| Literature DB >> 35465489 |
Xiuyuan Tang1,2, Yanping Gong1, Chunyan Chen1, Suying Wang1, Pengfei Chen1.
Abstract
This study tested a conceptual model in which photo-sharing behavior during travel elicits tourists' emotional state, and in turn improves evaluation of the tourism product. The research results in the context of tourist attractions and restaurants provide support for the proposed model. Specifically, tourists' photo-sharing behavior was significantly associated with more positive product evaluation, both directly and indirectly via the emotion of pleasure. These associations were stronger when the interdependent self-construers had good social experience. The results provide practical guidance for marketers to developing marketing strategy.Entities:
Keywords: photo-sharing behavior; pleasure; self-construal type; social experience; tourism product evaluation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35465489 PMCID: PMC9024168 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.838176
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Overview of the hypothesized moderated mediation model.
Means, standard deviations, and correlations among study variables in Study 1.
| Variables |
|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 1. Sex | 1.54 | 0.50 | |||||
| 2. Age | 23.47 | 4.32 | −0.08 | ||||
| 3. Education level | 4.25 | 0.56 | −0.01 | −0.09 | |||
| 4. Tourists’ photo-sharing behavior | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | ||
| 5. Pleasure | 5.76 | 0.94 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.36*** | |
| 6. Tourism product evaluation | 6.11 | 0.72 | 0.07 | −0.01 | 0.10 | 0.34*** | 0.45*** |
n = 303. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Regression results for mediation effect between tourists’ photo-sharing behavior and tourism product evaluation in Study 1.
| Variables | Equation 1 | Equation 2 | Equation 3 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Control variables | ||||||
| Sex | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.08 |
| Education level | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.07 |
| Independent variable | ||||||
| Tourists’ photo-sharing behavior | 0.68*** | 0.10 | 0.30*** | 0.08 | 0.49*** | 0.08 |
| Mediator | ||||||
| Pleasure | 0.12*** | 0.04 | ||||
|
| 0.13*** | 0.25*** | 0.13*** | |||
n = 303. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Means, standard deviations, and correlations among study variables in Study 2.
| Variables |
|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1. Sex | 1.56 | 0.50 | |||||||
| 2. Age | 24.083 | 4.82 | −0.00 | ||||||
| 3. Education level | 4.22 | 0.70 | 0.07 | 0.06 | |||||
| 4. Tourists’ photo-sharing behavior | 0.50 | 0.50 | −0.04 | −0.04 | 0.08 | ||||
| 5. Pleasure | 5.62 | 0.90 | −0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.19** | |||
| 6. Social experience | 5.29 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.13* | 0.34*** | ||
| 7. Self-construal type | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.12* | −0.05 | 0.02 | 0.11 | −0.01 | 0.06 | |
| 8. Tourism product evaluation | 5.56 | 1.23 | 0.03 | −0.03 | 0.00 | 0.32*** | 0.30*** | 0.19** | 0.13* |
n = 320. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Regression results for mediation effect between tourists’ photo-sharing behavior and tourism product evaluation in Study 2.
| Variables | Equation 4 | Equation 5 | Equation 6 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Control variables | ||||||
| Sex | −0.04 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Education level | 0.01 | 0.07 | −0.05 | 0.09 | −0.05 | 0.09 |
| Independent variable | ||||||
| Tourists’ photo-sharing behavior | 0.33*** | 0.10 | 0.67*** | 0.13 | 0.79*** | 0.13 |
| Mediator | ||||||
| Pleasure | 0.35*** | 0.07 | ||||
|
| 0.04** | 0.16*** | 0.10*** | |||
n = 320. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Regression analyses of tourists’ photo-sharing behavior predicting tourism product evaluation in Study 2.
| Variables | Equation 7 | Equation 8 | ||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Control variables | ||||
| Sex | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.13 |
| Education level | −0.02 | 0.09 | −0.02 | 0.09 |
| Independent variable | ||||
| Tourists’ photo-sharing behavior | ||||
| Mediator | . | |||
| Pleasure | 0.41*** | 0.08 | 0.37*** | 0.08 |
| Moderators | ||||
| Social experience | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.06 |
| Self-construal type | 0.17 | 0.14 | ||
| Interaction terms | ||||
| Pleasure × Social experience | 0.14* | 0.05 | 0.17** | 0.06 |
| Pleasure × Self-construal type | 0.51** | 0.16 | ||
| Social experience × Self-construal type | 0.10 | 0.11 | ||
| Pleasure × Social experience × Self-construal type | 0.33** 0.11 | |||
|
| 0.12*** | 0.19*** | ||
n = 320. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 2Moderating effect of social experience on the relationship between pleasure and tourism product evaluation in study 2.
FIGURE 3Three-way interaction of pleasure, social experience and self-construal type.
Simple slope and slope difference tests for three-way interaction in Study 2.
| Simple slope tests | ||
| Slopes | Gradient of simple slope | |
| 1 (Good social experience, Interdependent self-construers) | 0.91 | 3.16** |
| 2 (Good social experience, Independent self-construers) | 0.06 | 0.17 |
| 3 (Poor social experience, Interdependent self-construers) | 0.31 | 1.23* |
| 4 (Poor social experience, Independent self-construers) | 0.10 | 0.32 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 1 and 2 | 0.86 | 1.37* |
| 1 and 3 | 0.60 | 1.19* |
| 1 and 4 | 0.81 | 4.57*** |
| 2 and 3 | −0.25 | −1.07* |
| 2 and 4 | −0.04 | −0.06 |
| 3 and 4 | 0.21 | 0.40 |
n = 320. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.