| Literature DB >> 35459166 |
Madiha Haider1,2, Vivek Anand1,2, M Ghalib Enayathullah3, Yash Parekh3, Sushma Ram3, Surekha Kumari2,4, Gayatri Panda5, Manjari Shukla6, Dhwani Dholakia1,2, Arjun Ray5, Sudipta Bhattacharyya6, Upendra Sharma2,4, Kiran Kumar Bokara3, Bhavana Prasher7,8,9, Mitali Mukerji10,11,12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Viral infections have a history of abrupt and severe eruptions through the years in the form of pandemics. And yet, definitive therapies or preventive measures are not present. Herbal medicines have been a source of various antiviral compounds such as Oseltamivir, extracted using shikimic acid from star anise (Illicium verum) and Acyclovir from Carissa edulis are FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved antiviral drugs. In this study, we dissect the anti-coronavirus infection activity of Cissampelos pareira L (Cipa) extract using an integrative approach.Entities:
Keywords: Antivirus; BALF; COVID-19; Cissampelos pareira L.; Connectivity map; SARS-CoV-2; Whole plant extract
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35459166 PMCID: PMC9028906 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-022-03584-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Med Ther ISSN: 2662-7671
Connectivity scores of small compounds with repurposing potential against SARS-CoV-2 as predicted by various studies
| Compounds | Score | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| (Dyall et al., 2014) [ | ||
| Chloroquine | -45.51 | |
| mefloquine | -3.93 | |
| Amodiaquine | -13.11 | |
| Gemcitabine | 1.59 | |
| Tamoxifen | -23.6 | |
| Toremifene | -17.23 | |
| Terconazole | -14.17 | |
| Fluspirilene | -35.73 | |
| Thiothixene | -1.66 | |
| Fluphenazine | 17.51 | |
| Chlorpromazine | -77.85 | |
| Triflupromazine | -0.35 | |
| Clomipramine | -11.65 | |
| Imatinib | -1.34 | |
| Dasatinib | -75.92 | |
| Vidarabine | -2.82 | (Micholas and Jeremy C., 2020) [ |
| eriodictyol | -13.82 | |
| phenformin | 1.23 | |
| (Gordon et al., 2020) [ | ||
| Haloperidol | -0.74 | |
| Entacapone | 6.41 | |
| Metformin | 4.37 | |
| H-89 | -82.31 | |
| Ribavirin | 7.17 | |
| Midostaurin | 48.43 | |
| Daunorubicin | -73.76 | |
| Captopril | 13.92 | |
| Chloramphenicol | -21.3 | |
| Linezolid | 17.29 | |
| Irbesartan | 1.09 | (Y. Zhou et al., 2020) [ |
| Equilin | 22.26 | |
| Mesalazine | 7.09 | |
| Mercaptopurine | 6.02 | |
| Paroxetine | -1.84 | |
| Carvedilol | -13.58 | |
| Dactinomycin | -39.25 | |
| Eplerenone | 10.74 | |
| Oxymetholone | -2.34 |
Fig. 1Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro by Cipa whole extract and its constituents: Relative viral RNA % and Log reduction in viral particles in vero cells upon treatment at 50, 100, 150 and 200 μg of A) whole plant aqueous extract (PE), B) root extract (PER) and C) hydro-alcoholic extracts (PE50) of Cipa. D Sars-cov-2 viral titers inhibition by Cipa constituents CP-2 Salutaridine, CP-3 Cissamine, CP-5 pareirarine, CP-7 Magnoflorine, PE aqueous extract, PE50 50% hydroalcoholic extract and PER root extract. The error bars have been represented in the figures with (p < 0.05) and the experiments were done in triplicates
Fig. 2Molecular structures of the major components of the compounds isolated from Cipa and used to determine anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity
Fig. 3Cipa principal bioactive compounds bind crucial SARS-CoV2 therapeutic targets. A represents molecular docking of Magnoflorine at the active site pocket of SARS-CoV2 3C-like protease. B represents molecular docking of Salutaridine with ACE2 interacting amino acid residues of Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) from SARS-Cov2 spike protein. The middle and the right panels of each figure represent the zoomed in view of the molecular interaction patterns of the docked ligands in three-dimensional and two-dimensional spaces respectively. In the two-dimensional interaction plots, the green dotted lines indicate hydrogen bond formation, whereas the hydrophobic interactions are represented by the spiked arcs
Fig. 4Comparative analysis of Cipa with BALF-1 and BALF-2 transcriptome: Functional enrichment of genes common between A) Cipa and BALF-1, B) Cipa and BALF-2 and C) Cipa, BALF-1 and BALF-2. D Small compound signatures common between all three, the space on the left of the vertical axis indicates negative signatures while the one on the right indicates positive signatures. E Genetic signatures common between all three, the space on the left of the vertical axis indicates negative signatures while the one on the right indicates positive signatures