Literature DB >> 35468001

Perceptual Disorders After Stroke: A Scoping Review of Interventions.

Christine Hazelton1, Kris McGill1, Pauline Campbell1, Alex Todhunter-Brown1, Katie Thomson1, Donald J Nicolson2, Joshua D Cheyne3, Charlie Chung4, Liam Dorris5, David C Gillespie6, Susan M Hunter7, Marian C Brady1.   

Abstract

Perceptual disorders relating to hearing, smell, somatosensation, taste, touch, and vision commonly impair stroke survivors' ability to interpret sensory information, impacting on their ability to interact with the world. We aimed to identify and summarize the existing evidence for perceptual disorder interventions poststroke and identify evidence gaps. We searched 13 electronic databases including MEDLINE and Embase and Grey literature and performed citation tracking. Two authors independently applied a priori-defined selection criteria; studies involving stroke survivors with perceptual impairments and interventions addressing those impairments were included. We extracted data on study design, population, perceptual disorders, interventions, and outcomes. Data were tabulated and synthesized narratively. Stroke survivors, carers, and clinicians were involved in agreeing definitions and organizing and interpreting data. From 91 869 records, 80 studies were identified (888 adults and 5 children); participant numbers were small (median, 3.5; range, 1-80), with a broad range of stroke types and time points. Primarily focused on vision (34/80, 42.5%) and somatosensation (28/80; 35.0%), included studies were often case reports (36/80; 45.0%) or randomized controlled trials (22/80; 27.5%). Rehabilitation approaches (78/93; 83.9%), primarily aimed to restore function, and were delivered by clinicians (30/78; 38.5%) or technology (28/78; 35.9%; including robotic interventions for somatosensory disorders). Pharmacological (6/93; 6.5%) and noninvasive brain stimulation (7/93; 7.5%) approaches were also evident. Intervention delivery was poorly reported, but most were delivered in hospital settings (56/93; 60.2%). Study outcomes failed to assess the transfer of training to daily life. Interventions for stroke-related perceptual disorders are underresearched, particularly for pediatric populations. Evidence gaps include interventions for disorders of hearing, taste, touch, and smell perception. Future studies must involve key stakeholders and report this fully. Optimization of intervention design, evaluation, and reporting is required, to support the development of effective, acceptable, and implementable interventions. Registration: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD42019160270.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory perception; perceptual disorder; review; somatosensory disorders; stroke; touch perception; visual perception

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35468001      PMCID: PMC9022686          DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   10.170


  38 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for visual field defects in patients with stroke.

Authors:  Alex Pollock; Christine Hazelton; Clair A Henderson; Jayne Angilley; Baljean Dhillon; Peter Langhorne; Katrina Livingstone; Frank A Munro; Heather Orr; Fiona J Rowe; Uma Shahani
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-10-05

2.  Do children really recover better? Neurobehavioural plasticity after early brain insult.

Authors:  Vicki Anderson; Megan Spencer-Smith; Amanda Wood
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.

Authors:  Danielle Levac; Heather Colquhoun; Kelly K O'Brien
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 4.  Altered taste and stroke: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Tara M Dutta; Anne F Josiah; Carolyn A Cronin; George F Wittenberg; John W Cole
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.119

Review 5.  Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

Authors:  Carolee J Winstein; Joel Stein; Ross Arena; Barbara Bates; Leora R Cherney; Steven C Cramer; Frank Deruyter; Janice J Eng; Beth Fisher; Richard L Harvey; Catherine E Lang; Marilyn MacKay-Lyons; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Sue Pugh; Mathew J Reeves; Lorie G Richards; William Stiers; Richard D Zorowitz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  The evolution of stroke rehabilitation randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Amanda McIntyre; Marina Richardson; Shannon Janzen; Norhayati Hussein; Robert Teasell
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 5.266

Review 7.  Visual verticality perception after stroke: A systematic review of methodological approaches and suggestions for standardization.

Authors:  C Piscicelli; D Pérennou
Journal:  Ann Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2016-04-11

8.  PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Erin Lillie; Wasifa Zarin; Kelly K O'Brien; Heather Colquhoun; Danielle Levac; David Moher; Micah D J Peters; Tanya Horsley; Laura Weeks; Susanne Hempel; Elie A Akl; Christine Chang; Jessie McGowan; Lesley Stewart; Lisa Hartling; Adrian Aldcroft; Michael G Wilson; Chantelle Garritty; Simon Lewin; Christina M Godfrey; Marilyn T Macdonald; Etienne V Langlois; Karla Soares-Weiser; Jo Moriarty; Tammy Clifford; Özge Tunçalp; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Longitudinal evaluation of cognition after stroke - A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Saa; Tamara Tse; Carolyn Baum; Toby Cumming; Naomi Josman; Miranda Rose; Leeanne Carey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.

Authors:  Peter Craig; Paul Dieppe; Sally Macintyre; Susan Michie; Irwin Nazareth; Mark Petticrew
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.