| Literature DB >> 31091287 |
Paul V Taufalele1, Jacob A VanderBurgh2, Adam Muñoz1, Matthew R Zanotelli2, Cynthia A Reinhart-King1,2.
Abstract
Aligned collagen architecture is a characteristic feature of the tumor extracellular matrix (ECM) and has been shown to facilitate cancer metastasis using 3D in vitro models. Additional features of the ECM, such as pore size and stiffness, have also been shown to influence cellular behavior and are implicated in cancer progression. While there are several methods to produce aligned matrices to study the effect on cell behavior in vitro, it is unclear how the alignment itself may alter these other important features of the matrix. In this study, we have generated aligned collagen matrices and characterized their pore sizes and mechanical properties at the micro- and macro-scale. Our results indicate that collagen alignment can alter pore-size of matrices depending on the polymerization temperature of the collagen. Furthermore, alignment does not affect the macro-scale stiffness but alters the micro-scale stiffness in a temperature independent manner. Overall, these results describe the manifestation of confounding variables that arise due to alignment and the importance of fully characterizing biomaterials at both micro- and macro-scales.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31091287 PMCID: PMC6519824 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216537
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The effects of temperature on collagen alignment.
(A) Representative confocal reflectance images. (B) Pseudo-color confocal reflectance images depicting fiber orientations. The 0° mark indicates the direction the beads were pulled to induce alignment. (C) Representative histograms depicting fiber orientation distributions generated from the OrientationJ plugin in ImageJ. (D) Quantifications of the collagen alignment via 2 methods: aspect ratio and orientation index. N = 6–7; n = 36–42. Data presented as mean ± s.d.
Fig 2The effects of collagen alignment at different temperatures on pore size.
(A) Representative confocal reflectance images of aligned & random collagen gels gelled at 25°C and 37°C. Cropped and magnified images are included to the right of the images. Scale bars = 50 μm. Collagen pore size quantified by autocorrelation methods (B) and erosion-based methods (C). N = 6–7; n = 36–42. Data presented as mean ± s.d. (D) Erosion-based quantification process. Representative confocal reflectance image of collagen architecture is transformed into a skeletonized binary image with black pixels depicting fibers. Pores are produced by erosion of the skeletonized binary image.
Fig 3Mechanical properties of aligned and random collagen matrices at different temperatures.
(A) Equilibrium modulus of gels measured by confined compression. Data presented as mean ± SEM. N = 8–16; n = 8–16. (B) Young’s modulus of gels measured by AFM. Data presented as median ± interquartile range (box), 10th-90th percentile (whiskers), and mean (+) with outliers represented as points. N = 4; n = 335–379.