| Literature DB >> 35458065 |
Navaneethakrishnan Gopal1, Parameswaran Palaniyandi1, Palanisamy Ramasamy2, Hitesh Panchal3, Ahmed Mohamed Mahmoud Ibrahim4, Mohammad S Alsoufi5, Ammar H Elsheikh6.
Abstract
According to the modern era, zinc is one of the best replacements for human bio-implants due to its acceptable degradation, nominal degradable rate, and biocompatibility. However, alloying zinc with other nutrient metals is mandatory to improve the mechanical properties. In this research, Zn-4Ti-4Cu was alloyed with calcium and phosphorous through a powder metallurgical process to make guided bone regeneration (GBR). First, the sintering temperature of the alloy was found with the usage of thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Tensile and compression tests showed the suitability of the alloy in strength. The microstructural characteristics were provided with EDS and SEM. The different phases of the alloy were detected with X-ray diffraction (XRD). We can clearly depict the precipitates formed and the strengthening mechanism due to titanium addition. An electrochemical corrosion (ECM) test was carried out with simulated body fluid (Hank's solution) as the electrolyte. Cytotoxicity, biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and corrosion resistance properties were studied and discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Zn-Ti; biodegradation; cell viability; corrosion; cytocompatibility; microstructure
Year: 2022 PMID: 35458065 PMCID: PMC9030046 DOI: 10.3390/nano12081357
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Chemical composition in weight percentage.
| S.NO | Cu | Ti | P | Ca | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 86 |
Figure 1Thermogravimetric analysis of biodegradable Zn alloy.
Figure 2SEM image of the biodegradable zinc alloy (a) 200 µm and (b) 100 µm.
Figure 3XRD: biodegradable zinc alloy.
Figure 4Chemical composition by EDS.
Figure 5EDS: elemental mapping (a) Copper (b) Phosphorus (c) Calcium.
Chemical composition of Zn-Ti-Cu-Ca-P alloy by EDS.
| Element Line | Weight % | Weight % Error | Atom % |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3.86 | +/−0.10 | 7.5 |
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
| 4.39 | +/−0.07 | 6.58 |
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
| 3.94 | +/−0.16 | 4.95 |
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
| 5.64 | +/−0.66 | 5.34 |
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
| 82.18 | +/−1.45 | 75.63 |
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
| 100 | 100 |
Figure 6Polarization curve.
Cell viability OD value at 570 nm; control mean OD value: 0.428.
| S. No | Tested Sample Concentration (μg/mL) | OD Value at 570 nm | Cell Viability (%) | Mean Value (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Control | 0.424 | 0.432 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 2 | 24 h | 0.416 | 0.408 | 97.19 | 95.32 | 92.25 |
| 3 | 48 h | 0.418 | 0.422 | 95.66 | 98.59 | 97.12 |
| 4 | 72 h | 0.429 | 0.436 | 100.23 | 101.86 | 101.04 |
Figure 7Cell viability–Vero cell line.
Figure 8Corroded areas showing many pits.
Figure 9Cell growth and proliferation (a) controlled (b) treated with ZCC.
Figure 10(a) controlled, (b) ZCC treated cells—24 h, (c) ZCC treated cells—48 h.