Literature DB >> 35460444

Recent advancements in CRISPR/Cas technology for accelerated crop improvement.

Debajit Das1, Dhanawantari L Singha1, Ricky Raj Paswan2, Naimisha Chowdhury1, Monica Sharma1, Palakolanu Sudhakar Reddy3, Channakeshavaiah Chikkaputtaiah4,5.   

Abstract

MAIN
CONCLUSION: Precise genome engineering approaches could be perceived as a second paradigm for targeted trait improvement in crop plants, with the potential to overcome the constraints imposed by conventional CRISPR/Cas technology. The likelihood of reduced agricultural production due to highly turbulent climatic conditions increases as the global population expands. The second paradigm of stress-resilient crops with enhanced tolerance and increased productivity against various stresses is paramount to support global production and consumption equilibrium. Although traditional breeding approaches have substantially increased crop production and yield, effective strategies are anticipated to restore crop productivity even further in meeting the world's increasing food demands. CRISPR/Cas, which originated in prokaryotes, has surfaced as a coveted genome editing tool in recent decades, reshaping plant molecular biology in unprecedented ways and paving the way for engineering stress-tolerant crops. CRISPR/Cas is distinguished by its efficiency, high target specificity, and modularity, enables precise genetic modification of crop plants, allowing for the creation of allelic variations in the germplasm and the development of novel and more productive agricultural practices. Additionally, a slew of advanced biotechnologies premised on the CRISPR/Cas methodologies have augmented fundamental research and plant synthetic biology toolkits. Here, we describe gene editing tools, including CRISPR/Cas and its imitative tools, such as base and prime editing, multiplex genome editing, chromosome engineering followed by their implications in crop genetic improvement. Further, we comprehensively discuss the latest developments of CRISPR/Cas technology including CRISPR-mediated gene drive, tissue-specific genome editing, dCas9 mediated epigenetic modification and programmed self-elimination of transgenes in plants. Finally, we highlight the applicability and scope of advanced CRISPR-based techniques in crop genetic improvement.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Base editing; CRISPR-TSKO; CRISPR/Cas; Crop improvement; Gene drive; Prime editing; Transgene free

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35460444     DOI: 10.1007/s00425-022-03894-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  157 in total

1.  Activity and specificity of TRV-mediated gene editing in plants.

Authors:  Zahir Ali; Aala Abul-Faraj; Marek Piatek; Magdy M Mahfouz
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2015-06-03

Review 2.  Repair Pathway Choices and Consequences at the Double-Strand Break.

Authors:  Raphael Ceccaldi; Beatrice Rondinelli; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 20.808

3.  CRISPR-TSKO: A Tool for Tissue-Specific Genome Editing in Plants.

Authors:  Zahir Ali; Magdy M Mahfouz; Shahid Mansoor
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 18.313

4.  CRISPR-Cas9-mediated induction of heritable chromosomal translocations in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Natalja Beying; Carla Schmidt; Michael Pacher; Andreas Houben; Holger Puchta
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 15.793

5.  A Multipurpose Toolkit to Enable Advanced Genome Engineering in Plants.

Authors:  Tomáš Čermák; Shaun J Curtin; Javier Gil-Humanes; Radim Čegan; Thomas J Y Kono; Eva Konečná; Joseph J Belanto; Colby G Starker; Jade W Mathre; Rebecca L Greenstein; Daniel F Voytas
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 6.  Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Howard H Y Chang; Nicholas R Pannunzio; Noritaka Adachi; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  Pea early-browning virus-mediated genome editing via the CRISPR/Cas9 system in Nicotiana benthamiana and Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Zahir Ali; Ayman Eid; Shakila Ali; Magdy M Mahfouz
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.303

8.  Mimicking natural polymorphism in eIF4E by CRISPR-Cas9 base editing is associated with resistance to potyviruses.

Authors:  Anna Bastet; Delyan Zafirov; Nathalie Giovinazzo; Anouchka Guyon-Debast; Fabien Nogué; Christophe Robaglia; Jean-Luc Gallois
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 9.803

9.  Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA.

Authors:  Andrew V Anzalone; Peyton B Randolph; Jessie R Davis; Alexander A Sousa; Luke W Koblan; Jonathan M Levy; Peter J Chen; Christopher Wilson; Gregory A Newby; Aditya Raguram; David R Liu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 69.504

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.