| Literature DB >> 35458174 |
Parag Palit1, Md Amran Gazi1, Subhasish Das1, Md Mehedi Hasan1, Zannatun Noor2, Jafrin Ferdous1, Md Ashraful Alam1, Sharika Nuzhat1, Md Ridwan Islam1, Mustafa Mahfuz1,3, Rashidul Haque2, Tahmeed Ahmed1,4.
Abstract
Dysregulations in the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway are associated with several human anomalies. We aimed to elucidate possible implications for potential aberrations in the mTOR pathway with childhood malnutrition. We analyzed the activity of phospho-mTORC1 and the expressions of several mTOR pathway genes, namely: MTOR, TSC1, LAMTOR2, RPS6K1 and RICTOR from peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from venous blood of children suffering from different forms of malnutrition and compared them with those from healthy children. Significant reduction in the phosphorylation of mTORC1 was noted, as well as a decrease in expression of LAMTOR2 gene and increase in TSC1 gene expression were observed between malnourished children in comparison to the healthy children. The deregulation in the activity of the TSC1 and LAMTOR2 gene was significantly associated with all forms of childhood malnutrition. Our findings provide key insights into possible down-modulation in the overall activity of the mTOR pathway in childhood malnutrition. Further studies focusing on the analysis of a multitude of components involved in the mTOR pathway both at the gene and protein expression levels are required for conclusive evidence for the aforementioned proposition.Entities:
Keywords: childhood malnutrition; gene expression; mTOR pathway
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35458174 PMCID: PMC9031007 DOI: 10.3390/nu14081612
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Flow chart showing the inclusion of the participants in the study.
Socio-demographic, anthropometric and nutritional data collected from the study participants, distributed across the four study arms.
| Characteristics | Stunted | At Risk of Stunting | SAM | Healthy Control |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age in months | 12 (10, 14) | 12 (8.5, 15.5) | 11 (9, 13) | 12 (9.5, 14.5) |
| Male sex, | 16 (51.6%) | 20 (64.5%) | 19 (61.3%) | 16 (51.6%) |
| Weight in kg | 7.2 (6.8, 7.6) | 8.15 (7.7, 8.6) | 6.51 (6.2, 6.8) | 9.82 (8.9, 10.7) |
| Length in cm | 69.5 (67.2, 71.8) | 70.3 (66.6, 74) | 71.3 (69.4, 73.3) | 75.4 (72.5, 78.2) |
| Mid Upper Arm Circumference in cm | 135 (128, 142) | 141.5 (136, 147) | 120 (118, 123) | 150 (144, 156) |
| Head circumference in cm | 43.5 (43, 44) | 44.5 (43.3, 45.7) | 44 (42.5, 45.5) | 44.8 (44, 45.6) |
| Birth weight in kg | 2.5 (2.25, 2.75) | 3 (2.55, 3.45) | 2.8 (2.55, 3.05) | 3.1 (2.70, 3.50) |
| Weight for age Z score | −2.42 | −1.17 (−1.44, −0.9) | −3.75 (−4, −3.54) | 0.5 (−0.2, 1.2) |
| Length for age Z score | −2.35 (−2.6, −2.1) | −1.62 (−1.8, −1.44) | −2.46 | −0.22 (−0.76, 0.30) |
| Weight for length Z score | −1.57 | −0.45 | −3.66 | 0.36 (−0.44, 1.16) |
| Gestational age in weeks | 38 (36.8, 39.3) | 39 (38.5, 39.5) | 38 (37, 39) | 39 (38, 40) |
| Maternal age in years | 23 (19.3, 26.8) | 22.5 (17, 28) | 25 (20, 30) | 24.5 (22.4, 26.6) |
| Duration of EBF in months | 3 (0, 6) | 1 (0, 3.75) | 3 (0, 6) | 3 (0, 6) |
| Currently breastfeeding, | 28 (90.3%) | 29 (93.6%) | 22 (71%) | 29 (93.6%) |
| Currently formula feeding, | 15 (48.4%) | 16 (51.6%) | 29 (93.6%) | 19 (61.3%) |
| Currently fed with rice powder or suji, | 14 (45.2%) | 16 (51.6%) | 28 (90.3%) | 14 (45.2%) |
| Currently fed with cow milk, | 9 (29%) | 8 (25.8%) | 17 (54.8%) | 6 (19.4%) |
| Peripheral blood mononuclear cell count, million cells/ml | 4 (2.6, 5.3) | 4.35 (1.65, 5.7) | 4.75 (3.85, 5.65) | 4.33 (2.83, 5.83) |
Figure 2Comparison of the activity of phospho-mTORC1 (as expressed by the OD for phospho-mTORC1 at 450 nm) for each of the malnourished study arms (stunted, at risk of stunting and SAM) with that of the healthy control group. The p-value shown is the result of the Mann–Whitney U test comparing the median OD value for p-MTORC1 of each of the malnourished groups (stunted, at risk of stunting, SAM) with that of the healthy control group. The colored dots represent the individual OD values for p-mTORC1 at 450 nm.
Figure 3Statistical correlations between activity of p-mTORC1 with the anthropometric indices of LAZ, WAZ and WLZ. Correlation coefficient and the p-value shown is the result of Spearman-Rank Correlation between the activity of p-mTORC1 with each of the anthropometric indices. The colored circles indicate the individual activity of p-mTORC1 for the respective anthropometric indices of the study participants.
Comparison of the expression of the selected mTOR pathway genes (MTOR, TSC1, LAMTOR2, RPS6K1 and RICTOR) between each of the three malnourished cohorts with the healthy control group.
| Expression of mTOR Pathway Gene, 2−∆∆Ct | Stunted | At Risk of Stunting | SAM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stunted | Healthy Control | At Risk of Stunting | Healthy Control | SAM | Healthy Control | ||||
|
| 0.701 | 0.882 | 0.032 | 0.549 | 0.882 | 0.001 | 0.748 | 0.882 | 0.088 |
|
| 1.822 | 0.972 | 0.016 | 3.331 | 0.972 | 0.001 | 2.062 | 0.972 | 0.002 |
|
| 0.688 | 0.991 | 0.003 | 0.823 | 0.991 | 0.037 | 0.627 | 0.991 | 0.007 |
|
| 1.162 | 0.904 | 0.128 | 0.968 | 0.904 | 0.977 | 1.289 | 0.904 | 0.438 |
|
| 0.731 | 0.869 | 0.109 | 0.473 | 0.869 | 0.013 | 0.854 | 0.869 | 0.603 |
Footnotes: p-values are the result of Mann–Whitney U test conducted to compare the gene expression between each malnourished group with that of the healthy control group.
Figure 4Statistically significant correlations between the expressions of the selected mTOR pathway genes and the anthropometric indices of the study participants. Correlation coefficient and the p-value shown are results of Spearman Rank Correlation between the log of expression of the mTOR pathway genes with the anthropometric indices. The colored circles indicate the individual gene expressions for the respective anthropometric indices of the study participants.
Association of the analyzed mTOR pathway components with the different forms of childhood malnutrition; results from multivariate logistic regression analysis.
| mTOR Pathway Components Analyzed | Stunted vs. Healthy Control | At Risk of Stunting vs. Healthy Control | SAM vs. Healthy Control | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds Ratio (95% CI) | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | ||||
| phospho-mTORC1 | 0.102 (0.02–0.803) | 0.042 | 0.063 (0.02–2.162) | 0.801 | 0.202 (0.012–0.822) | 0.043 |
| 0.377 (0.102–1.453) | 0.161 | 0.153 (0.042–0.639) | 0.011 | 0.203 (0.041–1.073) | 0.060 | |
| 1.622 (1.041–2.513) | 0.031 | 2.509 (1.261–5.011) | 0.009 | 3.151 (0.788–12.511) | 0.012 | |
| 0.111 (0.023–0.494) | 0.042 | 0.188 (0.061–0.612) | 0.006 | 0.204 (0.042–0.974) | 0.046 | |
| 1.012 (0.968–1.048) | 0.686 | 0.992 (0.943–1.054) | 0.831 | 0.981 (0.842–1.134) | 0.763 | |
| 1.063 (0.881–1.282) | 0.528 | 0.788 (0.517–1.223) | 0.289 | 0.514 (0.191–1.412) | 0.204 | |
Potential confounders and covariates adjusted in the final regression model included: age, sex, RNA concentration, PBMC count, duration of exclusive breast feeding, current feeding practices (breastfeeding, formula feeding, feeding with rice powder/suji and feeding with cow/goat’s milk), paternal age (for stunted group), maternal age (for stunted group) and maternal occupation (for at risk of stunting group).