| Literature DB >> 35468793 |
A Creemers1,2, A P van der Zalm1,2, A van de Stolpe3, L Holtzer3, M Stoffels4, G K J Hooijer5, E A Ebbing1, H van Ooijen4, A G C van Brussel3, E M G Aussems-Custers4, M I van Berge Henegouwen6, M C C M Hulshof7, J J G H M Bergman8, S L Meijer5, M F Bijlsma1,9, H W M van Laarhoven10,11.
Abstract
In this study we aimed to investigate signaling pathways that drive therapy resistance in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Paraffin-embedded material was analyzed in two patient cohorts: (i) 236 EAC patients with a primary tumor biopsy and corresponding post neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) resection; (ii) 66 EAC patients with resection and corresponding recurrence. Activity of six key cancer-related signaling pathways was inferred using the Bayesian inference method. When assessing pre- and post-nCRT samples, lower FOXO transcriptional activity was observed in poor nCRT responders compared to good nCRT responders (p = 0.0017). This poor responder profile was preserved in recurrences compared to matched resections (p = 0.0007). PI3K pathway activity, inversely linked with FOXO activity, was higher in CRT poor responder cell lines compared to CRT good responders. Poor CRT responder cell lines could be sensitized to CRT using PI3K inhibitors. To conclude, by using a novel method to measure signaling pathway activity on clinically available material, we identified an association of low FOXO transcriptional activity with poor response to nCRT. Targeting this pathway sensitized cells for nCRT, underlining its feasibility to select appropriate targeted therapies.Entities:
Keywords: Esophageal adenocarcinoma; Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy; Pathway analysis; Predictive
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35468793 PMCID: PMC9036728 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03376-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 8.440
Fig. 1Patient selection. A Selection of matched pre-treatment biopsies and post treatment resection specimens of EAC patients in the Amsterdam UMC between June 2004 and May 2013. Samples were excluded due to availability or insufficient tumor tissue (shown in right panel). Included samples in lower panels. The screening panel indicates the number of patients, in subsequent other panels the numbers represent number of specimens. B Selection of matched resected primary tumor site and metachronous recurrence of EAC patients, as in A. QC: quality control
Patient characteristcs of the resectable (i) and recurrent (ii) cohort
| Resectable cohort (i) | Recurrent cohort (ii) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 236 | 100% | n = 66 | 100% | |
| Mean age at dianosis | 57.6 | (36–81) | 64.7 | (40–85) |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 200 | 84.7 | 51 | 77.3 |
| Female | 36 | 15.3 | 15 | 22.7 |
| Location | ||||
| Proximal | 1 | 0.4 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Mid | 1 | 0.4 | 3 | 4.5 |
| Distal | 58 | 24.6 | 41 | 62.1 |
| GEJ | 176 | 74.6 | 22 | 33.3 |
| T-stage | ||||
| 1 | 5 | 2.1 | 3 | 4.5 |
| 2 | 35 | 14.8 | 5 | 7.6 |
| 3 | 192 | 81.4 | 57 | 86.4 |
| 4 | 4 | 1.7 | 1 | 1.5 |
| N-stage | ||||
| 0 | 75 | 31.8 | 16 | 24.2 |
| 1 | 140 | 59.3 | 41 | 62.1 |
| 2 | 1 | 0.4 | 7 | 10.6 |
| 3 | 20 | 8.5 | 2 | 3.0 |
| Treatment | ||||
| nCRT | 172 | 72.9 | 15 | 22.7 |
| nCRT + P | 27 | 11.4 | 2 | 3.0 |
| CRT + HT | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.5 |
| CT | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.5 |
| Surgery only | 37 | 15.7 | 47 | 71.2 |
| Mandard grade | ||||
| 1 | 26 | 11.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2 | 38 | 16.1 | 1 | 1.5 |
| 3 | 77 | 32.6 | 10 | 15.2 |
| 4 | 40 | 16.9 | 6 | 9.1 |
| 5 | 18 | 7.6 | 1 | 1.5 |
| NA | 37 | 15.7 | 48 | 72.7 |
| Recurrence | 128 | 54.2 | 66 | 100.0 |
| Alive | 75 | 31.8 | 5 | 7.6 |
Similar clinicalpathological distributions observed in both cohorts, P = panitumumab
Mandard grade NA due to no nCRT, surgery only
Fig. 2Low FOXO activity corresponds with a poor nCRT responder phenotype in EAC patient samples. A Activity of six key signal transduction pathways was measured in the resectable disease cohort (i) and compared to clinicopathological outcome data. Shown pathways from left to right: androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor (ER), Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Forkhead Box O (FOXO), Hedgehog (HH), Transforming growth factor receptor Beta (TGF-β) and Wnt pathway. Pre-treatment biopsy pathway activity scores were subtracted from matched post-nCRT resections (N = 56), yielding a delta activity score. Unique samples that passed QC were excluded from analysis. Two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank statistical tests were performed between Mandard low (1–3, N = 40) and Mandard high (4–5, N = 16) patients per pathway. B Pathway activity scores of pre-treatment EAC biopsies in the recurrent disease cohort with known Mandard score (N = 77). Both matched and unique samples were included for analysis. Wilcoxon statistical tests compare Mandard low (1–3, N = 61) and Mandard high (4–5, N = 16) patients per pathway. C Pathway activity scores of non-treated EAC resection tissue from both the resected and recurrent disease cohort (N = 37 + 47 = 84) and adjacent healthy esophageal tissue (N = 20). D Pathway signal transduction activity was measured in the recurrent disease cohort (ii). Pathway activity scores of all resected specimens (N = 150) and recurrences (N = 20) that passed QC are shown. p-values are indicated in the figures. Boxplots represent median with interquartile range
Fig. 3Targeting PI3K-FOXO pathway sensitizes EAC cells to CRT. A Western blot analysis of the PI3K-FOXO pathway in eight untreated EAC cell lines, assessed by phospho-AKT, phospho-ERK and phospho-S6K. α-tubulin was used as loading control. The membrane was sliced to exclude an ESC sample, indicated by the break. B Poor CRT responder cell line 031 M and good CRT responder cell line 289B were treated for 7 days with CRT, surviving fraction was measured on day 8. Graph shows Spearman correlation of surviving fraction after CRT versus quantified p-S6K corrected to α-tubulin as in (A). C Cells were treated for 7 days with the CRT regimen, including a concentration range of 0, 62.5, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 nM Alpelisib, Idelalisib, Pictilisib or LY3023414 [26–31]. Percentage viable cells were measured on day 8 and plotted normalized to CRT. Data represents two biological replicates with SEM. D Morphological analyses of poor responder 031 M and good responder 289B cells in untreated conditions, 7 days nCRT and 7 days nCRT + LY3023414 with 500 nM. E Poor CRT responder cell line 031 M and good responder cell line 289B were treated for 7 days with the CRT regimen in addition to 500 nM of PI3K inhibitors (based on average IC50 of four compounds). Apoptosis measured by percentage of green fluorescent Annexin V-FITC. Datapoints represent biological replicates with SD