Literature DB >> 35467139

Comparison of Sheares vaginoplasty, vaginoplasty using acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa graft and laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.

Qi Zhou1,2, Xuyin Zhang1,2, Yanyun Li1,2, Keqin Hua3,4, Jingxin Ding5,6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative, anatomical and functional outcomes of patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (MRKHS), undergoing Sheares vaginoplasty, vaginoplasty using acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) graft or laparoscopic peritoneal (Davydov) vaginoplasty.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 117 patients with MRKHS undergoing creation of a neovagina from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively investigated. Comparisons between continuous variables were performed using Student's t-test and between qualitative variables using chi-squared tests.
RESULTS: The operative time, return of bowel activity and return to work were the longest in the laparoscopic Davydov group (P < 0.001). The total cost was the highest in the SIS graft group (P < 0.001). The length of the neovagina was 7.9 ± 1.2 cm in the Sheares group, 7.1 ± 0.8 cm in the SIS graft group and 8.1 ± 1.1 cm in the laparoscopic Davydov group. The difference in the length of the neovagina was significant (P < 0.001). There was significant difference in the duration of continuous mould wearing (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the total female sexual function index (FSFI) scores or in the satisfaction scores of the male partner among the three groups.
CONCLUSION: Sheares vaginoplasty and the vaginoplasty using SIS graft caused less trauma and provided similar functional results to laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty. However, the patients in the Sheares group and SIS graft group needed to wear the mould for a longer duration post-surgery. Sheares vaginoplasty can provide a valuable and economic alternative method for the creation of a neovagina in patients with MRKHS.
© 2022. The International Urogynecological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa graft; Laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty; Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (MRKHS); Sheares vaginoplasty; Vaginoplasty

Year:  2022        PMID: 35467139     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05163-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  16 in total

1.  The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function.

Authors:  R Rosen; C Brown; J Heiman; S Leiblum; C Meston; R Shabsigh; D Ferguson; R D'Agostino
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun

2.  Comparison of two laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty techniques in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.

Authors:  Xiwa Zhao; Ruixue Wang; Yanxiu Wang; Li Li; Haibo Zhang; Shan Kang
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Comparison of neovaginoplasty using acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa graft or Interceed in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.

Authors:  Xuyin Zhang; Junjun Qiu; Jingxin Ding; Keqin Hua
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  New Laparoscopic Vaginoplasty Procedure With a Modified Peritoneal Pull-Down Technique in Four Patients With Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome.

Authors:  Iori Kisu; Masaaki Ito; Kanako Nakamura; Tetsuro Shiraishi; Tomoko Iijima; Hiroshi Senba; Kiyoko Matsuda; Nobumaru Hirao
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 1.814

5.  Sexual and functional outcomes of vaginoplasty using acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa graft or laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jing-Xin Ding; Li-mei Chen; Xu-yin Zhang; Ying Zhang; Ke-Qin Hua
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Creation of a neovagina according to Wharton-Sheares-George in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.

Authors:  Theresa Schätz; Johannes Huber; René Wenzl
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Comparison of small intestinal submucosa graft with split-thickness skin graft for cervicovaginal reconstruction of congenital vaginal and cervical aplasia.

Authors:  Fang Shen; Xu-Yin Zhang; Chu-Yang Yin; Jing-Xin Ding; Ke-Qin Hua
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Sexuality after laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome.

Authors:  Xishi Liu; Maohua Liu; Keqin Hua; Bin Li; Sun-Wei Guo
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.137

9.  The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Grigoris F Grimbizis; Stephan Gordts; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Sara Brucker; Carlo De Angelis; Marco Gergolet; Tin-Chiu Li; Vasilios Tanos; Hans Brölmann; Luca Gianaroli; Rudi Campo
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 10.  Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: a comprehensive update.

Authors:  Morten Krogh Herlin; Michael Bjørn Petersen; Mats Brännström
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 4.123

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.