| Literature DB >> 35459121 |
Kai Wei1,2, Gesheng Song3, Linhe Xi4, Juan Chen1,2, Chuancai Sun1,2, Ping Chen1,2, Yong Wei1,2, Li Wang1,2, Xianglei Kong1,2, Yang Li1,2, Dongmei Xu1,2, Xiaoyan Jia5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is not only a bone-derived factor involved in metabolism, but also a biomarker of kidney disease and cardiovascular pathophysiology. We conducted this cross-sectional observational study to explore relationships between plasma NGAL and thoracic aorta calcification (TAC) in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients with and without diabetes.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes; Maintenance hemodialysis; Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; Thoracic aorta calcification
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35459121 PMCID: PMC9026670 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-022-02773-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.585
Characteristics of total MHD patients, MHD patients with and without diabetes
| Characteristic | Total( | With diabetes( | Without diabetes( | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male(0)/female(1) | 30/32 | 14/13 | 16/19 | 0.798 |
| Age (year) | 58.10 ± 15.98 | 65.33 ± 13.17 | 52.51 ± 15.87 | |
| Smoking, (%) | 21.0 | 25.9 | 17.1 | 0.297 |
| Vintage (months) | 29.27(8.65, 78.02) | 19.28(3.78, 52.50) | 40.27(16.16, 98.00) | |
| Residual urine volume (ml/24 h) | 0(0, 200) | 100(0, 400) | 0(0, 150) | 0.123 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 155.05 ± 21.53 | 163.37 ± 17.68 | 148.63 ± 22.24 | |
| DBP (mmHg) | 79.03 ± 16.13 | 68.48 ± 11.92 | 87.17 ± 14.32 | |
| Comorbid CHD, (%) | 30.6 | 40.7 | 22.9 | 0.108 |
| NGAL (ng/mL) | 52.02(43.11, 422.30) | 49.33(42.37,55.48) | 56.78(44.37,674.13) | |
| Klotho (pg/mL) | 308.49(76.94, 877.32) | 265.22(11.70, 1391.19) | 319.96(138.46,608.23) | 0.836 |
| Ca (mmol/L) | 2.29(2.17, 2.41) | 2.21(2.12, 2.32) | 2.35(2.27, 2.51) | |
| P (mmol/L) | 1.82(1.52, 2.26) | 1.67(1.49, 1.91) | 1.97(1.53, 2.53) | |
| iPTH (pg/mL) | 245.4 0(122.35, 864.75) | 165.00(79.53, 274.80) | 745.60(162.30, 1775.00) | |
| ALP(U/L) | 75.00(60.00, 146.25) | 73.00(59.00, 91.00) | 110.00(60.00, 353.00) | |
| K (mmol/L) | 5.02(4.44, 5.51) | 4.86(4.45, 5.73) | 5.10(4.40, 5.45) | 0.943 |
| HCO3−(mmol/L) | 20.04 ± 3.25 | 20.21 ± 2.90 | 19.91 ± 3.53 | 0.716 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 24.66 ± 6.09 | 23.50 ± 5.79 | 25.55 ± 6.24 | 0.191 |
| Cr (μmol/L) | 786.50(680.60, 922.00) | 707.00(535.00, 752.00) | 884.00(754.00, 1038.00) | |
| Alb(g/L) | 41.1(39.0, 43.75) | 39.30(35.30, 42.10) | 42.1(39.8, 44.60) | |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.04 ± 0.59 | 2.02 ± 0.67 | 2.06 ± 0.52 | 0.800 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.22(0.88,1.77) | 1.12(0.88,1.75) | 1.29(0.88,2.17) | 0.247 |
| SF (ng/mL) | 155.10(80.13, 317.25) | 135.87(83.65, 249.71) | 197.64(78.19, 405.49) | 0.089 |
| Hb(g/L) | 112.00(100.00, 121.25) | 117.00(100.00, 124.00) | 111.00(100.00, 119.00) | 0.259 |
| WBC(910^9/L) | 6.06(4.55,7.37) | 6.62(5.47, 7.98) | 5.11(4.23, 7.29) | |
| PLT(510^9/L) | 189.50(160.00, 22D1.75) | 203.00(145.00, 247.00) | 184.00(164.00, 199.00) | 0.338 |
| Dialyzer membrane | ||||
| CTA, (%) | 35.5 | 22.2 | 45.7 | |
| PS, (%) | 54.8 | 63.0 | 48.6 | 0.192 |
| PMMA, (%) | 9.7 | 14.8 | 5.7 | 0.221 |
| Calciums, (%) | 79.0 | 66.7 | 88.6 | |
| Calcium free phosphorus binders carbonate) | ||||
| Sevelamer, (%) | 25.8 | 3.7 | 42.9 | |
| Lanthanum carbonate, (%) | 16.1 | 18.5 | 14.3 | 0.735 |
| Active vitamin D, (%) | 29.0 | 7.4 | 45.7 | |
| Paricalcitol, (%) | 8.1 | 3.7 | 11.4 | 0.376 |
| Statins, (%) | 16.1 | 33.3 | 2.9 | |
Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed variables and as median (interquartile range) for variables with skewed distribution. Differences between patients with and without diabetes were assessed using the t test, Mann–Whitney U test or Chi-square analysis, as appropriate. Values with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant and are indicated in bold
MHD maintenance hemodialysis, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, CHD Coronary heart disease, NGAL neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, Ca calcium, P phosphate, iPTH intact parathyroid hormone, ALP alkaline phosphatase, K potassium, HCO3- carbonate ion, BUN blood urea nitrogen, Cr creatinine, Alb albumin, LDL low density lipoprotein, TG triglyceride, SF serum ferritin, Hb hemoglobin, WBC white blood cells, PLT platelet, HD hemodialysis, HFD high-flux hemodialysis, HDF hemodiafiltration, CTA cellulose triacetate, PS polysulfone, PMMA polymethylmethacrylate
Thoracic aorta calcification incidences of total MHD patients, MHD patients with and without diabetes
| Characteristic | Total ( | With diabetes ( | Without diabetes ( | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | ||||
| TC | 35, 81.4% | 19, 86.4% | 16, 76.2% | 0.457 |
| ARC | 13, 30.2% | 7, 31.8% | 6, 28.6% | 1.000 |
| ATAC | 15, 34.9% | 8, 36.8% | 7, 33.3% | 1.000 |
| AAC | 35, 81.4% | 19, 86.4% | 16, 76.2% | 0.457 |
| DTAC | 32, 74.4% | 18, 81.8% | 14, 66.7% | 0.310 |
| Routine chest radiography | ||||
| AAC | 18, 75% | 6, 100% | 12, 66.7% | 0.277 |
| AAC by CT or chest radiography | ||||
| 49, 79.0% | 24, 88.9% | 25, 71.4% | 0.122 |
Thoracic aorta calcium estimated by computed tomography (CT): calcification volume quantified by extracting the aorta calcium with density ≥ 130 HU from the volume-rendered image under the assistance of semi-automatic software; thoracic aorta was divided into 4 sites, aortic root calcium (ARC), ascending aorta calcium (ATAC), AAC (aortic arch calcium), DTAC(descending thoracic aorta calcium) and TC (total calcium) were all calculated
AAC by routine chest radiography: the circumferences of aortic arch was divided into 16 sites, the number of sectors with calcification was calculated and multiplied by 100 to express the results as a percentage
Thoracic aorta calcification parameter values of total MHD patients, MHD patients with and without diabetes
| Characteristic | Total ( | With diabetes ( | Without diabetes ( | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | ||||
| TC (mL) | 9.55(0.70, 23.65) | 11.86(4.74, 32.09) | 5.27(0.14, 18.13) | 0.176 |
| ARC (mL) | 0(0, 0.46) | 0(0, 0.65) | 0(0, 0.39) | 0.709 |
| ATAC (mL) | 0(0, 0.58) | 0(0, 0.69) | 0(0, 0.64) | 0.819 |
| AAC (mL) | 3.65(0.49, 8.08) | 4.32(0.61, 8.28) | 1.70(0.14, 9.21) | 0.670 |
| DTAC (mL) | 5.38(0, 11.71) | 7.05(2.24, 20.29) | 3.31(0, 8.85) | 0.070 |
| Routine chest radiography | ||||
| AAC(%) | 21.88(1.56, 35.94) | 31.25(25.00, 53.12) | 18.75(0, 28.13) | 0.090 |
Thoracic aorta calcium estimated by computed tomography (CT): calcification volume quantified by extracting the aorta calcium with density ≥ 130 HU from the volume-rendered image under the assistance of semi-automatic software; thoracic aorta was divided into 4 sites, aortic root calcium (ARC), ascending aorta calcium (ATAC), AAC(aortic arch calcium), DTAC(descending thoracic aorta calcium) and TC (total calcium) were all calculated
AAC by routine chest radiography: the circumferences of aortic arch was divided into 16 sites, the number of sectors with calcification was calculated and multiplied by 100 to express the results as a percentage
Univariable logistic regression analyses of lg (NGAL (ng/mL)) and thoracic aorta calcification in MHD patients (n = 62)
| Characteristic | OR (95% CI) | P |
|---|---|---|
| CT | ||
| TC | 1.124(0.213-5.946) | 0.890 |
| ARC | 5.581(1.204-25.871) | |
| ATAC | 1.586(0.431-5.834) | 0.488 |
| AAC | 1.124(0.213-5.946) | 0.890 |
| DTAC | 1.539(0.317-7.468) | 0.593 |
| Routine chest radiography | ||
| AAC | 0.499(0.101-2.470) | 0.394 |
| AAC by CT or chest radiography | ||
| 0.561(0.195-1.611) | 0.283 |
Thoracic aorta calcium estimated by computed tomography (CT): calcification volume quantified by extracting the aorta calcium with density ≥ 130 HU from the volume-rendered image under the assistance of semi-automatic software; thoracic aorta was divided into 4 sites, aortic root calcium (ARC), ascending aorta calcium (ATAC), AAC(aortic arch calcium), DTAC(descending thoracic aorta calcium) and TC (total calcium) were all calculated
AAC by routine chest radiography: the circumferences of aortic arch was divided into 16 sites, the number of sectors with calcification was calculated and multiplied by 100 to express the results as a percentage
Logistic regression analyses of lg (NGAL (ng/mL)) and aortic root calcium (ARC) in MHD patients (n = 43)
| Models | OR (95% CI) | P |
|---|---|---|
| Univariable analysis | 5.581(1.204-25.871) | |
| Multivariable-adjusted analysis | ||
| Age and sex | 13.335(1.781-99.829) | |
| Comorbid CHD | 18.675(1.791-194.711) | |
| Ca | 2.561(0.342-19.172) | 0.360 |
| Vintage (months) | 3.410(0.497-23.393) | 0.212 |
| Active vitamin D | 4.988(1.053-23.641) | |
NGAL neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, CHD Coronary heart disease, Ca calcium
Spearman coefficients between lg (NGAL (ng/mL)) and thoracic aorta calcification parameter values of total MHD patients, MHD patients with and without diabetes
| Characteristic | Total | With diabetes | Without diabetes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | R | P | R | P | R | P | |||
| TC (mL) | 0.081 | 0.607 | −0.025 | 0.911 | 0.149 | 0.519 | |||
| ARC (mL) | 0.271 | 0.079 | −0.076 | 0.737 | |||||
| ATAC (mL) | 0.092 | 0.555 | −0.127 | 0.573 | 0.273 | 0.231 | |||
| AAC (mL) | 0.107 | 0.495 | 0.143 | 0.525 | 0.068 | 0.770 | |||
| DTAC (mL) | 0.060 | 0.702 | −0.113 | 0.618 | 0.169 | 0.465 | |||
| Routine chest radiography | |||||||||
| AAC(%) | −0.199 | 0.351 | 0.213 | 0.686 | −0.053 | 0.835 | |||
Thoracic aorta calcium estimated by computed tomography (CT): calcification volume quantified by extracting the aorta calcium with density and without diabetesiplied by 100 to express the results as a percentage.matic software; thoracic aorta was divided into 4 sites, aortic root calcium (ARC), ascending aorta calcium (ATAC), AAC(aortic arch calcium), DTAC(descending thoracic aorta calcium) and TC (total calcium) were all calculated
AAC by routine chest radiography: the circumferences of aortic arch was divided into 16 sites, the number of sectors with calcification was calculated and multiplied by 100 to express the results as a percentage
Partial coefficients between lg (NGAL (ng/mL)) and aortic root calcium (ARC) parameter values of MHD patients without diabetes (n = 21)
| Adjusted characters | R | P |
|---|---|---|
| Age and sex | 0.550 | |
| Age, sex and comorbid CHD | 0.565 | |
| Age, sex, comorbid CHD and Alb | 0.536 | |
| Age, sex, comorbid CHD, Alb, and Ca | 0.175 | 0.518 |
| Age, sex, comorbid CHD, Alb, and Dialyzer membrane(PS) | 0.590 |
NGAL neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, CHD Coronary heart disease, Alb albumin, Ca calcium, PS polysulfone
Fig. 1Scatter diagrams and Spearman coefficient between NGAL, Ca and ARC of MHD patients without diabetes (n = 21)