Literature DB >> 35458437

Identification and Characterization of vB_PreP_EPr2, a Lytic Bacteriophage of Pan-Drug Resistant Providencia rettgeri.

Jaime L Mencke1,2, Yunxiu He1, Andrey A Filippov1, Mikeljon P Nikolich1, Ashton T Belew1, Derrick E Fouts3, Patrick T McGann4, Brett E Swierczewski5, Derese Getnet1, Damon W Ellison1, Katie R Margulieux1.   

Abstract

Providencia rettgeri is an emerging opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen with reports of increasing antibiotic resistance. Pan-drug resistant (PDR) P. rettgeri infections are a growing concern, demonstrating a need for the development of alternative treatment options which is fueling a renewed interest in bacteriophage (phage) therapy. Here, we identify and characterize phage vB_PreP_EPr2 (EPr2) with lytic activity against PDR P. rettgeri MRSN 845308, a clinical isolate that carries multiple antibiotic resistance genes. EPr2 was isolated from an environmental water sample and belongs to the family Autographiviridae, subfamily Studiervirinae and genus Kayfunavirus, with a genome size of 41,261 base pairs. Additional phenotypic characterization showed an optimal MOI of 1 and a burst size of 12.3 ± 3.4 PFU per bacterium. EPr2 was determined to have a narrow host range against a panel of clinical P. rettgeri strains. Despite this fact, EPr2 is a promising lytic phage with potential for use as an alternative therapeutic for treatment of PDR P. rettgeri infections.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autographiviridae; Kayfunavirus; Providencia rettgeri; Studiervirinae; bacteriophage; pan-drug resistance; podophage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35458437      PMCID: PMC9026810          DOI: 10.3390/v14040708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Viruses        ISSN: 1999-4915            Impact factor:   5.818


1. Introduction

Providencia rettgeri is a Gram-negative bacterial pathogen from the Enterobacteriaceae family and is an emerging cause of nosocomial infections [1,2]. Infections caused by P. rettgeri are typically linked to catheter placements and travelers’ diarrhea, but cellulitis, sepsis, and meningitis have also been reported, predominantly in immunocompromised individuals [2,3,4]. P. rettgeri is intrinsically resistant to the antibiotics colistin and tigecycline and has the ability to acquire additional drug resistance against antibiotic classes commonly used to treat infections [5]. Several studies have identified P. rettgeri strains that produce extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenemases [6,7,8,9,10]. Increasing incidence of multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and pan-drug resistant (PDR) P. rettgeri has been reported, severely limiting available treatment options in the clinical setting [7,8,9]. Bacteriophage (phage) therapy is an alternative treatment option being developed against bacterial infections, including those caused by drug-resistant strains. Phage mechanisms of action are distinct from those of antibiotics, and phages have been shown to target and kill MDR strains of both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial species [11,12,13]. Recent publications have also demonstrated the potential benefit of phage-induced resensitization of MDR bacterial strains to antibiotics [14,15,16,17]. Additionally, the specificity of phages allows targeted treatment of bacterial infections without compromising patient’s normal microflora [12]. There are a limited number of lytic phages isolated and characterized with activity against P. rettgeri strains [18,19]. Identification of additional phages that target P. rettgeri will provide the opportunity to develop robust phage therapeutics against this emerging pathogen. PDR P. rettgeri MRSN 845308 was isolated from a patient receiving care for COVID-19 in Texas, USA in December 2020 [9]. The patient’s symptoms did not improve with antibiotic therapy (vancomycin and cefepime), so the strain underwent further characterization by the Multidrug-Resistant Organism Repository and Surveillance Network (MRSN) at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR). P. rettgeri MRSN 845308 was found to be non-susceptible to all available antibiotics and whole genome sequencing analysis showed that the strain possessed multiple antibiotic resistance genes, including blaNDM-1, blaPER-1, and rmtB2 [9]. In this study, we report the isolation and characterization of phage vB_PreP_EPr2 (EPr2) from an environmental water sample with lytic activity against P. rettgeri MRSN 845308.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains

Bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. P. rettgeri were obtained from the MRSN and the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). Bacteria were grown in Heart Infusion Broth (HIB) with shaking (200 rpm) or on HIB agar plates at 37 °C overnight.
Table 1

Host Range of EPr2.

P. rettgeri Strain IDCollection DateIsolate SourceEPr2 Sensitivity 3
MRSN 129654 December 2012Surveillance
MRSN 212253 March 2014Respiratory
MRSN 2656313 October 2014Urine
MRSN 3124523 July 2015Stool
MRSN 3278810 August 2015Stool
MRSN 3347524 August 2015Wound
MRSN 38649622 April 2016Urine
MRSN 76861126 March 2020Urine
MRSN 845308 1,21 November 2020Blood+
MRSN 849144 26 November 2020Surveillance+
MRSN 849312 29 November 2020Blood+
MRSN 87736025 December 2020Urine
MRSN 88352624 February 2021Surveillance
ATCC 29944N/A 4N/A

1 EPr2 host strain. 2 Strains isolated from same patient. 3 “−“ = no sensitivity, “+” = sensitivity. 4 N/A = not available.

2.2. Phage Isolation and Propagation

The phage EPr2 was isolated from environmental water collected from Rock Creek in Bethesda, MD, USA. The environmental water was filtered using sterile 0.22 µm filters (MilliporeSigma, Bollington, MA, USA) prior to phage enrichment. To enrich for P. rettgeri phages, 5 × HIB was mixed with the filter-sterilized environmental water sample at a 1:5 ratio and overnight broth culture of P. rettgeri MRSN 845308 was added. The enrichment mixture was incubated overnight at 37 °C with shaking at 200 rpm, after which the supernatant was sterilized using a 0.22 µm filter. The resulting lysate was assessed for phage activity against P. rettgeri MRSN 845308 through plating on double-layer HIB agar plates [20]. Phage purification was performed by three rounds of sequential single plaque isolation until uniform plaque morphology was achieved. Plaque morphology was analyzed using ImageJ software v. 1.53 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). High titer phage lysates were obtained by liquid culture propagation of the phage in HIB supplemented with 0.5 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, and 0.1% glucose. Phages were harvested after supernatant filtration with a 0.22 µm filter and centrifugation and stored in SM buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 99 mM NaCl, 8 mM MgSO4, 0.01% gelatin) (Teknova, Hollister, CA, USA) at 4 °C protected from light. Plaque-forming units (PFUs) per ml were determined through 10-fold dilution in SM buffer and plating on double-layer agar plates.

2.3. Host Range Testing

The host range was determined against the P. rettgeri strains listed in Table 1 as described previously using a micro-spot dilution assay on square grid double-layer agar plates [21]. Lytic activity was determined positive if plaque formation was observed after overnight plate incubation at 37 °C. Host range testing was performed in two separate replicates with representative results reported.

2.4. Transmission Electron Microscopy

EPr2 was prepared for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging as previously described [22]. Briefly, phages were washed twice with 0.1% ammonium acetate using high-speed centrifugation. Prepared phage particles were stained with 2% uranyl acetate for 1 min after being deposited on 300 mesh carbon-coated copper grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). Samples were examined in a JEOL JEM-1400 electron microscope at 80 kv. Image analysis was conducted using Image J software v. 1.53 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

2.5. Bacterial Strains Lytic Properties Assay

The dynamics of EPr2 lysis against P. rettgeri MRSN 845308 was determined as previously described [23]. Briefly, phage were mixed with a mid-log phase bacterial culture (OD600 = 0.5) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1, 0.1, 0.01, 0.001, and 0. The mixed culture was incubated at 37 °C with shaking at 200 rpm for the duration of the experiment. OD600 readings were taken every 10–20 min for 3 h. Experiments were repeated independently three times and analyzed using GraphPad Prism v. 9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

2.6. Determination of Optimal Multiplicity of Infection

The optimal MOI of EPr2 was determined as previously described [24]. Briefly, phage particles at various MOIs were added to mid-log phase bacterial culture (OD600 = 0.5) and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C with shaking at 200 rpm. The samples were centrifuged for 10 min and the supernatant was filtered using a 0.22 µm filter. Phage titer for each sample was determined by plating on double-layer agar plates. Experiments were repeated independently three times and analyzed using GraphPad Prism v. 9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

2.7. One Step Growth Curve

One-step growth curve experiments were performed as previously described [25]. Briefly, 1 mL of 5 × 106 PFU/mL EPr2 stock was mixed with 1 mL of mid-log phase bacterial culture in HIB and allowed to adsorb for 5 min at 37 °C. The mixture was then diluted with fresh HIB and incubated at 37 °C for the duration of the experiment. Samples were taken every 5 min and plated using the double-layer agar plate method to determine phage titer. Experiments were repeated independently three times and analyzed using GraphPad Prism v. 9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

2.8. DNA Extraction and Whole Genome Sequencing

DNA extraction was performed using a modified QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) protocol as described previously [26]. Briefly, a high-titer phage sample was treated with 2.5 U/mL DNase and 0.7 mg/mL RNase for 1.5 h at 37 °C, after which 20 mM EDTA was added to the sample. Next, the sample was treated with 3 µL of proteinase K and incubated for 1.5 h at 56 °C. An equal volume of Buffer AL was added to the treated phage lysate and QIAamp DNA Mini Kit instructions were followed to complete the DNA extraction. Whole genome sequencing libraries were constructed from extracted EPr2 DNA using the KAPA HyperPlus Library preparation kit (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The prepared library was sequenced using MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 (600 cycle; 2 × 300 bp) (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Whole genome sequencing analysis and phylogenetic analysis was performed as described in Supplementary Material Document S1. Briefly, paired end sequences were evaluated for quality then used for assembly with Unicycler [27]. The phage genome termini were determined using PhageTerm [28], and protein coding sequences (CDSs) were predicted and annotated using Prodigal [29]. The sequencing data is available in GenBank (accession number OM256482).

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Characterization of EPr2

The phage EPr2 was isolated from an environmental water sample from Rock Creek in Bethesda, Maryland, USA against the host strain P. rettgeri MRSN 845308. EPr2 forms large plaques of 2.4 ± 0.6 mm diameter with a halo that further extends 2.7 ± 0.3 mm from the edge of the plaque (Figure 1A). The phage particle morphology was observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The TEM images showed that phage EPr2 has an icosahedral structure head with an approximate diameter of 43.7 ± 2.2 nm with a short non-contractile tail (Figure 1B). Based on these characteristics and in accordance with the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), EPr2 is morphologically classified as a podophage.
Figure 1

Morphological characterization of phage EPr2. (A) EPr2 plaque morphology on P. rettgeri MRSN 845308 and (B) TEM image.

3.2. Host Range of EPr2

The host range of EPr2 was evaluated against 14 strains of P. rettgeri, 13 of which were clinical isolates collected by the MRSN from 2012–2021, and one strain was acquired from ATCC (Table 1). The results indicated that EPr2 has a narrow host range against the strains tested, only exhibiting lysis against three PDR isolates from the same patient within a short time period, including the initial host strain (Table 1). EPr2 was not active against other P. rettgeri strains collected from different sources.

3.3. Lytic Properties of EPr2

The dynamics of host strain lysis were measured at various MOIs of EPr2. The most rapid and robust lytic effect was demonstrated with an MOI of 1 starting after 30 min incubation and reaching full lysis at 90 min. Reduced MOIs resulted in increasing delay in and completeness of observed lysis (Figure 2A).
Figure 2

Lytic properties of phage EPr2 (A) EPr2 lysis dynamics against P. rettgeri MRSN 845308, (B) optimal MOI, and (C) one-step growth curve.

To determine optimal MOI of EPr2, mid log-phase cultures of P. rettgeri MRSN 845308 were incubated with phage MOIs of 0.0001 to 1. The highest phage titer achieved was 3.5 × 109 PFU/mL with a starting MOI of 1 (Figure 2B). Lower starting MOIs resulted in decreasing total phage titer. A one-step growth curve of EPr2 was also performed. The latent phase was estimated to be 20 min, followed by a rise phase of 10 min, and a plateau phase reached 30 min after initial infection (Figure 2C). The average burst size of EPr2 was estimated to be 12.3 ± 3.4 PFU per infected cell.

3.4. Genomic Analysis of EPr2

Phage EPr2 has a 41,261 base pair (bp) genome with a G + C content of 50.2% (GenBank accession no. OM256482). It has short 179 bp direct terminal repeats that were identified using PhageTerm [28]. Annotation of EPr2 resulted in the prediction of 69 CDSs. No antibiotic resistance genes, toxin genes, or other bacterial virulence genes were identified. BLASTn analysis against the NCBI non-redundant (NR) database assigned EPr2 to the family Autographiviridae, subfamily Studiervirinae and genus Kayfunavirus. The BLASTn results showed that EPr2 does not share high similarity with any known Providencia sp. phages. The most closely related phages to EPr2 targeted diverse bacterial host species, predominantly Escherichia, Salmonella, and Citrobacter. A phylogenetic tree was constructed with EPr2, 12 phages included in the top BLASTn results, 22 Providencia sp. phages, and 5 reference phages related to Providencia phages (Figure 3) [19]. Phage EPr2 was shown to share the most similarity with Escherichia coli phages through the phylogenetic analysis.
Figure 3

Phylogenetic tree of Providencia phage EPr2. A whole-genome average nucleotide distance tree was constructed for 40 total phage genomes (22 phages that infect Providencia species (green leaves), 5 phages related to known Providencia phages (black leaves), 12 with top BLASTn matches (blue leaves) and vB_PReP_EPr2 (bold red leaf) with MASH [30] (sketch size of s = 5000, k-mer size of k = 12 and GGRaSP [31] (see Supplementary Materials and Methods). Color strips denote taxonomic assignments (see key). The scale bar represents percent average nucleotide divergence.

4. Discussion

P. rettgeri is an important emerging pathogen associated with drug-resistant hospital-associated infections. Several reports have identified P. rettgeri strains that harbor ESBL and carbapenemase genes, resulting in difficult to treat infections in a clinical setting, including the recent report of PDR P. rettgeri MRSN 845308 isolated from a patient being treated for COVID-19 [2,9]. Phage therapy offers a potential alternative treatment method for these MDR, XDR, and PDR strains [11,12]. In this study, we report the phenotypic and genomic characteristics of phage EPr2 with lytic activity against P. rettgeri MRSN 845308. Morphologically, EPr2 has an icosahedral head and short, non-contractile tail consistent with classic podovirus morphology. EPr2 forms large plaques with a halo, indicating production of a polysaccharide depolymerase and potential antibiofilm activity [32]. It has an optimal MOI of 1 and a relatively low burst size of 12.3 ± 3.4 PFU per bacterium. EPr2 belongs to the family Autographiviridae, subfamily Studiervirinae and genus Kayfunavirus, which include phages with short, non-contractile tails. To our knowledge, no other Autographiviridae Kayfunavirus phages that target Providencia sp. have been reported to date. Genomic analysis showed a 41,261 bp genome that appears to not carry any genes that would disqualify EPr2 from therapeutic use. The P. rettgeri strains tested are representative isolates collected from US military treatment facilities from 2012–2021. EPr2 has a narrow host range against this set, with lytic activity specific to the original PDR strains isolated within a short time period from the same patient. Interestingly, genome comparisons using NCBI BLASTn and phylogenetic analysis showed that EPr2 is the most similar to Autographiviridae Kayfunavirus phages that target E. coli and other Enterobacteriaceae, highlighting the lack of similar published P. rettgeri phages and an opportunity to further study potential cross-species lytic activity of EPr2. Ideally, multiple phages would be used together in a cocktail with activity against a P. rettgeri infection to improve host range and minimize the opportunity for resistance to arise during therapy. However, there are currently limited P. rettgeri phages reported in the literature that may be suitable for therapeutic development. Oliveira et al. reported phage vB_PreS_PR1, a Siphoviridae phage with a plaque size of under 0.1 mm and broad host range activity against MDR P. rettgeri clinical isolates [18]. A study by Rakov et al. identified 12 phages with lytic activity against Providencia stuartii and P. rettgeri as part of the Israeli Phage Bank (IPB), including activity against biofilms [19]. The phages in that study represented Siphoviridae, Myoviridae, and Autographiviridae phylogenetic families and 39/41 Providencia sp. strains showed susceptibility to at least one phage [19]. In comparison, EPr2 forms large plaques with a halo, belongs to the Autographiviridae family, and has a narrow host range. This indicates a broad diversity of P. rettgeri phages and suggests that discovery of additional phages is required for the development of a broad-coverage therapeutic phage cocktail. In summary, we report the isolation and characterization of EPr2, a lytic phage with activity against the PDR clinical isolate P. rettgeri MRSN 845308. This study provides evidence that phage treatment is a viable alternative therapeutic option for PDR P. rettgeri infections. Importantly, EPr2 was discovered and isolated in one week from a single environmental source, indicating phages that target clinical P. rettgeri strains can be identified rapidly and on demand. EPr2 demonstrates desirable characteristics for a therapeutic phage, including strong lytic activity against a PDR strain of interest and no genes indicative of a lysogenic lifestyle, drug resistance, or virulence. It is important to continue phage hunting for Providencia sp. phages as infections rise and drug resistance profiles continue to evolve, rendering most or all available antibiotics ineffective.
  61 in total

1.  ARG-ANNOT, a new bioinformatic tool to discover antibiotic resistance genes in bacterial genomes.

Authors:  Sushim Kumar Gupta; Babu Roshan Padmanabhan; Seydina M Diene; Rafael Lopez-Rojas; Marie Kempf; Luce Landraud; Jean-Marc Rolain
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Lytic bacteriophages facilitate antibiotic sensitization of Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  Gregory S Canfield; Anushila Chatterjee; Juliel Espinosa; Mihnea R Mangalea; Emma K Sheriff; Micah Keidan; Sara W McBride; Bruce D McCollister; Howard C Hang; Breck A Duerkop
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  tRNAscan-SE: Searching for tRNA Genes in Genomic Sequences.

Authors:  Patricia P Chan; Todd M Lowe
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

4.  Practical Advice on the One-Step Growth Curve.

Authors:  Andrew M Kropinski
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2018

5.  Importance of Providencia species as a major cause of travellers' diarrhoea.

Authors:  Myonsun Yoh; Junko Matsuyama; Motoki Ohnishi; Kazuhiro Takagi; Hirozane Miyagi; Kazuhiro Mori; Kwon-Sam Park; Takahiro Ono; Takeshi Honda
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  Rapid and sensitive detection of Yersinia pestis using amplification of plague diagnostic bacteriophages monitored by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Kirill V Sergueev; Yunxiu He; Richard H Borschel; Mikeljon P Nikolich; Andrey A Filippov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification.

Authors:  Philip Jones; David Binns; Hsin-Yu Chang; Matthew Fraser; Weizhong Li; Craig McAnulla; Hamish McWilliam; John Maslen; Alex Mitchell; Gift Nuka; Sebastien Pesseat; Antony F Quinn; Amaia Sangrador-Vegas; Maxim Scheremetjew; Siew-Yit Yong; Rodrigo Lopez; Sarah Hunter
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database.

Authors:  Baofeng Jia; Amogelang R Raphenya; Brian Alcock; Nicholas Waglechner; Peiyao Guo; Kara K Tsang; Briony A Lago; Biren M Dave; Sheldon Pereira; Arjun N Sharma; Sachin Doshi; Mélanie Courtot; Raymond Lo; Laura E Williams; Jonathan G Frye; Tariq Elsayegh; Daim Sardar; Erin L Westman; Andrew C Pawlowski; Timothy A Johnson; Fiona S L Brinkman; Gerard D Wright; Andrew G McArthur
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  A Rapid Bacteriophage DNA Extraction Method.

Authors:  Džiuginta Jakočiūnė; Arshnee Moodley
Journal:  Methods Protoc       Date:  2018-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.