Literature DB >> 35461431

Consistent individual variation in plant communication: do plants have personalities?

Richard Karban1, Patrick Grof-Tisza2, Charline Couchoux3.   

Abstract

Animal biologists have recently focused on individual variation in behavioral traits and have found that individuals of many species have personalities. These are defined as consistent intraspecific differences in behaviors that are repeatable across different situations and stable over time. When animals sense danger, some individuals will alert neighbors with alarm calls and both calling and responding vary consistently among individuals. Plants, including sagebrush, emit volatile cues when they are attacked by herbivores and neighbors perceive these cues and reduce their own damage. We experimentally transferred volatiles between pairs of sagebrush plants to evaluate whether individuals showed consistent variation in their effectiveness as emitters and as receivers of cues, measured in terms of reduced herbivore damage. We found that 64% of the variance in chewing damage to branches over the growing season was attributable to the identity of the individual receiving the cues. This variation could have been caused by inherent differences in the plants as well as by differences in the environments where they grew and their histories. We found that 5% of the variance in chewing damage was attributable to the identity of the emitter that provided the cue. This fraction of variation was statistically significant and could not be attributed to the environmental conditions of the receiver. Effective receivers were also relatively effective emitters, indicating consistency across different situations. Pairs of receivers and emitters that were effective communicators in 2018 were again relatively effective in 2019, indicating consistency over time. These results suggest that plants have repeatable individual personalities with respect to alarm calls.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alarm call; Behavior; Personality; Plant communication; Repeatability; Volatiles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35461431     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-022-05173-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  37 in total

1.  Caterpillar-induced nocturnal plant volatiles repel conspecific females.

Authors:  C M De Moraes; M C Mescher; J H Tumlinson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-29       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Richard Svanbäck; James A Fordyce; Louie H Yang; Jeremy M Davis; C Darrin Hulsey; Matthew L Forister
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 3.  A modular concept of phenotypic plasticity in plants.

Authors:  Hans de Kroon; Heidrun Huber; Josef F Stuefer; Jan M van Groenendael
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis) calling behavior in response to threats and in flight: Flockmate familiarity matters.

Authors:  Brittany A Coppinger; Anasthasia Sanchez de Launay; Todd M Freeberg
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  The contribution of additive genetic variation to personality variation: heritability of personality.

Authors:  Ned A Dochtermann; Tori Schwab; Andrew Sih
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Plants are intelligent; now what?

Authors:  Daniel A Chamovitz
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 15.793

7.  Personality and the response to predation risk: effects of information quantity and quality.

Authors:  Grant E Brown; Chris K Elvidge; Indar Ramnarine; Douglas P Chivers; Maud C O Ferrari
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Reliability and the adaptive utility of discrimination among alarm callers.

Authors:  Daniel T Blumstein; Laure Verneyre; Janice C Daniel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alison M Bell; Shala J Hankison; Kate L Laskowski
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Plant neurobiology: no brain, no gain?

Authors:  Amedeo Alpi; Nikolaus Amrhein; Adam Bertl; Michael R Blatt; Eduardo Blumwald; Felice Cervone; Jack Dainty; Maria Ida De Michelis; Emanuel Epstein; Arthur W Galston; Mary Helen M Goldsmith; Chris Hawes; Rüdiger Hell; Alistair Hetherington; Herman Hofte; Gerd Juergens; Chris J Leaver; Anna Moroni; Angus Murphy; Karl Oparka; Pierdomenico Perata; Hartmut Quader; Thomas Rausch; Christophe Ritzenthaler; Alberto Rivetta; David G Robinson; Dale Sanders; Ben Scheres; Karin Schumacher; Hervé Sentenac; Clifford L Slayman; Carlo Soave; Chris Somerville; Lincoln Taiz; Gerhard Thiel; Richard Wagner
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 18.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.