Literature DB >> 24563039

Personality and the response to predation risk: effects of information quantity and quality.

Grant E Brown1, Chris K Elvidge, Indar Ramnarine, Douglas P Chivers, Maud C O Ferrari.   

Abstract

Within aquatic ecosystems, chemosensory cues provide valuable public information regarding the form and degree of risk, allowing prey to make informed behavioural decisions. Such cues, however, may vary in both relative concentration detected (i.e. 'quantity') and reliability of the information available (i.e. 'quality'), leading to varying response patterns. Moreover, prey species are also known to exhibit consistent behavioural tactics towards managing risk (i.e. personality), possibly shaping their use of public information. Here, we present two experiments examining the potential interacting effects of personality and the quantity (Experiment 1) or quality (Experiment 2) of public information on the short-term predator avoidance responses of wild-caught Trinidadian guppies under semi-natural conditions. Our first experiment demonstrated that personality shaped responses to a high concentration of alarm cues (high risk), with shyer guppies exhibiting stronger antipredator responses than bolder guppies. When exposed to either low risk or stream water controls, personality had no effect on the intensity of response. Our second experiment demonstrated that personality again shaped the response to high concentrations of alarm cues (a known risk) but not to a novel chemosensory cue (tilapia odour). When exposed to the unknown novel cue, guppies exhibited a relatively high intensity antipredator response, regardless of personality. Combined, our results suggest that individual risk-taking tactics shape the use of public information in a context-dependent fashion.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24563039     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-014-0738-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  7 in total

1.  Consistent individual variation in plant communication: do plants have personalities?

Authors:  Richard Karban; Patrick Grof-Tisza; Charline Couchoux
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Repeatable aversion across threat types is linked with life-history traits but is dependent on how aversion is measured.

Authors:  Gabrielle L Davidson; Michael S Reichert; Jodie M S Crane; William O'Shea; John L Quinn
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Local predation risk shapes spatial and foraging neophobia patterns in Trinidadian guppies.

Authors:  Chris K Elvidge; Pierre J C Chuard; Grant E Brown
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.624

4.  Sender and receiver experience alters the response of fish to disturbance cues.

Authors:  Jack A Goldman; Laurence E A Feyten; Indar W Ramnarine; Grant E Brown
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 2.624

5.  Does exploratory behavior or activity in a wild mouse explain susceptibility to virus infection?

Authors:  Bram Vanden Broecke; Benny Borremans; Joachim Mariën; Rhodes H Makundi; Apia W Massawe; Herwig Leirs; Nelika K Hughes
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 2.624

6.  Bolder guppies do not have more mating partners, yet sire more offspring.

Authors:  Magdalena Herdegen-Radwan
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  The relationships between toad behaviour, antipredator defences, and spatial and sexual variation in predation pressure.

Authors:  Francisco Javier Zamora-Camacho
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.