| Literature DB >> 35471638 |
Zhenxiang Zang1,2, Tianbin Song1,2, Jiping Li3, Shaozhen Yan1,2, Binbin Nie4, Shanshan Mei5, Jie Ma1,2, Yu Yang1,2, Baoci Shan4, Yuqing Zhang3, Jie Lu1,2.
Abstract
Neurodegeneration of the substantia nigra affects putamen activity in Parkinson's disease (PD), yet in vivo evidence of how the substantia nigra modulates putamen glucose metabolism in humans is missing. We aimed to investigate how substantia nigra modulates the putamen glucose metabolism using a cross-sectional design. Resting-state fMRI, susceptibility-weighted imaging, and [18 F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET (FDG-PET) data were acquired. Forty-two PD patients and 25 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited for simultaneous PET/MRI scanning. The main measurements of the current study were R 2 * images representing iron deposition (28 PD and 25 HCs), standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) images representing FDG-uptake (33 PD and 25 HCs), and resting state functional connectivity maps from resting state fMRI (34 PD and 25 HCs). An interaction term based on the general linear model was used to investigate the joint modulation effect of nigral iron deposition and nigral-putamen functional connectivity on putamen FDG-uptake. Compared with HCs, we found increased iron deposition in the substantia nigra (p = .007), increased FDG-uptake in the putamen (left: PFWE < 0.001; right: PFWE < 0.001), and decreased functional connectivity between the substantia nigra and the anterior putamen (left PFWE < 0.001, right: PFWE = 0.007). We then identified significant interaction effect of nigral iron deposition and nigral-putamen connectivity on FDG-uptake in the putamen (p = .004). The current study demonstrated joint modulation effect of the substantia nigra iron deposition and nigral-putamen functional connectivity on putamen glucose metabolic distribution, thereby revealing in vivo pathological mechanism of nigrostriatal neurodegeneration of PD.Entities:
Keywords: Parkinson's disease; nigral iron deposition; nigrostriatal functional connectivity; putamen metabolism distribution
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35471638 PMCID: PMC9294292 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25880
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Brain Mapp ISSN: 1065-9471 Impact factor: 5.399
Demographic information of subjects
| Healthy controls | Parkinson's disease |
| Test statistics | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 25 | 34 (42 recruited) | ||
| Sex (m/f) | 8/17 | 13/21 | .62 |
|
| Age (±SD) | 60.00 ± 4.54 | 62.32 ± 6.40 | .13 |
|
| FD power (±SD) | 0.22 ± 0.09 | 0.21 ± 0.08 | .60 |
|
| HY‐stage (±SD) | 3.00 ± 0.83 | |||
| UPDRSIII (±SD) | 59.71 ± 15.00 | |||
| Disease duration (±SD) | 9.59 ± 4.04 |
Note: Mean ± standard deviations are shown.
Abbreviations: FD, frame‐wise displacement; HY‐stage, Hoehn and Yahr stage; UPDRSIII, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale—III.
FIGURE 1Increased SN iron deposition panel (a) shows the spatial distribution of increased iron deposition in the bilateral substantia nigra with a p < .005 uncorrected threshold. Please note that (a) was only for illustration purpose and we did not perform further statistical analyses. Panel (b) shows the bar plot of averaged iron deposition extracted from the bilateral substantia nigra ROI. There was an increased iron deposition in PD group (p = .007). Further statistical analyses as well as inference was based on the results showing in Figure 2b. Error bars represent standard error. Age and SN‐GMV were controlled as covariates of non‐interests
FIGURE 2Increased putamen FDG uptake. Panel (a) shows the p < .05 corrected results of increased FDG uptake in the bilateral putamen. Results were masked with bilateral putamen from the AAL template. Age was controlled as covariates of non‐interests. Panel (b) shows the bar plot of averaged putamen SUVr extracted from the clusters shown in panel (a). Error bars represent standard errors
FIGURE 3Decreased SN‐PUT FC. Panel (a) shows p < .05 corrected results of decreased FC between the substantia nigra and the putamen (14 voxels, masked by bilateral putamen of the AAL template). Age and FD were controlled as covariates of non‐interests. Panel (b) shows the post hoc bar plots of the peak voxel in the putamen (error bars are standard errors). Panel (c) shows the regression plot between the peak FC [−18, 18, −6] and the HY‐stage (R = −0.35, p = .04)
FIGURE 4Association between SN‐PUT connectivity and SN iron deposition. Figure shows the partial regression plot of iron deposition in the substantia nigra and peak FC [−18, 18, −6] (R = −0.29, p = .04, group and SN‐GMV as covariates of non‐interests)
FIGURE 5SN iron deposition and SN‐PUT connectivity jointly modulate putamen FDG‐uptake. Figure illustrates the significant interaction effect of nigral iron deposition and nigral‐putamen connectivity on FDG‐uptake in the putamen (p = .004). Panel (a) displays the concept chart‐flow of the joint modulation effect. Panel (b) shows the partial regression plot of putamen FDG‐uptake and Iron*FC joint effect from the general linear model. Group and SN‐GMV were controlled as covariates of non‐interests