| Literature DB >> 35474343 |
B Lledo1, A Fuentes2, F M Lozano3, A Cascales3, R Morales3, M Hortal3, F Sellers2,4, A Palacios-Marques4,5,6, R Bermejo7,8, F Quereda7,8, J C Martínez-Escoriza5,6, R Bernabeu2, A Bernabeu2.
Abstract
The factors that cause a preterm birth (PTB) are not completely understood up to date. Moreover, PTB is more common in pregnancies achieved by in-vitro fertilization (IVF) than in spontaneous pregnancies. Our aim was to compare the composition of vaginal microbiome at 12 weeks of gestation between women who conceived naturally or through IVF in order to study whether IVF PTB-risk could be related to vaginal microbiome composition. We performed an observational, prospective and multicentre study among two public hospitals and a fertility private clinic in Spain. Vaginal swabs from 64 pregnant women at 12 weeks of gestation were collected to analyse the microbiome composition by sequencing the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA. Our results showed that the vaginal microbiome signature at 12 weeks of pregnancy was different from women who conceived naturally or through IVF. The beta diversity and the genus composition were different between both cohorts. Gardnerella, Neisseria, Prevotella, and Staphylococcus genus were enriched genus in the vaginal microbiome from the IVF group, allowing us to create a balance model to predict both cohorts. Moreover, at species level the L. iners abundance was higher and L. gasseri was lower in the IVF group. As a conclusion, our findings were consistent with a proposed framework in which IVF pregnancy are related to risk for preterm birth (PTB) suggesting vaginal microbiome could be the reason to the relation between IVF pregnancy and risk for PTB.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35474343 PMCID: PMC9042930 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10933-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Patient demographic and clinical information.
| All women | Spontaneous pregnancy | IVF pregnancy | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal age (year) (average ± SD) | 36.2 ± 4.95 | 33.8 ± 4.57 | 38.9 ± 4.26 | |
| Body mass index (BMI) (average ± SD) | 24.28 ± 5.99 | 24.87 ± 5.85 | 23.73 ± 4.07 | 0.3776 |
| Previous pregnancies (%) | 56.25 | 56.67 | 55.88 | 0.9497 |
| No previous gynaecological pathologies (%) | 84.4 | 90.0 | 79.41 | 0.430 |
| Previous uterine surgery (%) | 6.25 | 6.67 | 5.88 | 0.8971 |
| Previous c-section (%) | 22.72 | 29.41 | 20.0 | 0.572 |
| Previous bad obstetrical history (%) | 37.5 | 23.30 | 43.33 | 0.1572 |
| Previous healthy babies (%) | 34.38 | 53.33 | 17.65 | |
| Previous infertility history (%) | 46.88 | 6.67 | 82.35 | |
| Pregnancy complications (%) | 38.10 | 40.0 | 36.4 | 0.375 |
| Amniotic sac rupture (%) | 35.48 | 31.03 | 39.40 | 0.4924 |
| Preterm birth (%) | 12.50 | 6.67 (2) | 17.64 (6) | 0.2031 |
| Healthy baby born (%) | 98.4 | 100 | 96.97 | 0.5221 |
| Neonatal complications (%) | 8.20 | 7.14 | 9.38 | 0.6187 |
p-value < 0.05 are given in bold.
Figure 1Diversity analysis. (a) Alpha diversity indexes boxplots between both cohorts (IVF vs spontaneous). Different indexes are shown. Using two-sided Wilcoxon’s test followed by a P value adjustment using Bonferroni’s correction with 5% FDR. Boxes show median and interquartile range. (b) Beta diversity. Principal coordinates analysis (PCOA) between IVF and spontaneous cohorts. The figure shows the three-dimensional diagram of PCOA, in which each dot represents a sample, and each colour represents a group: red for spontaneous pregnancy group and blue for IVF group. PC1 is the principal coordinate component causing the largest difference in samples, with an explanatory value of 37.02%. PC2 and PC3 were next, with an explanatory value of 11.63% and 9.47%, respectively.
Figure 2Composition of the bacterial community at the genus level. (a) By cohort. (b) By differential taxa abundances. The plot shows the log2-fold changes for genus-level bacterial that were statistically significant at the 0.01 level using the Wald test with Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment as implemented in DESeq2. Each data point represents a genus-level (y-axis) identified as significantly different along with the log2 fold change (x-axis). Negative values indicate the log2 fold change for taxa underrepresented in vaginal microbiome at 12 weeks from patients with a spontaneous pregnancy. (c) By global balance. The two groups of taxa that form the global balance are specified at the top of the plot. The box plot represents the distribution of the balance scores for IVF and spontaneous pregnancies. The right part of the figure contains the ROC curve with its AUC value (0.71) and the density curve for each group.
Figure 3Composition of the bacterial community. (a) At the Lactobacillus level. Boxplots showing the % of read abundance of Lactobacillus genus in vaginal microbiome at 12 weeks in the IVF vs in the spontaneous pregnancy group. Asterisks show statistical significant two-sided Wilcoxon’s test. (b) At the CST level. Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) ordination based on Bray Curtis non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) dissimilarities permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) 999 permutations; p-value < 0.001). Samples belonging to different CSTs are indicated with different colour dots. (c) A heatmap of relative abundance of the top 25 species found in the vaginal samples of pregnant women at 12 weeks included in our study. Each vertical line represents 1 sample. CST, community state type, IVF and spontaneous group.