| Literature DB >> 35471912 |
Matthew R Zanotelli1,2, Jian Zhang2, Ismael Ortiz2, Wenjun Wang2, Neil C Chada2, Cynthia A Reinhart-King2.
Abstract
Altered tissue mechanics and metabolism have gained significant attention as drivers of tumorigenesis, and mechanoresponsive metabolism has been implicated in migration and metastasis. However, heterogeneity in cell populations makes it difficult to link changes in behavior with metabolism, as individual cell behaviors are not necessarily reflected in population-based measurements. As such, the impact of increased collagen deposition, a tumor-associated collagen signature, on metabolism remains ambiguous. Here, we utilize a wide range of collagen densities to alter migration ability and study the bioenergetics of individual cells over time. Sorting cells based on their level of motility revealed energetics are a function of collagen density only for highly motile cells, not the entire population or cells with low motility. Changes in migration with increasing collagen density were correlated with cellular energetics, where matrix conditions most permissive to migration required less energy usage during movement and migrated more efficiently. These findings reveal a link between matrix mechanics, migratory phenotype, and bioenergetics and suggest that energetic costs are determined by the extracellular matrix and influence cell motility.Entities:
Keywords: cell migration; extracellular matrix; heterogeneity; mechanobiology; metabolism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35471912 PMCID: PMC9170068 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2114672119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 12.779
Fig. 1.Migration activity influences metabolism with changes in collagen density. (A) Distribution of highly motile (HM), lowly motile (LM), and proliferating (P) cells with collagen density (n = 212, 251, 264, 224, 221, 226, and 78). (B) Pore diameter (n = 30), (C) cell elongation, (D) net migration, (E) normalized AlamarBlue fluorescence vs. motile fraction, (F) normalized PercevalHR ratio, and (G) normalized PercevalHR vs. motile fraction with collagen density (n = 126, 167, 167, 160, 149, 164, and 31). (H) ATP:ADP heat map, (I) normalized PercevalHR, and (J) normalized PercevalHR vs. net distance of HM (n = 55, 85, 78, 52, 33, and 16) and LM cells (n = 71, 82, 99, 115, 121, and 150). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, ***P < 0.0001, n.s. = not significant. (Scale bar, 15 μm.).
Fig. 2.Energy costs during migration drive migration ability. (A) ATP:ADP and velocity fluctuations of individual cells and (B) ATP:ADP change vs. velocity change with collagen density. (C) ATP:ADP and velocity measurements in 0.75 mg⋅mL−1 and the cross-correlation factor (XCF) vs. time (n = 39). (D) ATP:ADP area vs. total distance across collagen densities. (E) Energy efficiency of migration in each collagen density and (F) its relationship with motile fraction (n = 28, 39, 38, 28, 27, and 32). *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.0001.