| Literature DB >> 35464975 |
Ting Wang1,2,3,4, Xi Chen5, Jialin Li1,6, Song Qin1,6.
Abstract
Marine Synechococcus, a significant contributor to primary production, shows high phylogenetic diversity. However, studies on its phylogenetic composition in the Bohai Sea, the largest continental sea in China, are lacking. We sequenced rpoC1 (encodes the RNA polymerase β' subunit protein) in samples from the Laizhou Bay (LZB) and Bohai Strait (BS) in June and November using high-throughput sequencing to reveal the phylogenetic composition of Synechococcus assemblages in the bay and strait areas of the Bohai Sea. In total, 12 lineages representing Synechococcus subclusters S5.1, S5.2, and S5.3 were identified. Spatially, clade I was obligately dominant in BS. In contrast, the Synechococcus assemblage in LZB was more diverse, with clades VI and III being highly abundant. In addition, we detected strong variation in Synechococcus structure between June and November in the Bohai Sea. Clades II, III, XX, and miyav were only detected in November. Vertically, variation in Synechococcus assemblage was not apparent among the water layers probably due to the shallow water depth with intense water mixing. Results of redundancy analysis (RDA) and random forest (RF) analysis together highlighted the key role of silicate in the Synechococcus assemblage. Our results suggested that the Bohai Sea provides various niches for different Synechococcus clades, resulting in a special phylogenetic composition of the Synechococcus assemblage, compared with that in the adjacent shelf sea and other continental seas in the world.Entities:
Keywords: cyanobacteria; genetic diversity; high-throughput sequencing; marginal sea; phylogeny; picoplankton; silicon accumulation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35464975 PMCID: PMC9020259 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.757896
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Information of sampling station, latitude, longitude, date, and depth of all samples.
| Sample name | Sampling station | Latitude (°N) | Longitude (°E) | Sampling date | Sampling depth (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BS-0-S | BS | 38.5 | 121.24 | June 10, 2019 | 0 |
| BS-10-S | 10 | ||||
| BS-30-S | 30 | ||||
| BS-B-S | 53 | ||||
| LZB-0-S | LZB | 37.75 | 119.92 | June 16, 2019 | 0 |
| LZB-10-S | 10 | ||||
| LZB-B-S | 15 | ||||
| BS-0-W | BS | 38.51 | 121.24 | November 6, 2019 | 0 |
| BS-10-W | 10 | ||||
| BS-30-W | 30 | ||||
| BS-B-W | 53 | ||||
| LZB-0-W | LZB | 37.8 | 119.93 | November 8, 2019 | 0 |
| LZB-10-W | 10 | ||||
| LZB-B-W | 15 |
BS, Bohai Strait; LZB, Laizhou Bay; B, bottom water layer; S, summer (sampled in June); and W, winter (sampled in November).
Figure 1Environmental variables in the studied stations of Bohai Sea.
High-throughput sequencing information and alpha diversity parameters.
| Sample | Sequence numbers | Sequence mean length | Shannon diversity index | Chao1 estimator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BS-0-S | 23,496 | 395 | 2.15 | 52 |
| BS-10-S | 43,658 | 400 | 1.39 | 18 |
| BS-30-S | 56,798 | 403 | 1.22 | 17 |
| BS-B-S | 14,515 | 392 | 1.55 | 39 |
| LZB-0-S | 10,502 | 365 | 1.75 | 43 |
| LZB-10-S | 14,202 | 368 | 1.73 | 42 |
| LZB-B-S | 5,828 | 361 | 2.07 | 33 |
| BS-0-W | 57,023 | 402 | 0.60 | 30 |
| BS-10-W | 36,962 | 387 | 2.28 | 68 |
| BS-30-W | 35,270 | 401 | 2.06 | 51 |
| BS-B-W | 36,232 | 399 | 2.25 | 53 |
| LZB-0-W | 24,061 | 395 | 2.00 | 47 |
| LZB-10-W | 21,324 | 379 | 1.96 | 33 |
| LZB-B-W | 51,258 | 397 | 2.27 | 51 |
Figure 2The principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) with permutational multivariate ANOVA (PERMANOVA) test showing the variation in Synechococcus assemblages at operational taxonomic units (OTU) level among samples at different stations and in different months. BS-S, samples at station Bohai Strait (BS) in summer (June); BS-W, samples at station BS in winter (November); LZB-S, samples at station Laizhou Bay (LZB) in summer (June); LZB-W, samples at station LZB in winter (November).
Figure 3Genomic composition of Synechococcus assemblages. (A) The maximum-likelihood (ML) tree constructed using rpoC1 sequences with relative abundances of more than 0.1%. (B) The relative abundance of Synechococcus clades.
Figure 4Co-occurrence patterns of Synechococcus genotypes. (A) The co-occurrence network of Synechococcus clades. The size of node represents its average percentage in all samples; the lightness of node represents its degree; the thickness of the edge represents its weight; the red edges represent positive correlations, and the green edges represent negative correlations. (B) Hubba scores ranked by the Closeness method represent the significance of each node.
Figure 5Redundancy analysis (RDA) with the permutation test between Synechococcus clades and environmental variables.
Figure 6Random forest (RF) analysis between each Synechococcus clade and environmental variables. Sal, salinity; Tem, temperature; Con, conductivity; Dep, depth; Tur, turbidity; and Oxy, oxygen saturation. Abscissas are %ImcMSE evaluating the materiality of environmental variables to each Synechococcus clade in RF.
Results of linear ordinary least square (OLS) regression for the relative abundances of Synechococcus genotypes and environmental variables.
| I | II | III | IV | VI | VIII | IX | XVI | XX | miyav | S5.2 | S5.3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO2− | 0.35* | 0.57** | 0.47** | 0.68** | 0.66** | 0.49** | ||||||
| NO3− | 0.39* | 0.48** | 0.35* | 0.33* | 0.30* | |||||||
| NH4+ | 0.34* | 0.32* | ||||||||||
| PO43− | 0.41* | 0.40* | ||||||||||
| SiO44− | 0.70** | 0.50** | 0.69** | 0.44** | ||||||||
| Chl. | 0.70** | |||||||||||
| Conductivity | ||||||||||||
| Salinity | 0.51** | 0.55** | 0.40* | 0.63** | 0.47** | 0.43* | ||||||
| Temperature | 0.64** | 0.36* | ||||||||||
| Turbidity | 0.41* | 0.50** | 0.64** | 0.29* | ||||||||
| pH | 0.43* | |||||||||||
| Oxygen saturation | 0.34* |
OLS, linear ordinary least squares.
“*” represents p < 0.05.
“**” represents p < 0.01.