| Literature DB >> 24987521 |
Roberto Romero1, Sonia S Hassan2, Pawel Gajer3, Adi L Tarca4, Douglas W Fadrosh5, Janine Bieda6, Piya Chaemsaithong4, Jezid Miranda4, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa7, Jacques Ravel3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to determine whether the vaginal microbiota of pregnant women who subsequently had a spontaneous preterm delivery is different from that of women who had a term delivery.Entities:
Keywords: Histologic chorioamnionitis; Infection-induced preterm delivery; Prematurity; Vaginal flora; Vaginal microbiome
Year: 2014 PMID: 24987521 PMCID: PMC4066267 DOI: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Clinical and demographic characteristics of the study population
| Age (years) | 24 (21.8-28) | 21 (20–26) | 0.1 |
| Race: | | | |
| African American | 62 (86.1%) | 17 (94.4%) | 0.7 |
| White | 4 (5.6%) | 1 (5.6%) | |
| Others | 6 (8.3%) | 0 | |
| Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m2) | 28.7 (25.7-35.3)* | 25.7 (21.6-33.6)** | 0.2 |
| Nulliparity | 18 (25%) | 7 (38.9%) | 0.3 |
| Gestational age at delivery (weeks) | 39.6 (38.8-40.7) | 30.5 (28–33.1) | 0.001 |
| Birthweight (grams) | 3295 (3124.3-3538.8) | 1402.5 (997.5-1998.8) | 0.001 |
| Apgar score at 1 min | 9 (8–9) | 6 (3–8) | 0.001 |
| Apgar score at 5 min | 9 (9–9) | 8 (6–8) | 0.001 |
| Duration of hospital stay (neonates); in days | 3 (3–3)** | 26 (13–53)*** | 0.001 |
Data presented as median (interquartile range) or n (%).
BMI: body mass index.
Missing data: *n = 4, **n = 6, ***n = 1.
Phylotypes differential relative abundance between pregnant women who delivered preterm and at term
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 6017.7 | NA | 1160.3 | ZINBLME | 2.524 | 0.341 | 4.706 | 12.5 | 0.0239 | 0.3850 |
| | 3934.3 | 4142.6 | 1346.3 | ZINBLME | 1.630 | −0.002 | 3.261 | 5.1 | 0.0502 | 0.3850 |
| | 2875.4 | NA | 1121.2 | ZINBLME | 1.510 | −0.033 | 3.053 | 4.5 | 0.0550 | 0.3850 |
| | 4338.8 | NA | 1242.3 | ZINBLME | 1.339 | −0.458 | 3.136 | 3.8 | 0.1422 | 0.5972 |
| | 4753.1 | NA | 1296.3 | ZINBLME | 1.327 | −0.225 | 2.879 | 3.8 | 0.0927 | 0.4867 |
| BVAB2 | 12246 | NA | 1686.4 | ZINBLME | 1.129 | −0.784 | 3.041 | 3.1 | 0.2440 | 0.7046 |
| | 54150 | NA | 2859 | ZINBLME | 1.040 | −0.518 | 2.597 | 2.8 | 0.1880 | 0.6580 |
| BVAB1 | 116789 | NA | 2467.9 | ZINBLME | 0.915 | −0.976 | 2.807 | 2.5 | 0.3389 | 0.7046 |
| | 38178 | NA | 2860.1 | ZINBLME | 0.717 | −0.864 | 2.298 | 2.0 | 0.3700 | 0.7046 |
| | 3433.2 | 4330.8 | 1529.3 | ZINBLME | 0.625 | −0.738 | 1.987 | 1.9 | 0.3648 | 0.7046 |
| | 2309.1 | NA | 1405.6 | ZINBLME | 0.550 | −0.800 | 1.899 | 1.7 | 0.4206 | 0.7046 |
| | 193277 | 166894 | 4311.4 | ZINBLME | 0.520 | −0.961 | 2.000 | 1.7 | 0.4874 | 0.7046 |
| | 18185 | 17841 | 2505.6 | ZINBLME | 0.383 | −1.107 | 1.872 | 1.5 | 0.6108 | 0.7987 |
| | NA | NA | 2625.8 | ZINBLME | 0.376 | −1.249 | 2.001 | 1.5 | 0.6466 | 0.7987 |
| | 159892 | 125388 | 3788 | ZINBLME | 0.157 | −1.784 | 2.098 | 1.2 | 0.8724 | 0.9068 |
| | 263630 | 194492 | 6324.8 | ZINBLME | 0.045 | −0.721 | 0.811 | 1.0 | 0.9068 | 0.9068 |
| | 2926.9 | NA | 1405.3 | ZINBLME | −0.189 | −1.724 | 1.345 | −1.2 | 0.8069 | 0.8918 |
| | 2682.8 | NA | 1149.1 | ZINBLME | −0.293 | −1.940 | 1.354 | −1.3 | 0.7248 | 0.8456 |
| | 1866.8 | NA | 1184.9 | ZINBLME | −0.374 | −1.480 | 0.732 | −1.5 | 0.5033 | 0.7046 |
| | 1386.9 | NA | 883.8 | ZINBLME | −0.522 | −1.910 | 0.865 | −1.7 | 0.4567 | 0.7046 |
| | 34741 | NA | 1592.4 | ZINBLME | −0.864 | −2.847 | 1.118 | −2.4 | 0.3887 | 0.7046 |
aPLME: Poisson Linear Mixed Effects Model.
bNBLME: Negative Binomial Linear Mixed Effects.
cZINBLME: Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Mixed-Effects Model.
dAIC: Akaike Information Criterion.
eq-value is p-value after adjustment for false-discovery rate (0.1).
Figure 1Heatmap of microbial taxa relative abundance identified in the vaginal microbiota of women who delivered at term and women who delivered preterm. Ward linkage clustering of samples based on the composition and relative abundance of the 25 most abundant species in the vaginal microbiota that define community state types is shown above the heatmap.
Figure 2Profiles of community state types for women who delivered at term and women who delivered preterm as a function of the gestational age. Each sample in the longitudinal series was assigned to community state types as defined in Figure 1 and is indicated by a rectangle colored according to the legend shown above. Time of delivery is depicted by a light blue circle.