Nishant Munugala1, Shishir K Maithel2, Rachna T Shroff3. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. 2. Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of GI Medical Oncology, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Cholangiocarcinoma is a highly aggressive and heterogenous group of biliary malignancies arising from any site in the biliary tree, comprising 15% of all primary liver cancers. The nature of the disease and nonspecific presentation leads to late diagnosis and ultimately poor outcomes for patients. Combination gemcitabine and cisplatin has been the standard of care for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) since 2010, with a median overall survival of 11.7 months. The five-year survival for CCA remains 5-10%, revealing a clear need for improved treatment options. Methods: This targeted review highlights the role of next generation sequencing in CCA and the clinically relevant tumor biomarkers that have become the focus of therapeutic development. Key Content and Findings: These tumor biomarkers or actionable mutations hold the potential to enable earlier diagnosis, provide prognostic information, and guide treatment decisions for patients with CCA. Specifically, the FGFR2 fusion and IDH1 mutation have shown considerable promise in development of targeted therapies. Clinical trials with inhibitors targeting FGFR2 fusion and IDH1 mutation have created expectations that these drugs will soon enter clinical practice. Other biomarkers including KRAS and B-raf protooncogenes, Her2/neu genes, and BRCA1 and 2 tumor-suppressor genes have also been touted as potential targets for future therapies, with early data showing promise for new drug development. Conclusion: The discovery of these actionable mutations and identification of targeted therapies have challenged the notion of a "one-size fits all" for treatment of CCA, and generated optimism that these novel treatments will soon be available for patients with CCA. 2022 Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. All rights reserved.
Background and Objectives: Cholangiocarcinoma is a highly aggressive and heterogenous group of biliary malignancies arising from any site in the biliary tree, comprising 15% of all primary liver cancers. The nature of the disease and nonspecific presentation leads to late diagnosis and ultimately poor outcomes for patients. Combination gemcitabine and cisplatin has been the standard of care for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) since 2010, with a median overall survival of 11.7 months. The five-year survival for CCA remains 5-10%, revealing a clear need for improved treatment options. Methods: This targeted review highlights the role of next generation sequencing in CCA and the clinically relevant tumor biomarkers that have become the focus of therapeutic development. Key Content and Findings: These tumor biomarkers or actionable mutations hold the potential to enable earlier diagnosis, provide prognostic information, and guide treatment decisions for patients with CCA. Specifically, the FGFR2 fusion and IDH1 mutation have shown considerable promise in development of targeted therapies. Clinical trials with inhibitors targeting FGFR2 fusion and IDH1 mutation have created expectations that these drugs will soon enter clinical practice. Other biomarkers including KRAS and B-raf protooncogenes, Her2/neu genes, and BRCA1 and 2 tumor-suppressor genes have also been touted as potential targets for future therapies, with early data showing promise for new drug development. Conclusion: The discovery of these actionable mutations and identification of targeted therapies have challenged the notion of a "one-size fits all" for treatment of CCA, and generated optimism that these novel treatments will soon be available for patients with CCA. 2022 Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. All rights reserved.
Authors: Paul T C Wan; Mathew J Garnett; S Mark Roe; Sharlene Lee; Dan Niculescu-Duvaz; Valerie M Good; C Michael Jones; Christopher J Marshall; Caroline J Springer; David Barford; Richard Marais Journal: Cell Date: 2004-03-19 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Rocio I R Macias; Miroslaw Kornek; Pedro M Rodrigues; Nuno A Paiva; Rui E Castro; Sabine Urban; Stephen P Pereira; Massimiliano Cadamuro; Christian Rupp; Sven H Loosen; Tom Luedde; Jesus M Banales Journal: Liver Int Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Talia Golan; Maria Raitses-Gurevich; Robin K Kelley; Andrea G Bocobo; Ayelet Borgida; Rachna T Shroff; Spring Holter; Steven Gallinger; Daniel H Ahn; Dan Aderka; Jain Apurva; Tanois Bekaii-Saab; Eitan Friedman; Milind Javle Journal: Oncologist Date: 2017-05-09
Authors: Apurva Jain; Mitesh J Borad; Robin Kate Kelley; Ying Wang; Reham Abdel-Wahab; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Keith A Baggerly; Ahmed Omar Kaseb; Humaid O Al-Shamsi; Daniel H Ahn; Thomas DeLeon; Andrea Grace Bocobo; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Rachna T Shroff; Milind Javle Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2018-11
Authors: Andrew X Zhu; Darrell R Borger; Yuhree Kim; David Cosgrove; Aslam Ejaz; Sorin Alexandrescu; Ryan Thomas Groeschl; Vikram Deshpande; James M Lindberg; Cristina Ferrone; Christine Sempoux; Thomas Yau; Ronnie Poon; Irinel Popescu; Todd W Bauer; T Clark Gamblin; Jean Francois Gigot; Robert A Anders; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal Journal: Nature Date: 2002-06-09 Impact factor: 49.962