| Literature DB >> 35458282 |
Mohammad Reza Aghazadeh1,2,3, Sheyda Delfanian1, Pouria Aghakhani2,3, Shahin Homaeigohar4, Atefeh Alipour5, Hosein Shahsavarani2,3.
Abstract
In recent years, tissue engineering researchers have exploited a variety of biomaterials that can potentially mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM) for tissue regeneration. Natural cellulose, mainly obtained from bacterial (BC) and plant-based (PC) sources, can serve as a high-potential scaffold material for different regenerative purposes. Natural cellulose has drawn the attention of researchers due to its advantages over synthetic cellulose including its availability, cost effectiveness, perfusability, biocompatibility, negligible toxicity, mild immune response, and imitation of native tissues. In this article, we review recent in vivo and in vitro studies which aimed to assess the potential of natural cellulose for the purpose of soft (skin, heart, vein, nerve, etc.) and hard (bone and tooth) tissue engineering. Based on the current research progress report, it is sensible to conclude that this emerging field of study is yet to satisfy the clinical translation criteria, though reaching that level of application does not seem far-fetched.Entities:
Keywords: bone regeneration; cardiac regeneration; natural cellulose; neural regeneration; skin regeneration; tissue engineering; vascular regeneration
Year: 2022 PMID: 35458282 PMCID: PMC9030052 DOI: 10.3390/polym14081531
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1Scheme of the transformation cycle of cellulose crystals [12].
Figure 2Schematic illustration of the fabrication procedure of natural cellulosic scaffolds: 1. bacterial inoculation or plant decellularization; 2. purification and slicing; 3. chemical/physical modifications; 4. culturing cells on the surface of the scaffold (2D cell culture) or 3D cell culturing for in vitro assessments.
Figure 3(a) Projections of the cellulose I crystal packings. (b) Two single sheets of cellulose Iα and cellulose Iβ on the (100) and (110) crystallographic planes, respectively [22].
Some recent studies on natural cellulose scaffolds developed for bone tissue engineering.
| Cellulose Source | Bioscaffold Platform | Achieved Results | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BC | Three-dimensional macro/microporous-nanofibrous BC scaffold co-cultured with low-dose BMP-2-primed murine mesenchymal stem cells | Owing to the ECM-mimicking architecture, the scaffold provided an ideal environment for the proliferation, adhesion, and infiltration of osteoblast cells. | Dubey et al., 2021 [ |
| BC | Three-dimensional printed porous composite scaffolds based on polycaprolactone/gelatin/BC/hydroxyapatite | The composite scaffolds induced promising osteoblast cell viability and adhesion. The pore size of the scaffolds was ideal for bone tissue substitution. | Cakmak et al., 2020 |
| BC | Three-dimensional printed porous composite scaffolds composed of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/hexagonal boron nitride (hBN)/BC | The pore size and homogeneous structure of the scaffolds were desirable for bone tissue engineering. The addition of BC to the polymer blend resulted in a significant increase in human osteoblast cell viability. | Aki et al., 2020 |
| BC | Multistage structural 3D porous microsphere composed of collagen/BC/BMP-2 | The porous microspheres promoted osteoblast differentiation and thus can be used to repair injured bone tissues. | Zhang et al., 2020 |
| BC | BC-reinforced polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) scaffolds | PHB/BC scaffolds implanted in mice with a calvarial defect enhanced in vivo osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. | Codreanu et al., 2020 |
| BC | Antibacterial nanocomposite bioscaffolds based on BC/β-glucan incorporating hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (n-HAp) and graphene oxide (GO) | The antibacterial activity was proved by Gram staining. In vitro study using an osteoblast cell line revealed better biocompatibility and cell proliferation and adhesion due to the uniform distribution of the pore size, surface roughness, spongy morphology, and enhanced mechanical properties. | Khan, Haider et al., 2021 |
| BC | Nanocomposite scaffolds composed of BC, magnetite (Fe3O4), and hydroxyapatite (HA) | The supermagnetic nanocomposite scaffold exhibited a high porosity of 81.1% and mechanical properties similar to those of human cancellous/trabecular bone. Moreover, it supports osteoblast cell attachment and proliferation, making it a candidate for bone tissue engineering. | Torgbo et al., 2019 |
| BC | Fisetin-loaded BC scaffold | In vitro studies based on BM-MSCs showed no cytotoxicity and an increase in cell viability. The gene expression assay indicated the osteogenic potential of the fisetin-loaded BC scaffold. | Kheiry et al., 2018 |
| PC | Decellularized cabbage | On co-culturing BM-MSCs and the decellularized scaffold, the bone-related genes were significantly expressed, which is due to the rough surface and high specific surface area. | Salehi et al., 2021 |
| PC | Decellularized and oxidized bamboo stem | The hydrophilicity of the scaffold was increased by the oxidation process. Plus, in vitro studies validated the improved MSC viability, adhesion, and osteogenic differentiation with the oxidized decellularized plant scaffold compared to the control groups. | Mohan et al., 2021 |
| PC | Outermost skin of onion | The decellularized scaffold maintains a porous structure, moderate roughness, and a high tensile strength. The in vitro assessments proved the pro-osteogenic potential of the scaffold. | Salehi et al., 2021 |
| PC | Collagen-coated decellularized red apple | The decellularized scaffold possesses a high porosity. In vitro studies indicated a higher bone formation potential for the scaffold. | Latour et al., 2020 |
| PC | Decellularized spinach leaf | The surface topography and vasculature of the scaffold supported the attachment and proliferation of cultured BM-MSCs. The genes expressed during in vitro studies showed the pro-osteogenic nature of the scaffold due to its optimum surface composition, hydrophilicity, and high specific surface area. | Salehi et al., 2020 |
| PC | Decellularized apple, broccoli, sweet | In vivo studies on a rat calvarial defect model showed facilitated bone mineralization in the presence of the decellularized plant scaffold. | Lee et al., 2019 |
| PC | Poly-L-lysine-coated decellularized carrot | After plant decellularization, no cytotoxicity was shown in vitro. The decellularized plant-based scaffold supported MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblast cells’ adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation. | Contessi Negrini et al., 2020 |
Figure 4The camera images show the leaves of cabbage (Cb) (a) and decellularized Cb (b). (c,d) SEM images of decellularized Cb. (e,f) Cross-sectional SEM images of decellularized Cb. (g,h) SEM images of decellularized Cb cultured with BM-MSCs. (i) Cross-sectional SEM image of decellularized Cb cultured with BM-MSCs [32].
Figure 5SEM images of the onion skin before (a) and after decellularization (b,c). (d) Cross-sectional SEM image of the decellularized onion skin after decellularization. SEM images of the surface (e–g) and cross-section (h) of the decellularized onion skin after 18 days of BM-MSC culture (the arrows mark the adhesion points of the cells on the surface) [32].
Figure 6(a) Camera images of wound dressings made of BC, BC/PDA (BCP), and BC/PDA with 1% ε-PL and their corresponding SEM micrographs (note that the last (right) column contains SEM images of BCP@ɛ-PL dressings with higher additive concentrations). (b) In vivo wound healing potential of the BC and BCP@ ɛ-PL1&3 dressings compared to the control, imaged at different time points up to two weeks [48].
Figure 7(a,b) The camera image of a leaf before and after decellularization, respectively. (c) Immunofluorescence images of a stem and leaf after rhodamine water perfusion. (d) SEM images of PLGA-based rapamycin nanoparticles at different magnifications. (e) The solidified hydrogel [60].
Figure 8(a) Camera image of decellularized onion skin. (b) SEM images of onion skin before and after decellularization at different magnifications. (c) Microscale images of hematoxylin–eosin stained onion cellulosic fibers (d) SEM images of decellularized onion skin after being coated with rapamycin nanoparticles [60].