| Literature DB >> 35474664 |
Yasuhide Miyoshi1, Sohgo Tsutsumi1, Takashi Kawahara1, Masato Yasui1, Koichi Uemura1, Shuko Yoneyama1, Yumiko Yokomizo2, Narihiko Hayashi2, Masahiro Yao2, Hiroji Uemura1.
Abstract
Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate automated bone scan index (aBSI) as a prognostic biomarker for overall survival (OS) in bone-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with radium-223 (Ra-223). Materials and methods: We identified 42 men treated with Ra-223 for mCRPC. We investigated aBSI as an independent prognostic factor by multivariate analysis. Moreover, we evaluated the prognostic value of the aBSI after 12 weeks after the first cycle of Ra-223 administration and aBSI change from baseline to after 12 weeks (ΔBSI).Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35474664 PMCID: PMC8988825 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.43
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BJUI Compass ISSN: 2688-4526
Patient characteristics
| Variables | ||
|---|---|---|
| Gleason scores at initial biopsy | ≤7 | 8 (19.0%) |
| 8‐10 | 33 (78.6%) | |
| Unknown | 1 (2.4%) | |
| Median age (range), years | 75.5 (57.4‐87.0) | |
| Median time to CRPC (range), months | 11.2 (1.8‐119.9) | |
| Median aBSI (range), % | 1.5 (0.0‐11.5) | |
| Median PSA (range), ng/mL | 42.8 (0.3‐1795.0) | |
| Mets of extra‐bone, n (%) | Yes | 9 (21.4%) |
| Previous use of docetaxel, n (%) | Yes | 9 (21.4%) |
| ECOG performance status, n (%) | 0‐1 | 40 (95.2%) |
| 2 | 1 (2.4%) | |
| Unknown | 1 (2.4%) | |
| Pain, n (%) | Yes | 27 (64.3%) |
| Concomitant use of BMA, n (%) | Yes | 25 (59.5%) |
| Previous use of BIC/FLU | Yes | 42 (100%) |
| Concomitant use of BIC/FLU, n (%) | Yes | 0 (0.0%) |
| Previous use of ABI/ENZ | Yes | 13 (41.0%) |
| Concomitant use of ABI/ENZ, n (%) | Yes | 9 (21.4%) |
Abbreviations: ABI, abiraterone acetate; aBSI, automated bone scan index; BIC, bicalutamide; BMA, bone‐modified agent; CRPC, castration‐resistant prostate cancer; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; ENZ, enzalutamide; FLU, flutamide; Mets, metastases; PSA, prostate‐specific antigen.
Previous use of BIC/FLU indicate administration of BIC/FLU for hormone‐naïve prostate cancer;
Previous use of ABI/ENZ indicate administration of ABI/ENZ for CRPC.
FIGURE 1The correlation between aBSI and EOD classifications which counted manually. There was a significant correlation between those two variables. The correlation coefficient was 0.85
FIGURE 2A, Kaplan‐Meier curve for overall survival (OS) among men treated with Radium‐223 (n = 42). Median OS was 20.7 months. B, Kaplan‐Meier curve for overall survival (OS) among men treated with Radium‐223 according to baseline aBSI levels. Median OS among men with < 1.5% baseline aBSI was 34.8 months (n = 22) and 14.2 months in men with ≥ 1.5% baseline aBSI (n = 20). There was a significant OS difference between men with < 1.5% baseline aBSI and with ≥ 1.5% baseline aBSI (P < .01)
Evaluation of baseline aBSI for predicting OS in patients treated with radium‐223 by univariate and multivariate analysis
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| HR | 95.0% CI |
| HR | 95.0% CI | |||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||||
| Age > 75.5 years vs ≤ 75.5 | .10 | 0.46 | 0.19 | 1.15 | .28 | 0.54 | 0.18 | 1.66 |
| Time to CRPC < 11.2 months vs ≥ 11.2 | .91 | 1.05 | 0.44 | 2.52 | .86 | 1.11 | 0.36 | 3.42 |
| Previous use of docetaxel, Yes vs no | .87 | 0.91 | 0.32 | 2.59 | .71 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 4.62 |
| Baseline PSA > 42.8 ng/mL vs ≤ 42.8 | .03 | 2.82 | 1.12 | 7.12 | .23 | 2.06 | 0.64 | 6.68 |
| Gleason sum 9‐10 vs 6‐8 | .73 | 1.24 | 0.35 | 4.40 | .85 | 1.15 | 0.27 | 4.92 |
| Baseline aBSI > 1.5% vs ≤ 1.5 | .01 | 4.31 | 1.53 | 12.15 | .03 | 3.72 | 1.17 | 11.79 |
Abbreviations: aBSI, automated bone scan index; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; CI, confidence interval; CRPC, castration‐resistant prostate cancer; HR, hazard ratio; PSA, prostate‐specific antigen.
FIGURE 3Waterfall plot of bone scan index change from baseline after 12 weeks of Radium‐223 (Ra‐223) treatment (n = 31). Black and gray bars indicate the patients treated with Ra‐223 combined with abiraterone acetate (ABI) or enzalutamide (ENZ) and without use, respectively
Evaluation of both aBSI at 12 weeks after first cycle of installation and ΔBSI (aBSI change from baseline to 12 weeks after) for predicting OS among men treated with radium‐223 by univariate and multivariate analysis
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| HR | 95.0% CI |
| HR | 95.0% CI | |||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||||
| aBSI after 12 weeks (≥2.0% vs < 2.0%) | <.01 | 10.20 | 2.19 | 47.57 | <.01 | 13.07 | 2.61 | 65.53 |
| aBSI change after 12 weeks (increase vs decrease) | .75 | 0.84 | 0.29 | 2.42 | .20 | 0.47 | 0.15 | 1.48 |
Abbreviation: aBSI, automated bone scan index.
FIGURE 4Kaplan‐Meier curve for overall survival (OS) among men treated with Radium‐223 who received a bone scan 12 weeks after treatment with respect to aBSI levels. (n = 31). Median OS in men with < 2.0% aBSI after 12 weeks was not reached (n = 16) and 13.6 months in men with ≥ 1.5% aBSI after 12 weeks (n = 15). There was a significant OS difference between men with < 2.0% aBSI after 12 weeks and men with ≥ 2.0% aBSI after 12 weeks (P < .01)