| Literature DB >> 35458219 |
Maximilien Franck1,2,3, Juan de Toro-Martín1,2,3, Thibault V Varin1,2,4, Véronique Garneau1,2,3, Geneviève Pilon1,2,4, Denis Roy1, Patrick Couture1,2,5, Charles Couillard1,2,3, André Marette1,2,4, Marie-Claude Vohl1,2,3.
Abstract
The aim of this exploratory study was to evaluate the gut microbial signatures of distinct trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) responses following raspberry consumption. Investigations were carried out in 24 subjects at risk of developing metabolic syndrome who received 280 g/day of frozen raspberries for 8 weeks. Blood and stool samples were collected at weeks 0 and 8. Inter-individual variability in plasma TMAO levels was analyzed, 7 subjects were excluded due to noninformative signals and 17 subjects were kept for analysis and further stratified according to their TMAO response. Whole-metagenome shotgun sequencing analysis was used to determine the impact of raspberry consumption on gut microbial composition. Before the intervention, the relative abundance of Actinobacteriota was significantly higher in participants whose TMAO levels increased after the intervention (p = 0.03). The delta TMAO (absolute differences of baseline and week 8 levels) was positively associated with the abundance of gut bacteria such as Bilophila wadsworthia (p = 0.02; r2 = 0.37), from the genus Granulicatella (p = 0.03; r2 = 0.48) or the Erysipelotrichia class (p = 0.03; r2 = 0.45). Changes in the gut microbial ecology induced by raspberry consumption over an 8-week period presumably impacted quaternary amines-utilizing activity and thus plasma TMAO levels.Entities:
Keywords: TMAO; gut microbiota; metabolic disorders; raspberry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35458219 PMCID: PMC9027468 DOI: 10.3390/nu14081656
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Individual plasma changes in TMAO levels after 8-week raspberry consumption. The y axis represents delta values in plasma TMAO in pre- versus post-Rb consumption. Each bar on the x axis represents one participant. DEC (red bars) and INC (blue bars) stand for TMAO decrease and TMAO increase subgroups, respectively.
Clinical characteristics of study participants at week 0 according to TMAO subgroups.
| Variable | N | DEC | N | INC | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (men/women) | 6 | 3/3 | 11 | 4/7 | 0.58 | ||||
| Age (years) | 6 | 29.3 | ± | 8.1 | 11 | 34.3 | ± | 11.5 | 0.78 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 6 | 30.5 | ± | 3.7 | 11 | 30.0 | ± | 5.9 | 0.89 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 6 | 98.2 | ± | 17.5 | 11 | 98.7 | ± | 12.7 | 0.53 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 6 | 118.4 | ± | 4.6 | 11 | 112.5 | ± | 13.8 | 0.92 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 6 | 75.9 | ± | 8.8 | 11 | 72.1 | ± | 9.5 | 0.89 |
| Total-C (mmol/L) | 6 | 5.11 | ± | 0.93 | 11 | 4.43 | ± | 0.84 | 0.21 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 6 | 1.23 | ± | 0.59 | 11 | 1.34 | ± | 0.36 | 0.88 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 6 | 3.13 | ± | 0.93 | 11 | 2.38 | ± | 0.81 | 0.19 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 6 | 1.63 | ± | 0.86 | 11 | 1.56 | ± | 0.96 | 0.92 |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 5 | 5.54 | ± | 0.83 | 11 | 4.96 | ± | 0.43 | 0.21 |
| Fasting insulin (pmol/L) | 6 | 84.33 | ± | 55.52 | 9 | 90.67 | ± | 40.61 | 0.42 |
| HbA1C (%) | 6 | 5.05 | ± | 0.33 | 11 | 5.05 | ± | 0.31 | 0.77 |
| LBP (μg/mL) | 6 | 4.86 | ± | 0.67 | 11 | 5.49 | ± | 0.92 | 0.24 |
| LPS (pg/mL) | 6 | 76.02 | ± | 19.87 | 11 | 87.09 | ± | 19.63 | 0.33 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 6 | 2.30 | ± | 2.07 | 10 | 1.81 | ± | 1.10 | 0.57 |
Data are presented as raw means ± standard deviations. p-values are from Fisher’s exact test (sex) and general linear models adjusted for BMI, sex and age. Statistical significance was considered at p ≤ 0.05. BMI, body mass index. SBP, systolic blood pressure. DBP, diastolic blood pressure. Total-C, total cholesterol. HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. TG, triglycerides. HbA1C, glycated hemoglobin. CRP, C-reactive protein. LBP, lipopolysaccharide -binding protein. LPS, lipopolysaccharide. DEC and INC stand for TMAO decrease and TMAO increase subgroups, respectively.
Longitudinal changes between week 0 and week 8 in clinical characteristics of participants according to TMAO subgroups.
| DEC | INC | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | N | Week 0 | N | Week 8 | N | Week 0 | N | Week 8 | Group | Visit | Int | ||||||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 6 | 30.5 | ± | 3.7 | 6 | 30.4 | ± | 3.9 | 11 | 30.0 | ± | 5.9 | 11 | 30.2 | ± | 6.1 | 0.56 | 0.76 | 0.51 |
| Waist circ (cm) | 6 | 98.2 | ± | 17.5 | 6 | 98.7 | ± | 12.7 | 11 | 98.7 | ± | 12.7 | 11 | 99.1 | ± | 13.2 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.48 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 6 | 118.4 a | ± | 4.6 | 6 | 116.1 b | ± | 6.9 | 11 | 112.5 a | ± | 13.8 | 11 | 109.8 b | ± | 13.7 | 0.89 |
| 0.84 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 6 | 75.9 | ± | 8.8 | 6 | 72.6 | ± | 6.1 | 11 | 72.1 | ± | 9.5 | 11 | 70.1 | ± | 11.3 | 0.36 | 0.08 | 0.48 |
| Total-C (mmol/L) | 6 | 5.11 | ± | 0.93 | 6 | 4.99 | ± | 0.95 | 11 | 4.43 | ± | 0.84 | 11 | 4.20 | ± | 0.69 | 0.31 | 0.21 | 0.69 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 6 | 1.23 | ± | 0.59 | 6 | 1.20 | ± | 0.52 | 11 | 1.34 | ± | 0.36 | 11 | 1.31 | ± | 0.24 | 0.92 | 0.57 | 0.97 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 6 | 3.13 | ± | 0.93 | 6 | 3.08 | ± | 0.90 | 11 | 2.38 | ± | 0.81 | 11 | 2.33 | ± | 0.66 | 0.45 | 0.68 | 0.99 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 6 | 1.63 | ± | 0.86 | 6 | 1.54 | ± | 0.93 | 11 | 1.56 | ± | 0.96 | 11 | 1.21 | ± | 0.49 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.54 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 5 | 5.54 a | ± | 0.83 | 6 | 5.10 b | ± | 0.72 | 11 | 4.96 | ± | 0.43 | 11 | 4.95 | ± | 0.55 | 0.80 |
| 0.15 |
| Insulin (pmol/L) | 6 | 84.33 | ± | 55.52 | 5 | 71.60 | ± | 26.99 | 9 | 90.67 | ± | 40.61 | 10 | 103.70 | ± | 64.42 | 0.63 | 0.49 | 0.79 |
| HbA1C (%) | 6 | 5.05 | ± | 0.33 | 6 | 5.09 | ± | 0.29 | 11 | 5.05 | ± | 0.31 | 11 | 5.12 | ± | 0.28 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 6 | 2.30 | ± | 2.07 | 6 | 3.40 | ± | 2.57 | 10 | 1.81 | ± | 1.10 | 10 | 2.30 | ± | 1.90 | 0.38 | 0.05 | 0.42 |
| LBP (μg/mL) | 6 | 4.86 | ± | 0.67 | 6 | 5.53 | ± | 1.47 | 11 | 5.49 | ± | 0.92 | 11 | 5.27 | ± | 0.89 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.11 |
| LPS (pg/mL) | 6 | 76.02 | ± | 19.87 | 6 | 71.63 | ± | 29.83 | 11 | 87.09 | ± | 19.63 | 11 | 85.10 | ± | 21.37 | 0.95 | 0.39 | 0.74 |
Data are presented as raw means ± standard deviations. p-values are from linear mixed models adjusted for BMI, sex, age and baseline levels. Statistical significance was considered at p ≤ 0.05 for the effects of group, visit and the interaction group by visit (Int). BMI, body mass index. SBP, systolic blood pressure. DBP, diastolic blood pressure. Total-C, total cholesterol. HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. TG, triglycerides. HbA1C, glycated hemoglobin. CRP, C-reactive protein. LBP, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein. LPS, lipopolysaccharide. Glucose and insulin are fasting levels. Significant p-values are highlighted in bold. Letters stand for significant differences (a, b for visit differences). DEC and INC stand for TMAO decrease and TMAO increase subgroups, respectively.
Figure 2Composition of fecal microbiota according to TMAO subgroups. (A). α-diversity between TMAO subgroups according to Shannon (left) and Simpson’s reciprocal (right) indexes. Each participant is represented by a point. (B). Relative abundance of phyla among TMAO subgroups before and after Rb consumption. DEC and INC stand for TMAO decrease and TMAO increase subgroups, respectively. Asterisk stands for significant differences in INC versus DEC group at week 0.
Figure 3Differential abundance of fecal microbiota according to TMAO subgroups at the species level. Each bacterial species is represented by a point, and each color represents a different phylum. (A,B). Change in the abundance of bacterial species between weeks 0 and 8 in INC and DEC subgroups. (C). Differential change in the abundance of bacterial species between INC and DEC subgroups during the intervention. (D). Change in the abundance of bacterial species between CT and Rb groups, irrespective of the time. (E,F). Change in the abundance of bacterial species between CT and Rb groups at weeks 0 and 8, respectively. DEC and INC stand for TMAO decrease and increase subgroups, respectively. W0 and W8 stand for week 0 (baseline) and week 8 (end of the intervention). Asterisks and hashtags stand for significant differences between INC and DEC subgroups at nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR-adjusted p-value < 0.05, respectively.
Association between fecal microbial abundance at the species level and plasma TMAO levels throughout the intervention.
| Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus | Species | β-Value | r2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actinobacteriota | Actinobacteria | Actinomycetales | Actinomycetaceae | Actinomyces | Actinomyces odontolyticus | 9.5 | 0.02 | 0.62 |
| Actinobacteriota | Actinobacteria | Coriobacteriales | Coriobacteriaceae | Collinsella | Collinsella aerofaciens | −0.3 | 0.03 | 0.42 |
| Actinobacteriota | Actinobacteria | Actinomycetales | Micrococcaceae | Rothia | Rothia mucilaginosa | 9.5 | 0.01 | 0.52 |
| Bacteroidota | Bacteroidia | Bacteroidales | Bacteroidaceae | Bacteroides | Bacteroides nordii | 5.2 | 0.04 | 0.82 |
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | Anaerotruncus | Anaerotruncus colihominis | 9.1 | 0.02 | 0.53 |
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae | Blautia | Blautia hydrogenotrophica | 20.0 | 0.02 | 0.71 |
| Firmicutes | Erysipelotrichia | Erysipelotrichales | Erysipelotrichaceae | Erysipelotrichaceae | Erysipelotrichaceae bacterium 21 3 | 12.6 | 0.03 | 0.45 |
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Clostridiales | Flavonifractor | Flavonifractor plautii | 9.7 | 0.03 | 0.36 |
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Carnobacteriaceae | Granulicatella | Granulicatella unclassified | 13.0 | 0.03 | 0.48 |
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | Ruminococcus | Ruminococcus callidus | 1.8 | 0.02 | 0.79 |
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Streptococcaceae | Streptococcus | Streptococcus infantis | 9.7 | 0.02 | 0.55 |
| Proteobacteria | Deltaproteobacteria | Desulfovibrionales | Desulfovibrionaceae | Bilophila | Bilophila wadsworthia | 17.9 | 0.02 | 0.37 |
Significant associations are from linear regression analysis (p-value < 0.05). β-value represents the direction of the association (positive or negative). r2 represents the determination coefficient of TMAO changes to the bacterial modulation; a larger value of r2 indicates a greater influence of TMAO changes on the bacterial modulation.
Association between fecal microbial abundance at the species level and plasma LBP levels throughout the intervention.
| Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus | Species | β-Value | r2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actinobacteriota | Actinobacteria | Coriobacteriales | Coriobacteriaceae | Adlercreutzia | Adlercreutzia equolifaciens | −11.0 | 0.02 | 0.25 |
| Bacteroidota | Bacteroidia | Bacteroidales | Rikenellaceae | Alistipes | Alistipes finegoldii | −2.4 | 0.04 | 0.22 |
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Carnobacteriaceae | Granulicatella | Granulicatella unclassified | −14.4 | 0.04 | 0.32 |
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Streptococcaceae | Streptococcus | Streptococcus australis | −19.8 | 0.04 | 0.31 |
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Streptococcaceae | Streptococcus | Streptococcus infantis | −17.6 | 0.05 | 0.34 |
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Streptococcaceae | Streptococcus | Streptococcus mitis oralis pneumoniae | −17.6 | 0.05 | 0.31 |
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Clostridiaceae | Clostridium | Clostridium citroniae | −15.0 | 0.01 | 0.39 |
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Clostridiaceae | Clostridium | Clostridium hathewayi | −10.6 | 0.01 | 0.41 |
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Clostridiales | Clostridiales | Clostridiales bacterium 1 7 47FAA | −14.9 | 0.03 | 0.41 |
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Clostridiales | Flavonifractor | Flavonifractor plautii | −9.0 | 0.04 | 0.28 |
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae | Lachnospiraceae | Lachnospiraceae bacterium 7 1 58FAA | −8.1 | 0.03 | 0.21 |
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | Anaerotruncus | Anaerotruncus colihominis | −16.4 | 0.05 | 0.32 |
| Firmicutes | Erysipelotrichia | Erysipelotrichales | Erysipelotrichaceae | Erysipelotrichaceae | Erysipelotrichaceae bacterium 6 1 45 | −17.5 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Firmicutes | Erysipelotrichia | Erysipelotrichales | Erysipelotrichaceae | Holdemania | Holdemania filiformis | −14.1 | 0.04 | 0.27 |
| Proteobacteria | Deltaproteobacteria | Desulfovibrionales | Desulfovibrionaceae | Bilophila | Bilophila wadsworthia | −14.0 | 0.02 | 0.29 |
| Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Escherichia | Escherichia coli | −4.4 | 0.01 | 0.55 |
| Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Escherichia | Escherichia unclassified | −7.8 | 0.03 | 0.53 |
Significant associations are from linear regression analysis (p-value < 0.05). β-value represents the direction of the association (positive or negative). r2 represents the determination coefficient of LBP changes to the bacterial modulation; a larger value of r2 indicates a greater influence of LBP changes on the bacterial modulation.
Figure 4Association of fecal microbial abundance with plasma TMAO and LBP levels. The top five associations between fecal microbial abundance at the species level with TMAO and LBP plasma levels throughout the intervention (delta values) are shown in panels (A,B), respectively.
Figure 5Relative abundance of the functional pathways of 12 fecal bacterial species associated with TMAO levels according to TMAO response subgroups. p-values were obtained using linear mixed models. Asterisks stand for significant differences in INC versus DEC groups either at week 0 or week 8.