| Literature DB >> 35462608 |
Yanfeng Zhang1, Qingkao Zeng2, Yuquan Fang2, Wei Wang2, Yunjin Chen2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently no reliable tools are available for predicting the risk of central nervous system (CNS) infections in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage after undergoing ventriculostomy drainage. The current study sought to develop and validate a nomogram to identify high-risk factors of CNS infection after ventriculomegaly drain placement for intracerebral hemorrhage.Entities:
Keywords: CNS infection; Intracerebral hemorrhage; Nomogram; Ventriculostomy tube drainage
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35462608 PMCID: PMC9135812 DOI: 10.1007/s43441-022-00403-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ther Innov Regul Sci ISSN: 2168-4790 Impact factor: 1.337
Basic clinical characteristics of the two groups
| Demographic characteristics | CNSIs (NO, | CNSIs (YES, | Total ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, | ||||||
| Male | 97 | 58.79% | 14 | 70.00% | 111 | 60.00% |
| Female | 68 | 41.21% | 6 | 30.00% | 74 | 40.00% |
| Age | 60.95 ± 12.37 | 59.35 ± 9.89 | 60.77 ± 12.11 | |||
| Operation time, | 1.78 ± 1.27 | 2.18 ± 1.33 | 1.82 ± 1.27 | |||
| Intraventricular drainage duration | 13.16 ± 9.71 | 22.50 ± 14.18 | 14.17 ± 10.64 | |||
| Intraventricular irrigation, | ||||||
| Yes | 89 | 53.94% | 15 | 75.00% | 104 | 56.22% |
| No | 76 | 46.06% | 5 | 25.00% | 81 | 43.78% |
| Postoperative temperature | 38.13 ± 0.76 | 38.77 ± 0.50 | 38.20 ± 0.76 | |||
| White blood cell count in CSF, | 1551.23 ± 3912.15 | 18,009.30 ± 24,567.19 | 3330.48 ± 10,110.56 | |||
| Red blood cell count in CSF, | 145,736.48 ± 404,144.48 | 216,045.00 ± 314,093.96 | 153,337.40 ± 395,279.18 | |||
| Neutrophil ratio in CSF, | 69.49 ± 24.11 | 87.05 ± 8.42 | 71.39 ± 23.57 | |||
| CSF glucose content, | 3.53 ± 1.61 | 1.26 ± 1.12 | 3.29 ± 1.72 | |||
| CSF protein content, | 4.35 ± 5.36 | 4.59 ± 3.58 | 4.37 ± 5.19 | |||
| CSF chloride content, | 121.46 ± 6.82 | 119.26 ± 9.24 | 121.22 ± 7.13 | |||
Fig. 1Lasso regression analysis. A Lasso regression curves, where each curve corresponds to one variable. None of the regression parameters was zero. B Fivefold cross validation plot with log on the horizontal axis (λ) values, the uppermost number indicates the number of included variables. The dotted left line corresponds to the lowest point of the red curve. The dotted line on the right corresponds to the simplest model
Fig. 2The uppermost scale is the score corresponding to each variable, the scores of each variable are summed, and the resulting total score corresponds to the lowest axis of probability values to obtain the probability of secondary CNS infections
Odds ratio values for 6 variables
| Intercept and variable | Prediction model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| B | Odds ratio (95% CI)* | ||
| Intercept | − 33.26 | 3.60E – 15 (3.03E − 38–8.760027E10) | 0.19 |
| Operation time | 0.37 | 1.44 (0.74–2.93) | 0.28 |
| Intraventricular drainage duration | 0.12 | 1.13 (1.05–1.24) | 0.0032 |
| Postoperative temperature | 0.66 | 1.93 (0.58–7.37) | 0.30 |
| White blood cell count in CSF | 1.09E − 4 | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | 0.07 |
| Neutrophil ratio in CSF | 0.06 | 1.06 (1.00–1.18) | 0.12 |
| Red blood cell count in CSF | 2.11E − 6 | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | 0.43 |
| CSF glucose content | − 1.04 | 0.35 (0.14–0.70) | 0.01 |
*Compared via the odds ratio
Fig. 3Calibration curve for prediction of CNS infection after ICH
Fig. 4ROC curve and DCA. A ROC curve to evaluate discrimination of the nomogram model. B DCA to evaluate if the nomogram improves clinical decision-making. C Clinical impact curves of the nomogram for distinguishing CNS infections