| Literature DB >> 35463683 |
Abstract
The paper analyzes the detection of insomnia and carotid artery stenosis by magnetic sensitivity weighted imaging (SWI) based on radio communication and its relationship with cognitive dysfunction. A total of 148 patients with carotid artery stenosis and insomnia admitted to our hospital from January 2020 to June 2021 are selected. According to different detection methods, wireless communication combined with SWI group and conventional group are established respectively, with 74 cases in each group. The conventional group applies CT angiography (CTA) is in line with the intervention mode of patients complaining of sleep at night. In the wireless communication combined with SWI group, the sleep monitoring system of wireless communication combined with SWI detection method is used to observe the imaging detection rate, insomnia detection rate and diagnostic efficiency of the two groups. The differences of PSG index parameters, sleep quality (PSQI) score and cognitive function (MoCA) score of patients with different disease degrees are compared. Pearson correlation coefficient is used to analyze the correlation between PSQI score and MoCA score. SWI sequence scan based on wireless network communication has high efficiency in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis, and the sleep status of patients can be better understood by real-time monitoring of patients, which is of great significance for the follow-up development of effective diagnosis and treatment plans and recovery of patients' cognitive function, and worthy of clinical application.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35463683 PMCID: PMC9023171 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6056502
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 3.822
Comparison of imaging examination results (n,%).
| Group | On the left side of the narrow | On the right side of the narrow | Bilateral stenosis | Combined |
|
| ||||
| Regular group | 18 (24.32) | 16 (21.62) | 35 (47.30) | 62 (93.24) |
| Wireless communications joint SWI group | 19 (25.67) | 15 (20.27) | 39 (52.70) | 70 (98.65) |
|
| — | — | — | 2.779 |
|
| — | — | — | 0.095 |
Figure 1ROC curves of the two imaging detection methods.
Figure 2ROC curves of the two insomnia detection methods.
Diagnostic value of CTA and SWI in carotid artery stenosis.
| Testing way | AUC (95%CI) | Sensitivity (%) | Specific degrees (%) | About an index | Cutoff value |
|
| |||||
| CTA | 0.846 (0.787∼0.882) | 80.500 | 78.500 | 0.590 | 0.82 |
| SWI | 0.892 (0.834∼0.933) | 85.000 | 91.000 | 0.760 | 0.86 |
Diagnostic value analysis of radio communication and patient complaints for insomnia symptoms.
| Testing way | AUC (95%CI) | Sensitivity (%) | Specific degrees (%) | About an index | Cutoff value |
|
| |||||
| Patients complained | 0.769 (0.662∼0.835) | 71.500 | 80.000 | 0.515 | 0.84 |
| Wireless network communication | 0.821 (0.778∼0.856) | 84.000 | 79.500 | 0.635 | 0.76 |
Comparison of PSG index parameters in patients with different degrees of disease (‾x ± s).
| Group | Sleep latency (min) | The amount of sleep (h) | Bed time (h) | Sleep efficiency |
|
| ||||
| Mild group ( | 22.12 ± 7.28 | 7.34 ± 0.86 | 8.27 ± 0.49 | 0.87 ± 0.07 |
| The moderate group ( | 22.45 ± 7.31 | 6.48 ± 0.63 | 7.83 ± 0.42 | 0.76 ± 0.15 |
| Severe group ( | 22.96 ± 7.46 | 5.95 ± 0.54 | 7.25 ± 0.37 | 0.69 ± 0.18 |
|
| −0.505 | 6.093 | 5.055 | 4.222 |
|
| 0.615 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.028 |
Comparison of PSQI scores of patients with different degrees of disease (score, ‾x ± s).
| Group | The quality of sleep | Sleep time | The amount of sleep | Sleep efficiency | Sleep disorders | Sleeping pills | Daytime function | Total score |
|
| ||||||||
| Mild group ( | 1.26 ± 0.41 | 1.05 ± 0.37 | 1.36 ± 0.28 | 1.15 ± 0.19 | 1.26 ± 0.27 | 1.19 ± 0.36 | 0.94 ± 0.11 | 8.21 ± 2.17 |
| The moderate group ( | 1.87 ± 0.45 | 1.63 ± 0.46 | 1.78 ± 0.35 | 1.53 ± 0.31 | 1.57 ± 0.45 | 1.65 ± 0.41 | 1.47 ± 0.34 | 11.50 ± 2.76 |
| Severe group ( | 2.32 ± 0.47 | 2.08 ± 0.54 | 2.09 ± 0.47 | 1.81 ± 0.42 | 1.86 ± 0.49 | 2.07 ± 0.44 | 1.79 ± 0.48 | 14.02 ± 2.94 |
|
| 5.215 | 5.977 | 6.650 | 6.229 | 4.553 | 6.045 | 5.890 | 6.638 |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Comparison of MoCA score in patients with different disease degrees (score, ‾x ± s).
| Group | Visual spatial execution | Abstract ability | Directional force | Language ability | Memory | Named | Attention | Total score |
|
| ||||||||
| Mild group ( | 4.32 ± 0.94 | 1.45 ± 0.47 | 5.24 ± 0.96 | 2.36 ± 0.62 | 3.85 ± 1.03 | 2.61 ± 0.57 | 5.25 ± 1.02 | 23.08 ± 4.11 |
| The moderate group ( | 3.42 ± 0.67 | 0.92 ± 0.39 | 4.38 ± 0.77 | 1.87 ± 0.54 | 2.82 ± 0.86 | 2.28 ± 0.43 | 4.49 ± 0.77 | 20.18 ± 5.64 |
| Severe group ( | 2.61 ± 0.83 | 0.63 ± 0.28 | 3.22 ± 0.58 | 1.24 ± 0.59 | 2.07 ± 0.64 | 1.78 ± 0.36 | 3.75 ± 0.68 | 15.30 ± 5.29 |
|
| 5.907 | 6.549 | 5.222 | 4.590 | 5.709 | 3.479 | 4.476 | 4.330 |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 3Correlation between PSQI score and MoCA score in patients with carotid artery stenosis and insomnia.