0.17
Lithobates clamitans 35 (8)128 (10)7 (0)0.230.080.00170 (18)0.11
Lithobates pipiens 2 (0)107 (9)10 (2)1 (1)0.000.080.201.00120 (12)0.10
Lithobates septentrionalis 5 (3)5 (1)29 (4)5 (0)0.600.200.140.0044 (8)0.18
Lithobates catesbeianus 2 (0)1 (0)16 (1)0.000.000.0619 (1)0.05
Lithobates palustris 1 (0)0.001 (0)0.00
Tree Frogs (Hylidae) 2 (0) 21 (1) 13 (1) 8 (0) 0.00 0.05 0.08 0.00 44 (2) 0.05
Pseudacris crucifer 17 (1)6 (0)6 (0)0.060.000.0029 (1)0.03
Pseudacris maculata 1 (0)4 (0)5 (1)0.000.000.2010 (1)0.10
Hyla versicolor 1 (0)2 (0)2 (0)0.000.000.005 (0)0.00
Toads (Bufonidae) 30 (7) 68 (5) 84 (7) 16 (3) 0.23 0.07 0.08 0.19 198 (22) 0.11
Anaxyrus americanus 30 (7)65 (5)68 (7)16 (3)0.230.080.100.19179 (22)0.12
Anaxyrus fowleri 3 (0)16 (0)0.000.0019 (0)0.00
Salamanders (CAUDATA)
Mole Salamanders (Ambystomatidae) 62 (1) 20 (0) 3 (0) 0.02 0.00 0.00 85 (1) 0.01
Ambystoma laterale a 31 (1)17 (0)3 (0)0.030.000.0051 (1)0.02
Ambystoma maculatum 23 (0)1 (0)0.000.0024 (0)0.00
Ambystoma jeffersonianum 8 (0)2 (0)0.000.0010 (0)0.00
Lungless Salamanders (Plethodontidae) 51 (2) 34 (0) 0.04 0.00 85 (2) 0.02
Plethodon cinereus 50 (2)33 (0)0.040.0083 (2)0.02
Eurycea bislineata 1 (0)0.001 (0)0.00
Hemidactylium scutatum 1 (0)0.001 (0)0.00
Newts (Salamandridae) 6 (2) 6 (1) 0.33 0.17 12 (3) 0.25
Notophthalmus viridescens 6 (2)6 (1)0.330.1712 (3)0.25
TOTALS163 (34)556 (48)266 (20)56 (11)0.210.090.080.201,041 (113)0.11

Each swab was also tested for Bsal, but that pathogen was not detected in any sample.

Five of these individuals were identified as possible laterale‐jeffersonianum hybrids.

Surveillance for Bd and Bsal from 2014–2017. 1041 animals were tested across 18 species in Ontario and Akimiski Island in James Bay. 113 tested positive for Bd (10.9%). None tested positive for Bsal Distribution of Bd results with qPCR by latitude and species. The black squares represent average latitude for each species Detection of Bd by qPCR from epithelial swab samples (total swabs (Bd+swabs)) collected across the study area shown for each family (in bold) and species (in italics) Each swab was also tested for Bsal, but that pathogen was not detected in any sample. Five of these individuals were identified as possible laterale‐jeffersonianum hybrids. Prevalence of Bd varied among species and years, but we detected Bd in 11/18 sampled species (eight species of frogs, three species of salamander), and in all species with sample sizes >25. Yearly prevalence in our samples (number of positives/total number of samples per year) from 2014 to 2017 was 20.6%, 8.6%, 7.5%, and 19.6%, respectively, but sampling locations varied geographically each year. Swabbed individuals appeared healthy and did not exhibit obvious clinical signs of disease, with two exceptions: (1) one adult L. sylvaticus had reddish skin on its legs, but tested negative for Batrachochytrium and (2) a mature, deceased L. pipiens collected near Peterborough, Ontario, tested positive for Bd (Figure A1).
FIGURE A1

Deceased Lithobates pipiens that tested positive for Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis near Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

The detected prevalence of Bd increased as the number of sampled animals increased. This trend was borderline significant using linear regression (p = .057), though the sample size was small (i.e., 18 species). Sampling locations were spatially autocorrelated (p < .0001), and most were near roads due to the opportunistic nature of the sampling.

Latitudinal distribution

There was no linear association between Bd detection and latitude for well‐sampled species (>100 occurrences/species; N = 732; p = .19), nor any apparent association for the other species (Figure 2). We retained 86 of the 113 Bd occurrences after spatial filtering (Figure 3a). Results from the six Bd SDMs are summarized in Table 4, and all performed best with a combination of linear, quadratic, and hinge features (LQH) with a RM of 1.5 or 2 (Figure A2). All model AUC values were above 0.73 (±0.03) for training and 0.68 (±0.03) for test data, with an average of 0.82 and 0.74, respectively, indicating moderate performance as classifiers. The Full model with the 0.5 Bias Grid (Full 0.5 model) had the highest AUC test score (0.79) followed by the Reduced 0.5 model (0.78).
FIGURE 3

(a) Predicted habitat suitability of Bd using the 10th percentile training presence ClogLog threshold from the study area. Solid shading indicates suitable habitat, which are overlayed with the 86 positive spatially filtered occurrence points used to create this Maxent model. (b) Predicted habitat suitability for the best model (Reduced, Bias Grid 0.5). This model was created using nine predictor variables (Table 1)

TABLE 4

Summary statistics for the six Maxent suitability models of Bd

Model TypeFeatureRMTraining AUC (Average)Test AUCAUC Standard Deviation10 percentile training presence ClogLog threshold% of study area classified as suitable habitat using ClogLog threshold% of study area classified as highly suitable habitat (>0.6)Omission Rate (10th percentile training presence test omission)Average true skill statistic (TSS)
Reduced model
Bias 0.5LQH1.50.850.780.070.5044.630.20.180.47
Bias 1LQH1.50.830.740.080.5053.533.00.180.38
Bias 2LQ0.50.730.680.090.3776.237.20.110.16
Full model
Bias 0.5LQH20.850.790.070.4947.633.50.110.45
Bias 1LQH1.50.840.750.070.5045.928.70.200.45
Bias 2LQH1.50.820.730.080.4648.428.40.270.41
Average 0.82 0.74 0.07 0.47 52.7 31.8 0.18 0.39
FIGURE A2

Results of ENMevaluate in R for selecting Regularization Multiplier (RM) for the (a) Reduced Bd Models and (b) Full Bd models will 20 variables. Lower ∆AICc values indicated a better model

(a) Predicted habitat suitability of Bd using the 10th percentile training presence ClogLog threshold from the study area. Solid shading indicates suitable habitat, which are overlayed with the 86 positive spatially filtered occurrence points used to create this Maxent model. (b) Predicted habitat suitability for the best model (Reduced, Bias Grid 0.5). This model was created using nine predictor variables (Table 1) Summary statistics for the six Maxent suitability models of Bd Across the six models, an average of 483,032 km2 (52.7%) of the study area was classified as suitable habitat for Bd using the 10th percentile minimum training presence ClogLog threshold. The proportion of suitable area ranged from 44.6% to 76.2% and increased with each background extent. Assuming that a threshold >0.6 indicates high suitability (Stabach et al., 2009), 28.4% to 37.2% of the study area was classified as highly suitable in the six models (Table 4). All models had omission rates below 27% (mean omission rate: 18%), and the models with the best omission rates (closest to 10%, the theoretical expectation) were the Reduced 2.0 model and Full 0.5 model, which each had omission rates of 0.11 indicating lower overfitting. The Reduced 0.5 model was selected as the best model due a high AUC score, the highest TSS score (0.47) and the most conservative prediction of Bd habitat suitability (44.6%), although the omission rate was moderate (0.18). Figure 3a,b present the mapping output for the Reduced 0.5 model and the area classified as suitable using the 10th percentile threshold, respectively. Maps based on the other five models are available in the Appendix A (Figure A3, Figure A4). Results were similar, indicating that these models were qualitatively robust to variations in model inputs and settings.
FIGURE A3

(a) Reduced Model outputs of predicted habitat suitability of Bd using the ClogLog distribution using three different background extents for the bias grid (0.5, 1, and 2 decimal degrees). (b) The 10th percentile training presence ClogLog threshold for each background bias grid. Shading indicates the area of habitat suitability. The reduced models were created with nine predictor variables listed in Table 1

FIGURE A4

(a) Full Model outputs of predicted habitat suitability of Bd using the ClogLog distribution using three different background extents for the bias grid (0.5, 1, and 2 decimal degrees). (b) The 10th percentile training presence ClogLog threshold for each background bias grid. Shading indicates the area of habitat suitability. The full models were created with 21 variables listed in Table 1

Three variables contributed to 68.5% of the variability and drove performance of the Reduced 0.5 model (Table A3). Minimum Temperature of the Coldest Month (BIO6) made the greatest contribution (41.2%) to the predicted probability of Bd presence. Habitat suitability was positively correlated with BIO6 in places with minimum temperatures below −25°C, above which the response curve flattens out (Figure A5). Mean Diurnal Range (BIO2) was the second greatest contributor (16.7%). As the range in diurnal temperature widened, the probability of Bd presence increased. The model‐predicted probability of Bd distribution also increased with Isothermality (BIO3; 10.6%), a ratio comparing day to night temperature oscillations to summer/winter oscillations, represented as a percent (O’Donnel & Ignizio, 2012).
TABLE A3

Percent contribution and permutation importance of each environmental predictor of the model with the best performance (Best model: Bias Grid 0.5, Reduced variables)

VariablePercent contributionPermutation importance
Min Temperature of Coldest Month (BIO6)41.212.7
Mean Diurnal Range (BIO2)16.77.2
Isothermality (BIO3)10.62.9
Precipitation of Warmest Quarter (BIO18)6.814.8
Max Temperature of Warmest Month (BIO5)6.69.3
Precipitation of Wettest Quarter (BIO16)6.433.7
Elevation (m)4.43.1
Mean Temperature of Wettest Quarter (BIO8)4.310.4
Precipitation Seasonality (BIO15)2.95.8
FIGURE A5

Response curves created in Maxent of the most important variables in the best Maxent model (Reduced 0.5) when controlling for other variables

The jackknife test evaluating the relative importance of each environmental variable showed that Minimum Temperature of Coldest Month (BIO6), followed by Isothermality (BIO3), produced the highest gain when these variables were used alone in the model. Removing Precipitation of the Warmest Quarter (BIO18) from the model reduced gain more than exclusion of any other variable, suggesting that BIO18 improves model fit (Figure A6).
FIGURE A6

Jackknife tests for evaluating the relative importance of each environmental variable in the Reduced 0.5 model. These raw plots created in Maxent show the change in gain when each variable is removed from the full model (light blue bar), or when it is the only variable included (dark blue bar)

Species distribution models – Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans

Our Bsal SDMs all predicted low habitat suitability across our study area, based on extrapolation from Bsal occurrences in Asia and Europe. They predicted very little suitable habitat in southern Ontario, and the highest suitability fell along the coast of Hudson's Bay, at the northern limit of the province. This result was clearly not biologically meaningful and is most likely caused by our attempt to predict future distributions based on data from regions with very different climatic conditions. We therefore discarded our predictive Bsal SDMs and did not pursue this approach further, although the results are presented in the Appendix A (Figure A7) for transparency.
FIGURE A7

Reduced Model output of forecasted habitat suitability for Bsal using the ClogLog distribution using all available occurrence data for Bsal from (a) Asia and Europe, (b) Asia only, (c) Europe only. (d) Classification of Bsal habitat suitability projection based on the model using only Asia and all 29 variables. (<0.25 = no suitability, 0.25–0.5 = low suitability, 0.5–0.75 = moderate suitability, >0.75 = high suitability), based on the methods of Basanta et al. (2019). These results are unlikely to be accurate or informative for making meaningful predictions about Bsal habitat suitability in our study area. We therefore excluded these results from further analyses or interpretation in the main text. However, we have chosen to include them in this Appendix because they highlight the challenges in extrapolating Species Distribution Models among regions with vastly different climates and conditions

Predicted high‐risk areas for Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans impacts

As informative SDMs for our study area could not be produced with the available data, we instead used temperature as a proxy for likely severity of Bsal impacts if the pathogen were introduced, following Carter et al. (2021). Our species richness map (Figure 4a) indicated that 13% of the study area (119,969 km2) is home to ≥4 vulnerable species of salamander. Temperature‐derived risk scores ranged from 1.24 to 3.35 across our study area. The highest predicted risk scores were assigned to an area on the north shore of Lake Superior, followed by all of southern Ontario, and part of the coast of James Bay (Figure 4b). Over 90,123 km2, or 9.8% of the province, had scores ≥2.5 indicating moderate to high vulnerability (Figure 4c). By overlaying areas with ≥4 vulnerable salamander species and areas with temperature‐derived risk scores ≥2.5, we identified high‐risk areas covering 60,530 km2 (6.6% of Ontario) that could be prioritized for Bsal surveillance or mitigation if an introduction occurs (Figure 4c). The two layers overlapped substantially; 50.4% of the area containing ≥4 vulnerable species also fell within the higher temperature vulnerability zone.
FIGURE 4

(a) Salamander richness map of five Urodele species likely susceptible to Bsal. All point data were collected between 1950 and 2020 and are a combination of our records and GBIF occurrences (GBIF, 2020). (b) Temperature‐based Bsal risk scores following Carter et al. (2021). (c) Area of overlap between high species richness (>4 species) and higher temperature risk scores (>=2.5), which covers 60,530 km2

(a) Salamander richness map of five Urodele species likely susceptible to Bsal. All point data were collected between 1950 and 2020 and are a combination of our records and GBIF occurrences (GBIF, 2020). (b) Temperature‐based Bsal risk scores following Carter et al. (2021). (c) Area of overlap between high species richness (>4 species) and higher temperature risk scores (>=2.5), which covers 60,530 km2

DISCUSSION

We used opportunistic sampling to conduct surveillance for two species of chytrid fungus across Ontario and Akimiski Island and used positive Bd cases to model the niche of Bd in the study area. We detected Bd at all sites with ≥18 samples, and in all species with >25 samples. Only one detection was associated with potential clinical signs of chytridiomycosis. We detected Bd from the southernmost part of Ontario, to the Hudson Bay Lowlands in the north, and we found no evidence that Bd prevalence varied with latitude. Our results suggest that Bd is ubiquitous and enzootic across our study area (See also D’Aoust‐Messier et al., 2015; Fisher & Garner, 2020; Ouellet et al., 2005). We were encouraged that we did not detect Bsal in our sampling. Although our Bsal SDMs proved uninformative, they nicely illustrate the risks (as outlined in the Introduction) of constructing predictive SDMs that rely on occurrence records from very different climatic regions. In lieu of SDMs, we were able to more coarsely identify high‐risk areas for Bsal invasion by overlaying temperature‐derived risk scores with range maps of vulnerable species. These results can inform Bsal surveillance in Ontario, and once Bsal occurrence data from more representative locations become available, it will be possible to generate more informative, predictive SDMs. Our estimates of Bd prevalence support previous surveillance work in eastern North America showing persistent occurrence of Bd, with samples collected across Canada (British Colombia, southern Ontario, and Atlantic Canada) detecting Bd prevalence ranging from 13.1–100%, (Forzán et al., 2010; Longcore et al., 2007; McMillan et al., 2020; Ouellet et al., 2005). In our study, the estimated prevalence of Bd should be interpreted as estimates of minimum prevalence. Surveillance based on qPCR can only detect fungal loads above the detection threshold, missing cases where pathogen load is low. We also used skin swabs that are non‐invasive and easy to replicate, but are less sensitive for detecting Batrachochytrium than tissue samples (Schock et al., 2010). These factors all lead to underestimates of true prevalence. Likewise, the results of our SDMs represent minimum estimates of suitable habitat for Bd, because we used a relatively small number of presence points (N = 86; Proosdij et al., 2016). Some areas were also undersampled as they do not have road access and are more difficult to reach. Nondetection of Bd from areas such as the Hudson Bay coast probably reflect low power to detect the pathogen with small sample sizes, rather than lower prevalence in the north. Despite these limitations, we detected Bd as far north as Akimiski Island, which had an average temperature of −1.25°C over our study period, and our most conservative SDM for Bd predicted that suitable habitat extends into the sub‐arctic (54°38′N). Bd grows slowly or not at all at temperatures <4°C, but can overwinter at lower temperatures (Piotrowski et al., 2004). Zoospores have slower rates of growth at lower temperatures, but exhibit longer activity, which may increase encounter rates with amphibian hosts (Voyles et al., 2012; Woodhams et al., 2008). Thus, the thermal sensitivity of Bd allows it to tolerate conditions common to our study area, contrary to previous niche models that identified the boreal and northern parts of North America as unsuitable habitat (Rödder et al., 2010; Xie et al., 2016). Including regionally relevant occurrence data in our Bd SDMs resulted in a much broader predicted niche and highlighted the ubiquity of Bd in our sampling area. Ironically, lack of regionally relevant occurrence data also prevented us from predicting suitable habitat for Bsal. We were still able to broadly identify areas where salamanders would be most at risk from a potential Bsal introduction. However, the maps we generated through this exercise represented a tool to highlight priority areas for surveillance in the event of a Bsal introduction, rather than a prediction of the full, available niche for Bsal in Ontario. Use of these maps to plan surveillance for Bsal must consider three important caveats. First, the species richness layers were created using broad‐scale range maps that did not capture local variation in the distribution of each species. Second, our risk scores for Bsal were derived from experimental infection of N. viridescens (Carter et al., 2021). Use of these risk scores required an explicit, untested assumption: that the effects of Bsal on N. viridescens can be generalized to other susceptible species. Recent work suggests that N. viridescens may be particularly vulnerable to the effects of Bsal, compared to cooccurring Plethodontids (DiRenzo et al., 2021). Our objective was to identify high‐risk areas based on current, available evidence—but these maps should be refined in the future when inter‐specific variation in susceptibility to Bsal and the thermal drivers of disease severity have been quantified. Third, we did not include Ambystoma species when summarizing salamander species richness. Genomic analyses suggest that A. maculatum is not vulnerable to Bsal (Martel et al., 2014). Skin peptides from A. maculatum inhibit the growth of Bsal (Pereira & Woodley, 2021), and experimentally infection with high, repeated doses of Bsal showed resistance across all life stages with no clinical signs of infection (Barnhart et al., 2020). These results suggest Ambystoma are not at risk from Bsal introduction, but future research should confirm whether A. maculatum accurately represents its congeners. Research is also needed to understand whether resistance to Bsal limits the potential for Ambystoma species to act as reservoir hosts for Bsal, or whether Ambystoma could carry and transmit Bsal to co‐occurring, susceptible species. Although Bd was detected across our study area, chytridiomycosis was not—consistent with other studies from eastern North America showing persistent occurrence of Bd in the absence of disease. In southern Ontario, 28.9% of 2,223 L. pipiens tested positive for Bd, but no sick or dead specimens were observed (McMillan et al., 2020). On the east coast of Canada, Bd was detected in 26.9% of 115 sampled amphibians, but only a single, deceased L. sylvaticus exhibited clinical signs of disease (Forzán et al., 2010). Periods of high Bd prevalence in sampled roadkill were also not correlated with documented die‐offs in Maine, USA (Longcore et al., 2007). Chytridiomycosis severity varies with host susceptibility and strain virulence (Eskew et al., 2018; Gahl et al., 2012), and the strain or strains present in our study area may simply be less virulent than those occurring elsewhere. Continued surveillance can assess the potential emergence of more virulent strains, such as that observed in a population of Cascades frogs (Rana cascadae) in northern California (Piovia‐Scott et al., 2015). Nevertheless, although Bd has had severe impacts on many amphibian populations, amphibians in our study area appear to currently co‐exist alongside it with only intermittent outbreaks (Kilpatrick et al., 2010). In contrast, the impacts of a Bsal introduction on salamander in our study area could be severe. Bsal grows optimally at 10–15°C, can survive between 5 and 25°C, and has a lower thermal preference than Bd (Martel et al., 2013). We identified southern Ontario and two regions farther north as likely high‐risk areas in the event of a Bsal introduction. Southern Ontario is one of the most densely populated regions in Canada, and wildlife in this area are already threatened by habitat loss and fragmentation (Paterson et al., 2021). The large cities in southern Ontario represent potential trade routes for introducing Bsal into the country (Stephen et al., 2015), highlighting international trade restrictions as an important policy tool (Auliya et al., 2016; Stegen et al., 2017). As of May 31, 2017, importation of salamanders into Canada was prohibited without a permit (Government of Canada, 2017). However, anurans can carry Bsal without exhibiting clinical signs of disease (Nguyen et al., 2017) and can transmit the pathogen to salamanders with fatal results (Stegen et al., 2017). Expanding trade restrictions to include anurans could further protect native amphibians. In the era of broad‐scale ecological problems that require interdisciplinary solutions, incorporating team science and open science into data‐intensive ecological research can improve the scope and impact of research that can directly inform policy (Cheruvelil & Soranno, 2018). Our study represents a collaboration across research programs and agencies to reach shared goals of infectious disease surveillance. Opportunistic sampling required minimal equipment and expertise and not only provided an extensive dataset, but provided data from remote areas that would have been too costly to reach otherwise. This sampling enabled a more accurate estimate of the Bd niche near the northern range limits of its hosts, established a pre‐introduction baseline for future surveillance for Bsal, and identified priority areas for robust and sustained surveillance. In 2015, the Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative released a report that recommended restricting the import of salamanders to Canada prior to the salamander ban (Stephen et al., 2015), and their recommendations remain relevant. These include not only amending import policies but also applying obligatory testing for Bsal, early detection and containment, and increasing awareness of the pathogen within the pet trade community. The current ban on salamander importation is encouraging, but the potential importation of Bsal on anuran hosts remains a concern. Policy reforms, continued surveillance, and international cooperation will be required to prevent potential introductions into North America and protect native amphibians.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

This study was funded by the Government of Ontario and the Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Lauren Crawshaw: Formal analysis (lead); Visualization (lead); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (equal). Tore Buchanan: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (lead); Project administration (supporting); Resources (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Leonard Shirose: Conceptualization (lead); Methodology (supporting); Project administration (supporting); Resources (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Amanda Palahnuk: Data curation (equal); Investigation (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Hugh Y. Cai: Investigation (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Amanda M. Bennett: Formal analysis (supporting); Writing – review & editing (equal). Claire M. Jardine: Conceptualization (equal); Project administration (supporting); Resources (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Christina M. Davy: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (supporting); Investigation (lead); Methodology (lead); Project administration (lead); Supervision (lead); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (equal).

OPEN RESEARCH BADGES

This article has earned an Open Data Badge for making publicly available the digitally‐shareable data necessary to reproduce the reported results. The data is available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7XNRE.
  43 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal heterogeneity decouples infection parameters of amphibian chytridiomycosis.

Authors:  Kirsten M McMillan; David Lesbarrères; Xavier A Harrison; Trenton W J Garner
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 5.091

2.  Drivers of salamander extirpation mediated by Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans.

Authors:  Gwij Stegen; Frank Pasmans; Benedikt R Schmidt; Lieze O Rouffaer; Sarah Van Praet; Michael Schaub; Stefano Canessa; Arnaud Laudelout; Thierry Kinet; Connie Adriaensen; Freddy Haesebrouck; Wim Bert; Franky Bossuyt; An Martel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and the collapse of anuran species richness and abundance in the Upper Manu National Park, Southeastern Peru.

Authors:  Alessandro Catenazzi; Edgar Lehr; Lily O Rodriguez; Vance T Vredenburg
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Amphibian chytrid fungus and ranaviruses in the Northwest Territories, Canada.

Authors:  Danna M Schock; Gregory R Ruthig; James P Collins; Susan J Kutz; Suzanne Carrière; Robert J Gau; Alasdair M Veitch; Nicholas C Larter; Douglas P Tate; Glen Guthrie; Daniel G Allaire; Richard A Popko
Journal:  Dis Aquat Organ       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.802

5.  Physiology of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, a chytrid pathogen of amphibians.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Piotrowski; Seanna L Annis; Joyce E Longcore
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.696

6.  Correlates of virulence in a frog-killing fungal pathogen: evidence from a California amphibian decline.

Authors:  Jonah Piovia-Scott; Karen Pope; S Joy Worth; Erica Bree Rosenblum; Thomas Poorten; Jeanine Refsnider; Louise A Rollins-Smith; Laura K Reinert; Heather L Wells; Dan Rejmanek; Sharon Lawler; Janet Foley
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 7.  The ecology and impact of chytridiomycosis: an emerging disease of amphibians.

Authors:  A Marm Kilpatrick; Cheryl J Briggs; Peter Daszak
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Mapping species distributions with MAXENT using a geographically biased sample of presence data: a performance assessment of methods for correcting sampling bias.

Authors:  Yoan Fourcade; Jan O Engler; Dennis Rödder; Jean Secondi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Projecting the Global Distribution of the Emerging Amphibian Fungal Pathogen, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, Based on IPCC Climate Futures.

Authors:  Gisselle Yang Xie; Deanna H Olson; Andrew R Blaustein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Collinearity in ecological niche modeling: Confusions and challenges.

Authors:  Xiao Feng; Daniel S Park; Ye Liang; Ranjit Pandey; Monica Papeş
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  1 in total

1.  Widespread occurrence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Ontario, Canada, and predicted habitat suitability for the emerging Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans.

Authors:  Lauren Crawshaw; Tore Buchanan; Leonard Shirose; Amanda Palahnuk; Hugh Y Cai; Amanda M Bennett; Claire M Jardine; Christina M Davy
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.167

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.