| Literature DB >> 35464926 |
Ming-Qing Huang1, Ming Zhang1, Shu-Lin Zhan1, Lin Chen1, Zhen-Lin Xue2.
Abstract
In situ fragmentation bioleaching is a promising way to perform deep mining safely, economically, and in an environmentally friendly manner, where oxygen plays a critical role in microbial growth and mineral dissolution. However, the lack of oxygen limits the implementation of in-situ fragmentation bioleaching. To overcome this limitation, aeration was proposed, with saturated dissolved oxygen concentration as an important indicator. Orthogonal experiments were conducted to measure saturated dissolved oxygen concentration at various temperature, pH, and electrolyte (ferrous sulfate, ferric sulfate, copper sulfate, and sulfuric acid) concentration conditions. Experimental data were analyzed by Python programming language and least squares method to obtain a saturated dissolved oxygen concentration model. Results showed that temperature had the most significant effect on oxygen solubility, which was concluded by comparing the results of surface fitting based on the least squares method. At 30-40°C, the saturated dissolved oxygen concentration decreased faster as metal ions concentration increased. The conjoint effect of the five variables on oxygen solubility showed that pH was linearly negatively related to oxygen solubility. Additionally, a mathematical model was also proposed to predict the saturated dissolved oxygen concentration in in situ fragmentation bioleaching of copper sulfide ores. This work enables bioleaching processes to be modeled and controlled more effectively.Entities:
Keywords: aeration; copper sulfide ore; in situ fragmentation bioleaching; oxygen solubility; surface fitting
Year: 2022 PMID: 35464926 PMCID: PMC9019730 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.821635
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Experimental setup for measuring saturated dissolved oxygen concentration in bioleaching solutions (1—dissolved oxygen meter; 2—dissolved oxygen electrode; 3—silicone hose; 4—oxygen pump; 5—dissolved oxygen measuring flask; 6—thermostat water bath).
Headers of the five-factor and five-level orthogonal design.
| No. | Temperature (°C) | pH | [Fe2+] (g/L) | [Cu2+] (g/L) | [Fe3+] (g/L) |
| 1 | 30 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 35 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 3 | 40 | 2.5 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| 4 | 45 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| 5 | 50 | 3.5 | 8 | 10 | 8 |
Saturated dissolved oxygen concentration measurements.
| No. | Temperature (°C) | pH | [Fe2+] (g/L) | [Cu2+] (g/L) | [Fe3+] (g/L) | Oxygen concentration (mg/L) |
| 1 | 30 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.14 |
| 2 | 30 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7.2 |
| 3 | 30 | 2.25 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 7.05 |
| 4 | 30 | 2.27 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6.82 |
| 5 | 30 | 2.41 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 6.51 |
| 6 | 35 | 1.5 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 6.73 |
| 7 | 35 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 6.69 |
| 8 | 35 | 2.5 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 6.46 |
| 9 | 35 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 6.75 |
| 10 | 35 | 2.61 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6.70 |
| 11 | 40 | 1.5 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 6.55 |
| 12 | 40 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 6.30 |
| 13 | 40 | 2.5 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6.21 |
| 14 | 40 | 2.28 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 6.18 |
| 15 | 40 | 3.23 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 5.97 |
| 16 | 45 | 1.5 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 5.95 |
| 17 | 45 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 5.90 |
| 18 | 45 | 2.5 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 5.50 |
| 19 | 45 | 2.44 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 5.72 |
| 20 | 45 | 2.26 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 5.60 |
| 21 | 50 | 1.5 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 5.62 |
| 22 | 50 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5.29 |
| 23 | 50 | 2.17 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 5.57 |
| 24 | 50 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5.30 |
| 25 | 50 | 2.82 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5.52 |
FIGURE 2(A) Relative error and (B) residual value of the dissolved oxygen concentration model.
Fitting parameters of this model.
| Fitting parameters | Sum squared residual | Average relative error | F | P | R2 |
| Value | 0.034 | 0.0226 | 42.83 | < 0.0001 | 0.966 |
FIGURE 3Comparison of experimental (in red) and fitted (in blue) values of dissolved oxygen concentration in copper bioleaching solutions.
FIGURE 4Correlation coefficient of factors to dissolved oxygen concentration.
FIGURE 5Multi-correlation coefficients of various combinations of process parameters.
FIGURE 6Multi-correlation coefficients of factor combinations without temperature.
FIGURE 7Conjoint effect of temperature and pH on dissolved oxygen concentration.
FIGURE 9Conjoint effect of (A) temperature and (B) iron ions concentration on dissolved oxygen concentration.
FIGURE 8Conjoint effect of temperature and Cu2+ concentration on dissolved oxygen concentration.
Results of verification tests (CI is the measurement value and CEq. 1 is the value predicted by Eq. 1).
| Day | Temperature (°C) | pH | Cu2+ (g/L) | Fe2+ (g/L) | Fe3+ (g/L) | ||
| 4 | 30 | 2.18 | 0.162 | 3.284 | 0.365 | 7.18 | 7.2 |
| 8 | 30 | 2.05 | 0.339 | 5.755 | 0.639 | 7.21 | 7.17 |
| 12 | 35 | 1.97 | 0.541 | 6.871 | 1.718 | 6.81 | 6.73 |
| 16 | 35 | 1.92 | 0.853 | 7.895 | 3.383 | 6.67 | 6.7 |
| 20 | 40 | 1.89 | 0.934 | 8.401 | 4.524 | 6.24 | 6.27 |
| 24 | 40 | 1.74 | 1.149 | 8.6286 | 5.752 | 6.29 | 6.25 |
| 28 | 45 | 1.69 | 1.258 | 7.549 | 7.549 | 5.78 | 5.82 |
| 32 | 45 | 1.62 | 1.322 | 6.824 | 9.424 | 5.72 | 5.81 |
| 36 | 50 | 1.61 | 1.335 | 5.412 | 12.047 | 5.47 | 5.38 |