Literature DB >> 35472749

Exposure assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in refined coal tar sealant applications.

Seth McCormick1, John E Snawder2, I-Chen Chen3, Jonathan Slone4, Antonia M Calafat5, Yuesong Wang5, Lei Meng5, Marissa Alexander-Scott2, Michael Breitenstein2, Belinda Johnson2, Juliana Meadows2, Cheryl Fairfield Estill3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Refined coal tar sealant (RCTS) emulsions are used to seal the surface of asphalt pavement. Nine of the 22 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) evaluated in this study are classified as known, probable, or possible human carcinogens. Exposure assessment research for RCTS workers has not been published previously.
OBJECTIVES: The overall objective of this study was to develop a representative occupational exposure assessment of PAH exposure for RCTS workers based on worksite surveys. The specific aims were to: 1) quantify full-shift airborne occupational exposures to PAHs among RCTS workers; 2) quantify workers' dermal exposures to PAHs; 3) quantify biomarkers of PAH exposure in workers' urine; 4) identify specific job titles associated with RCTS exposure; and 5) apply these results to a biological exposure index to assess risk of potential genotoxicity from occupational exposures.
METHODS: A total of twenty-one RCTS workers were recruited from three companies. Personal and area air samples were collected using a modification of NIOSH Method 5515. Dermal exposure was assessed by hand and neck wipes before and after shifts. Twenty-two PAHs were quantified via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry selected ion monitoring. Internal dose was estimated by quantifying select PAH metabolites in pre- and post-shift urine samples using on-line solid phase extraction-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
RESULTS: PAH levels in the worker breathing zones were highest for naphthalene, acenaphthene, and phenanthrene, with geometric means of 52.1, 11.4, and 9.8 μg/m3, respectively. Hand wipe levels of phenanthrene, fluoranthene and pyrene were the highest among the 22 PAHs with geometric means of 7.9, 7.7, and 5.5 μg/cm2, respectively. Urinary PAH biomarkers for naphthalene, fluorene, phenanthrene, and pyrene were detected in all workers and were higher for post-shift samples than those collected pre-shift. Urinary concentrations of the metabolite 1-hydroxypyrene were greater than the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Biological Exposure Index (BEI) for this metabolite in 89 percent of post-shift samples collected on the final day of the work week or field survey. Statistically significances were found between concentrations of fluorene, naphthalene, and phenanthrene in the breathing zone of workers and their corresponding urinary PAH biomarkers. Workers were placed in two work place exposure groups: applicators and non-applicators. Applicators had higher total PAH concentrations in personal breathing zone (PBZ) air samples than non-applicators and were more likely to have post-shift hand wipe concentrations significantly higher than pre-shift concentrations. Concentrations of post-shift urinary biomarkers were higher, albeit not significantly, for applicators than non-applicators.
CONCLUSIONS: The exposure results from RCTS worker samples cannot be explained by proximal factors such as nearby restaurants or construction. Air and skin concentration levels were substantially higher for RCTS workers than previously published levels among asphalt workers for all PAHs. PAH profiles on skin wipes were more consistent with RCTS sealant product than air samples. Last day post-shift urinary concentrations of 1-hydroxypyrene greatly exceeded the ACGIH BEI benchmark of 2.5 μg/L in 25 of 26 samples, which suggests occupational exposure and risk of genotoxicity. When pyrene and benzo[a]pyrene were both detected, concentration ratios from personal exposure samples were used to calculate the adjusted BEI. Concentrations of 1-hydroxypyrene exceeded the adjusted BEIs for air, hand wipes, and neck wipes in most cases. These results indicate the need to increase safety controls and exposure mitigation for RCTS workers.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coal tar sealants; N-heterocycles; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35472749      PMCID: PMC9169065          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2022.113971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   7.401


  23 in total

1.  Contamination of firefighter personal protective equipment and skin and the effectiveness of decontamination procedures.

Authors:  Kenneth W Fent; Barbara Alexander; Jennifer Roberts; Shirley Robertson; Christine Toennis; Deborah Sammons; Stephen Bertke; Steve Kerber; Denise Smith; Gavin Horn
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.

Authors:  Gary H Ganser; Paul Hewett
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Dermal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons among road pavers.

Authors:  Virpi Väänänen; Mervi Hämeilä; Pentti Kalliokoski; Elina Nykyri; Pirjo Heikkilä
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2005-03

4.  The association of pipe and cigar use with cotinine levels, lung function, and airflow obstruction: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Josanna Rodriguez; Rui Jiang; W Craig Johnson; Barbara A MacKenzie; Lewis J Smith; R Graham Barr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  A realistic human skin model to study benzo[a]pyrene cutaneous absorption in order to determine the most relevant biomarker for carcinogenic exposure.

Authors:  Etienne Bourgart; Damien Barbeau; Marie Marques; Anne von Koschembahr; David Béal; Renaud Persoons; Marie-Thérèse Leccia; Thierry Douki; Anne Maitre
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 6.  Cancer risk assessment, indicators, and guidelines for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the ambient air.

Authors:  Carl-Elis Boström; Per Gerde; Annika Hanberg; Bengt Jernström; Christer Johansson; Titus Kyrklund; Agneta Rannug; Margareta Törnqvist; Katarina Victorin; Roger Westerholm
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Urinary 1-hydroxypyrene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure among asphalt paving workers.

Authors:  M D McClean; R D Rinehart; L Ngo; E A Eisen; K T Kelsey; J K Wiencke; R F Herrick
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2004-08-03

Review 8.  Overview of Cotinine Cutoff Values for Smoking Status Classification.

Authors:  Sungroul Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Quantile regression for exposure data with repeated measures in the presence of non-detects.

Authors:  I-Chen Chen; Stephen J Bertke; Brian D Curwin
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.563

10.  Overview of Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds (PAC).

Authors:  Christine Achten; Jan T Andersson
Journal:  Polycycl Aromat Compd       Date:  2015-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.