| Literature DB >> 35475180 |
Liselotte Wesley Andersen1, Magnus W Jacobsen1,2, Jane Frydenberg3, Julie Dahl Møller4, Thomas Secher Jensen5.
Abstract
Repeated climatic and vegetation changes during the Pleistocene have shaped biodiversity in Northern Europe including Denmark. The Northern Birch Mouse (Sicista betulina) was one of the first small rodent species to colonize Denmark after the Late Glacial Maximum. This study analyses complete mitochondrial genomes and two nuclear genes of the Northern Birch Mouse to investigate the phylogeographical pattern in North-western Europe and test whether the species colonized Denmark through several colonization events. The latter was prompt by (i) the present-day distinct northern and southern Danish distribution and (ii) the subfossil record of Northern Birch Mouse, supporting early Weichselian colonization. Samples from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Russia, Latvia, Estonia, and Slovakia were included. Mitogenomes were obtained from 54 individuals, all representing unique mitogenomes supporting high genetic variation. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis identified two distinct evolutionary linages in Northern Europe diverging within the Elster glaciation period. The results of the two nuclear genomes showed lower genetic differentiation but supported the same evolutionary history. This suggests an allopatric origin of the clades followed by secondary contact. Individuals from southern Denmark were only found in one clade, while individuals from other areas, including northern Denmark, were represented in both clades. Nevertheless, we found no evidence for repeated colonization's explaining the observed fragmented distribution of the species today. The results indicated that the mitogenome pattern of the Northern Birch Mouse population in southern Denmark was either (i) due to the population being founded from northern Denmark, (ii) a result of climatic and anthropogenic effects reducing population size increasing genetic drift or (iii) caused by sampling bias.Entities:
Keywords: Phylogeography; Sicista betulina; divergence time; genetic diversity; mitogenomes; population structure
Year: 2022 PMID: 35475180 PMCID: PMC9022092 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8865
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 3.167
FIGURE 1(a) North‐western Europe about 16,000 years ago (above) and North‐western Europe about 14,000 years ago (below; Aaris‐Sørensen, 2007). (b) the sampling locations of the Northern Birch Mouse analyzed in the study
Sample size (N), Hd (haplotype diversity), π (nucleotide diversity), SD (standard deviation), Tajima D and Fu's F s (Fu, 1997) of the complete mitogenome dataset and for the two nuclear genes, FGB and MYH6, for all analyzed geographical regions of the Northern Birch Mouse
| DKNT | DKS | Sweden | Norway | Estonia | Latvia | Russia | Slovakia | S. Strandi | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitogenomes | |||||||||
| N | 16 | 10 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 |
| H | 16 | 10 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 |
| Hd | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | NA | 1 | 1 | NA |
| SD | 0.022 | 0.045 | 0.063 | 0.177 | 0.126 | NA | 0.177 | 0.126 | NA |
| π % | 2.218 | 0.614 | 2.212 | 1.457 | 3.728 | NA | 1.491 | 3.605 | NA |
| SD % | 0.223 | 0.144 | 0.466 | 0.371 | 0.783 | NA | 0.705 | 0.621 | NA |
| Tajima D | 1.476 | −1.137 | 0.48 | 1.062 | 0.879 | NA | −0.714 | 0.426 | NA |
| Fu's FS | 0.932 | 0.603 | 2.52 | 3.672 | 4.101 | NA | 3.694 | 4.065 | NA |
| MYH6 | |||||||||
| N | 23 | 10 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 1 |
| H | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| Hd | 0.605 | 0.653 | 0.647 | 0.682 | 0.644 | 0.667 | 0.689 | 0.733 | NA |
| SD | 0.042 | 0.065 | 0.069 | 0.091 | 0.101 | 0.204 | 0.104 | 0.12 | NA |
| π % | 0.316 | 0.358 | 0.342 | 0.396 | 0.535 | 0.553 | 0.424 | 0.461 | NA |
| SD % | 0.038 | 0.049 | 0.053 | 0.064 | 0.084 | 0.169 | 0.068 | 0.092 | NA |
| Tajima D | −0.38 | 1.18 | 1.02 | 1.29 | 0.78 | 1.89 | 1.44 | 0.17 | NA |
| Fu's FS | −0.93 | 0.9 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.98 | 1.53 | 0.52 | −0.66 | NA |
| FGB | |||||||||
| N | 24 | 10 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 1 |
| H | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| Hd | 0.301 | 0.353 | 0.549 | 0.303 | 0.644 | 0.833 | 0.6 | 0.538 | NA |
| SD | 0.112 | 0.123 | 0.126 | 0.147 | 0.152 | 0.222 | 0.131 | 0.115 | NA |
| π % | 0.053 | 0.074 | 0.133 | 0.051 | 0.185 | 0.282 | 0.124 | 0.099 | NA |
| SD % | 0.021 | 0.029 | 0.037 | 0.025 | 0.046 | 0.102 | 0.034 | 0.025 | NA |
| Tajima D | −0.59 | 0.24 | −0.28 | −0.19 | 0.1 | 0.17 | 0.12 | −0.2 | NA |
| Fu's FS | −0.62 | 0.65 | −0.67 | −0.27 | −0.69 | −0.13 | −0.1 | −0.37 | NA |
Bold = p < .05 (none). Analyses were conducted in DnaSP and ARLEQUIN (Excoffier & Lischer, 2010; Librado & Rozas, 2009).
DKNT, DK‐North; DKS, DK‐South.
FIGURE 3Phylogenetic tree based on the coding regions of mtDNA of all Northern Birch Mouse samples and one Sicista strandi. Bars represent the 95% lower and upper bound of the posterior density (HPD) interval. Mutation rates are assumed constant and unscaled estimates of divergence time (Time of Most Recent Common Ancestor, TMRCA) are obtained using two different rate estimates to account for possible time‐dependency. The slow and fast mutation rates (μSLOW, μFAST) are both derived from studies on Dipodidae (Cheng et al., 2019; Lebedev et al., 2018) and calculated for the full mitogenome in the present study (slow rate = 1.59%/site/MYR, fast rate = 5.81%/site/MYR). For nonsynonymous changes detected in FUBAR and MEME numbers designate sites of the mutation. Letters after numbers indicates another mutation at that site as indicated with the shading. Vertical and horizontal shading designate different mutations. *Positive sites obtained from selection test performed in MEME at another site compared to the test conducted in FUBAR and observed in exactly the same individuals. #Positive sites and mutations observed in exactly the same individuals as obtained with the selection test conducted in FUBAR. In the legend showing the genes with positive sites for selection, F = FUBAR and M = MEME
Pairwise population structure estimates, ΦST, (below diagonal) based on pairwise differences of complete mitogenomes and ΦST‐FGB (above diagonal) based on sequence variation of the nuclear FGB gene for the different locations (ARLEQUIN 3.5.1; Excoffier & Lischer, 2010)
| DKNT | DKS | Sweden | Estonia | Slovakia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKNT | 0 | 0.002 | 0.097 |
|
|
| DKS | 0.201 | 0 | 0.061 |
| 0.128 |
| Sweden | −0.017 | 0.137 | 0 | 0.255 | 0.148 |
| Estonia | 0.009 |
| 0.035 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Slovakia | 0.045 |
| 0.046 | −0.139 | 0 |
Bold = significant after sequential Bonferroni correction, α = 5% (Rice, 1989).
Results of the pairwise non‐parametric Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests between the cumulative pairwise distribution of nucleotide differences within Sicista betulina mitogenomes sampled in Denmark, Sweden, Estonia, and Slovakia
| DKNT | DKS | Sweden | Estonia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKS |
| |||
| Sweden | 0.256 |
| ||
| Estonia |
|
| 0.493 | |
| Slovakia |
|
|
| 0.5 |
Bold = significant after sequential Bonferroni correction, α = 5% (Rice, 1989).
FIGURE 2Cumulative pairwise distribution curves for the Kolmogorov‐Smirnov test based on the nucleotide differences between the mitogenomes sampled in the seven locations of Northern Birch Mouse. Norway and Russia are included for illustration despite the low sample sizes
IMA results estimated without migration (Hey & Nielsen, 2007) shown for the samples with more than five individuals
| Pop. 1 | Pop. 2 | Divergence time in years | |
|---|---|---|---|
| µ: 7.3%/site/MYR | µ: 2%/site/MYR | ||
| DKNT | DKS | 534 AD (3053 BC–1997 AD) | 3368 BC (16,463 BC–1969 AD) |
| DKNT | Sweden | 8656 BC (12,103 BC–4959 BC) | 36,915 BC (49,595 BC–23,420 BC) |
| DKS | Sweden | 9889 BC (16,458 BC–5314 BC) | 41,413 BC (65,392 BC–24,716 BC) |
The values in brackets denote 90% High Point Density (HPD) intervals for the estimation.
Lebedev et al. (2018).
Cheng et al. (2019).
FIGURE 4The probability of divergence time estimated between the localities with the highest sample sizes, Denmark and Sweden performed in IMa (Hey & Nielsen, 2007). Stippled lines—represents estimates using the fast mutation rate (5.81%/site/MYR, present study), and solid lines represents estimates using the slow mutation rate, 1.58%/site/MYR (present study). Results shown for samples with >5 individuals