Literature DB >> 33383029

Variation by state in Medicaid sterilization policies for physician reimbursement.

Heather Bouma-Johnston1, Roselle Ponsaran2, Kavita Shah Arora3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate state-level variation in Medicaid sterilization reimbursement policies for physicians in terms of policy details, flexibility, and review process. STUDY
DESIGN: We reviewed state Medicaid websites and interviewed state employees to better understand reimbursement policies and implementation. We attempted to obtain policy details and instructions for physicians from all 50 state Medicaid office websites. We invited employees in all 50 state Medicaid director's offices to participate in semi-structured qualitative interviews.
RESULTS: We were able to collect data from 48 states' websites for analysis, conducted 15 telephone interviews, and received 4 written responses from state Medicaid employees. State policies varied greatly in terms of degree of instruction available online to clinicians, number of content-related and logistical changes made compared to the federal policy, type of procedures included, corrections permitted, flexibility in terms of surgeon and procedure changes, review process, reasons for and ramifications of denial, and date of last policy revision.
CONCLUSION: There is need for increased transparency and instruction by state Medicaid offices as well as revision of the Medicaid policy to account for the contemporary clinical practice of female permanent contraception. Clinicians should communicate with state Medicaid employees in order to clarify important policy details and obtain greater understanding of their state's review process and ramifications to ensure their clinical practice is both correct and reimbursable. IMPLICATIONS: Greater consistency between states in terms of Medicaid policy and implementation is crucial to ensuring physicians are fairly reimbursed for their work, and female permanent contraception remains an accessible contraceptive method for women.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disparity; Health policy; Informed consent; Medicaid; Permanent contraception; Postpartum contraception

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33383029      PMCID: PMC7925370          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  19 in total

1.  Potential unintended pregnancies averted and cost savings associated with a revised Medicaid sterilization policy.

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Nikki Zite; Joseph E Potter; James Trussell; Kenneth Smith
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  A qualitative study of barriers to postpartum sterilization and women's attitudes toward unfulfilled sterilization requests.

Authors:  Melissa Gilliam; Shawna D Davis; Amy Berlin; Nikki B Zite
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Barriers to obtaining a desired postpartum tubal sterilization.

Authors:  Nikki Zite; Sara Wuellner; Melissa Gilliam
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Federally funded sterilization: time to rethink policy?

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Nikki Zite; Mitchell D Creinin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Medicaid sterilization consent forms: variation in rejection and payment consequences.

Authors:  Colin B Russell; Megan L Evans; Neena Qasba; Angela Frankel; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Adding injury to injury: ethical implications of the Medicaid sterilization consent regulations.

Authors:  Benjamin P Brown; Julie Chor
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Racial variation in tubal sterilization rates: role of patient-level factors.

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Kaleab Abebe; Christine Dehlendorf; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Mitchell D Creinin; Cara Nikolajski; Said Ibrahim
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  One-year follow-up of women with unfulfilled postpartum sterilization requests.

Authors:  Andrea Ries Thurman; Torri Janecek
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Implicit Bias in Counseling for Permanent Contraception: Historical Context and Recommendations for Counseling.

Authors:  Cosette A Kathawa; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2020-07-17

10.  Obstetrician-gynecologists' counseling regarding postpartum sterilization.

Authors:  Kavita Shah Arora; Neko Castleberry; Jay Schulkin
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-08-13
View more
  4 in total

1.  Variation in the interpretation and application of the Medicaid sterilization consent form among Medicaid officials.

Authors:  Colin B Russell; Neena Qasba; Megan L Evans; Angela Frankel; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  Website Review of Variation in Individual State Medicaid Sterilization Policies.

Authors:  Heather Bouma-Johnston; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 7.623

3.  Satisfaction, Resignation, and Dissatisfaction with Long-Acting Reversible Contraception among Low-Income Postpartum Texans.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Ela; Kathleen Broussard; Katie Hansen; Kristen L Burke; Lauren Thaxton; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2022-04-19

4.  Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Practices in Postpartum Sterilization Without a Valid Medicaid Consent Form.

Authors:  Kavita Shah Arora; Roselle Ponsaran; Laura Morello; Leila Katabi; Rosemary T Behmer Hansen; Nikki Zite; Kari White
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 7.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.