| Literature DB >> 35458239 |
Xiaoyuan Jin1, Ying Chen1, Rui Zhou1, Xiaole Jiang1, Boyan Chen1, Hao Chen1, Ying Li2, Zhi Chen3, Haihong Zhu3, Hongmei Wang1.
Abstract
For older adults, self-care begins with daily health behaviors (DHB), which refers to a series of basic behaviors beneficial to health in daily life; it is the foundation for promoting health, preventing disease, and maintaining health with or without the support of a healthcare provider. Thus, this study aimed to observe the changes in DHB among older adults when the COVID-19 pan-demic first erupted in China (at the beginning of 2020) and explore the impact factors on self-care routines in daily life. We applied a cross-sectional study among 1256 (83.7%) valid older Chinese from 19 February 2020 to 19 March 2020, the score of DHB changes (mean ± SD, 14.70 ± 2.140; range, 8-18) presented a significant growth (t1256 = 44.636, p < 0.001) during COVID-19. From 3 hierarchical linear regression models, the older Chinese who received a higher education include high school (β = 0.403, 95% CI [0.009, 0.797], p = 0.045) and college degree and above (β = 0.488, 95% CI [0.034, 0.943], p = 0.035), and lived in the eastern China (β = 0.771, 95% CI [0.392, 1.151], p < 0.001) took DHB more frequently. However, the high-risk infection (β = -0.740, 95% CI [-1.248, -0.231], p = 0.004), overweight/obese character (β = -0.265, 95% CI [-0.526, -0.004], p = 0.047), and alcohol consumption (β = -0.350, 95% CI [-0.634, -0.065], p = 0.016) are significant factors in decreasing a senior's DHB performance. For China, self-care offers a straightforward strategy among the range of measures required to combat COVID-19 and future health threats. In summary, findings in this study can build a foundation for developing healthcare policy and services for the relevant government and departments on prompting DHB and the importance of self-care among the older population.Entities:
Keywords: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); daily health behaviors (DHB); older Chinese; self-care
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35458239 PMCID: PMC9024498 DOI: 10.3390/nu14081678
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Univariate analysis of participants’ general information (socio-demographic characteristics, physical well-being, and self-assessment of health) on their DHB performance during the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 1256) a.
| Number (%) | DHB (Mean ± SD) 1 | t/F(df) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1256 (100) | 14.70 ± 2.140 | t(1256) = 44.636 |
|
|
| ||||
| Sex | t(1255) = 0.656 | 0.512 | ||
| Female | 693 (55.2) | 14.73 ± 2.152 | ||
| Male | 563 (44.8) | 14.65 ± 2.127 | ||
| Age groups (years) | F(2,1253) = 5.786 |
| ||
| 60~69 | 616 (49.0) | 14.86 ± 2.166 d | ||
| 70~79 | 509 (40.5) | 14.62 ± 2.114 d | ||
| ≥80 | 131 (10.4) | 14.20 ± 2.043 e | ||
| Marital Status | t(1255) = −3.449 |
| ||
| Married/cohabiting | 938 (74.7) | 14.82 ± 2.143 | ||
| Unmarried/divorced/separated/widowed | 318 (25.3) | 14.34 ± 2.097 | ||
| Education level | F(3,1252) = 9.608 |
| ||
| Primary school and below | 572 (45.5) | 14.39 ± 2.158 d | ||
| Middle School | 332 (26.4) | 14.76 ± 2.114 e | ||
| High school | 197 (15.7) | 15.06 ± 2.160 e,f | ||
| College or above | 155 (12.3) | 15.25 ± 1.919 f | ||
| Residence | t(1255)= −3.746 |
| ||
| Rural | 677 (53.9) | 14.48 ± 2.169 | ||
| Urban | 579 (46.1) | 14.95 ± 2.080 | ||
| Retired types b | F(2,1253) = 1.852 | 0.157 | ||
| Semi-retirement b1 | 69 (5.5) | 14.67 ± 2.254 | ||
| Retirement with honors b2 | 140 (11.1) | 14.37 ± 2.439 | ||
| Traditional retirement b3 | 1047 (83.4) | 14.74 ± 2.088 | ||
| Monthly household income (RMB) b | F(2,1253) = 4.431 |
| ||
| <600 | 212 (16.9) | 14.44 ± 2.279 d | ||
| 600~6000 | 842 (67.0) | 14.67 ± 2.138 d | ||
| >6000 | 202 (16.1) | 15.05 ± 1.955 e | ||
| Region of living c | F(2,1253) = 10.887 |
| ||
| Eastern | 622 (49.5%) | 14.94 ± 2.082 d | ||
| Central | 191 (15.2) | 14.77 ± 2.140 d | ||
| Western | 443 (35.3) | 14.33 ± 2.174 e | ||
| COVID-19 risk level (number of infected cases) c | F(2,1253) = 2.666 | 0.070 | ||
| Low-risk (<100) | 143 (11.4) | 14.83 ± 2.043 | ||
| Medium-risk (100~999) | 594 (47.3) | 14.55 ± 2.190 | ||
| High-risk (≥1000) | 519 (41.3) | 14.83 ± 2.102 | ||
|
| F(2,1253) = 3.848 |
| ||
| Classification of BMI (calculated BMI values) | ||||
| Underweight (<18.5) | 102 (8.1) | 14.29 ± 2.319 d | ||
| Normal weight (18.5~23.9) | 749 (59.6) | 14.82 ± 2.200 e | ||
| Overweight/obesity (≥24.0) | 405 (32.2) | 14.57 ± 1.960 d | ||
| Smoking | t(1255) = 2.278 |
| ||
| No (Never/Have quit smoking) | 1018 (81.1) | 14.76 ± 2.142 | ||
| Yes | 238 (18.9) | 14.41 ± 2.114 | ||
| Drinking | t(1255) = 2.403 |
| ||
| No (Never/Have quit drinking) | 852 (67.8) | 14.79 ± 2.178 | ||
| Yes | 404 (32.2) | 14.49 ± 2.046 | ||
| Chronic disease | F(2,1253) = 3.212 |
| ||
| No chronic disease | 258 (20.5) | 14.81 ± 2.098 d | ||
| 1–2 chronic disease(s) | 800 (63.7) | 14.74 ± 2.137 d | ||
| Multiple (3 or more) chronic diseases | 198 (15.8) | 14.35 ± 2.183 e | ||
|
| F(3,1252) = 2.897 |
| ||
| Poor | 44 (3.5) | 14.43 ± 2.182 d,e | ||
| Fair | 561 (44.7) | 14.52 ± 2.133 d | ||
| Good | 374 (29.8) | 14.81 ± 2.118 e | ||
| Very good /Excellent | 277 (22.1) | 14.93 ± 2.157 e |
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; BMI: body mass index; RMB: RenMingBi. a Of the 1256 participants involved in the current analysis, 722 (57.5%) completed the questionnaire with the help of others (proxy filling). b The covariates were designed to collect participants’ SES. b1 Semi-retirement: the older is leaving his/her chosen career but continuing to work afterward, usually with reduced and flexible hours that let them spend more time enjoying leisure activities [41]. b2 Retirement with honors: a unique type in China, which is for the older cadre who are civil servants working in the government, public institutions, and state-owned enterprises, or those who participated in the revolution before the National Day on 1 October 1949 (excluding the day of October 1) [44]. b3 Traditional retirement: for all the general older population, who have reached legal age, left their career, and never look back [41]. c The covariates were designed to collect participants’ living environments during the survey period. d,e,f There was a common superscript between the different strata groups under each dependent variable, and there was no statistical significance between them (p ≥ 0.05). 1 Changes in overall DHB performance: the total scores on 6 DHB categories range from 8 to 18 among 1256 participants. 2 Statistically significant associated factors are indicated in bold. 3 We applied a statistical analysis of one-sample t-test.
Changes on DHB performance among older Chinese in the past week (n = 1256).
| DHB Categories a | Frequency Changes (Percentage, %) b | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Decreased | No Change | Increased | |
| Opening the door/window to keep interactive ventilation c | 66 (5.3) | 243 (19.3) | 947 (75.4) |
| Washing hands c | 11 (0.9) | 227 (18.1) | 1018 (81.1) |
| Doing physical activities | 357 (28.4) | 438 (34.9) | 461 (36.7) |
| Eating vegetables and fruits (VF), and rich-protein diets c | 62 (4.9) | 523 (41.6) | 671 (53.4) |
| Taking vitamins/medical supplements | 99 (7.9) | 803 (63.9) | 354 (28.2) |
| Having a high-quality sleep with enough hours | 64 (5.1) | 598 (47.6) | 594 (47.3) |
| Changes in overall DHB (mean ± SD; Range) d | 14.70 ± 2.140; (8–18) | ||
a The particular DHB categories were involved according to the self-care pillars [22] of hygiene (general and personal), nutrition (type and quality of food eaten), lifestyle (sporting activities, leisure, etc.), and self-medication. b Ordinal variables; grading numerical value of each changing level (Decreased, No change, Increased) as points 1, 2, and 3 to one DHB category, respectively. c On the basis of ordinal recoding, the median of frequency changes for certain DHB is 3 points (increased). d Numerical variables; were calculated by adding the valued score of each participants’ self-reported frequency changes on taking six DHB categories week together, ranging from 8 to 18 among 1256 participants.
Associated factors * impacted DHB among older Chinese during the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 1256).
| Features | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | ||||
| Constants | 14.250 (13.512, 14.988) | <0.001 | 14.533 (13.751, 15.315) | <0.001 | 14.511 (13.481, 15.542) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||||
| Gender | ||||||
| Female | Raf a | Ref | Ref | |||
| Male | −0.127 (−0.367, 0.113) | 0.299 | 0.017 (−0.251, 0.285) | 0.903 | 0.012 (−0.256, 0.281) | 0.928 |
| Age groups (years) | ||||||
| 60~69 | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| 70~79 | −0.093 (−0.352, 0.165) | 0.478 | −0.048 (−0.309, 0.213) | 0.718 | −0.057 (−0.319, 0.205) | 0.669 |
| ≥80 |
|
| −0.366 (−0.785, 0.054) | 0.088 | −0.374 (−0.794, 0.046) | 0.081 |
| Marital Status | ||||||
| Unmarried/divorced/separated/widowed | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Married/cohabiting | 0.264 (−0.026, 0.555) | 0.075 | 0.231 (−0.059, 0.522) | 0.119 | 0.233 (−0.058, 0.524) | 0.116 |
| Education level | ||||||
| Primary school and below | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Middle School | 0.221 (−0.087, 0.529) | 0.159 | 0.184 (−0.124, 0.492) | 0.241 | 0.161 (−0.150, 0.471) | 0.310 |
| High school |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| College or above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Residence | ||||||
| Rural | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Urban | 0.066 (−0.223, 0.354) | 0.656 | 0.059 (−0.231, 0.349) | 0.689 | 0.066 (−0.224, 0.357) | 0.655 |
| Retired types | ||||||
| Semi-retirement | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Retirement with honors | 0.030 (−0.591, 0.651) | 0.924 | −0.042 (−0.666, 0.582) | 0.895 | 0.008 (−0.621, 0.637) | 0.980 |
| Traditional retirement | 0.208 (−0.316, 0.732) | 0.436 | 0.141 (−0.388, 0.669) | 0.601 | 0.179 (−0.353, 0.711) | 0.509 |
| Monthly household income (RMB) | ||||||
| <600 | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| 600–6000 | −0.059 (−0.396, 0.279) | 0.733 | −0.052 (−0.390, 0.287) | 0.765 | −0.058 (−0.398, 0.282) | 0.739 |
| >6000 | 0.092 (−0.367, 0.552) | 0.694 | 0.098 (−0.363, 0.558) | 0.677 | 0.062 (−0.403, 0.526) | 0.795 |
| Region of living | ||||||
| Western | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Eastern |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Central |
|
|
|
| 0.373 (−0.012, 0.759) | 0.057 |
| COVID-19 risk level (number of infected cases) | ||||||
| Low-risk (<100) | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Medium-risk (100~999) | −0.287 (−0.706, 0.132) | 0.179 | −0.363 (−0.785, 0.059) | 0.091 | −0.346 (−0.770, 0.077) | 0.109 |
| High-risk (≥1000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Classification of BMI (calculated BMI values) | ||||||
| Underweight (<18.5) | - b | - | Ref | Ref | ||
| Normal weight (18.5~23.9) | - | - | −0.420 (−0.863, 0.023) | 0.063 | −0.424 (−0.869, 0.020) | 0.061 |
| Overweight/obesity (≥24.0) | - | - |
|
|
|
|
| Smoking | ||||||
| No (Never/Have quit smoking) | - | - | Ref | Ref | ||
| Yes | - | - | −0.050 (−0.395, 0.295) | 0.776 | −0.040 (−0.385, 0.306) | 0.822 |
| Drinking | ||||||
| No (Never/Have quit drinking) | - | - | Ref | Ref | ||
| Yes | - | - |
|
|
|
|
| Chronic disease | ||||||
| No chronic disease | - | - | Ref | Ref | ||
| 1–2 chronic disease(s) | - | - | 0.075 (−0.225, 0.375) | 0.625 | 0.139 (−0.179, 0.457) | 0.391 |
| Multiple (3 or more) chronic diseases | - | - | −0.166 (−0.576, 0.245) | 0.429 | −0.073 (−0.515, 0.369) | 0.745 |
|
| ||||||
| Poor | - | - | - | - | Ref | |
| Fair | - | - | - | - | −0.152 (−0.807, 0.504) | 0.650 |
| Good | - | - | - | - | −0.016 (−0.697, 0.665) | 0.964 |
| Very good/Excellent | - | - | - | - | 0.068 (−0.640, 0.777) | 0.850 |
Abbreviations: 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; RMB: RenMingBi. * Statistically significant associations are indicated in bold. a Ref: reference group; b: Data was not involved in the model.