| Literature DB >> 35457770 |
Xin Shen1, Xun Cao1, Sonia Sadeghian Esfahani2, Tayyaba Saleem1.
Abstract
Following the detection of COVID-19 in cold chain aquatic products (CCAP) at Xinfadi Produce Wholesale Market in Beijing, China, in June 2020, novel coronavirus positive tests of CCAP have been reported in such markets of Dalian, Xi'an, Qingdao, Taiyuan, and other places, which has aroused the concern of Chinese consumers. The CCAP outbreak puts tremendous pressure on public health management and threatens customer well-being. This article uses the theoretical model of planned behavior (TPB) to investigate Chinese consumers' purchasing intentions of CCAP under this circumstance. A total of 783 questionnaires were administered in China with empirical analysis through a structural equation model. The results show that attitudes (ATT) towards the safety of CCAP and subjective norms (SN) have significant positive effects on customers' purchasing behavior intention (BI); the emotional response to the health concern (EM) of CCAP has a significant positive impact on SN, ATT, and BI; and BI of CCAP is significantly affected by individual characteristics. The BI of CCAP for those married consumers living in cities and towns with a low monthly consumption frequency is more likely to be affected by the new coronavirus epidemic events. This paper is one of the first studies that contribute to the literature by exploring the influencing factors of the consumption behavior intention over the COVID-19 pandemic in China from a public health perspective. The findings provide significant implications for cold chain operators, market managers, and policymakers to develop guidelines and offer a framework to initiate and support the produce market and boost consumer health confidence in CCAP at the practitioner level.Entities:
Keywords: cold chain aquatic products; health concern; structural equation model; the theory of planned behavior
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35457770 PMCID: PMC9032540 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19084903
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1The theoretical model of consumers’ CCAP purchase intentions.
Measurement variables and sources.
| Variable | Index | Items 1 | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attitude (ATT) | ATT1 | Acknowledge that the epidemic is a factor in the safety of CCAP | (Ajzen and Kruglanskis [ |
| ATT2 | Acknowledge that the epidemic has caused people to lack confidence in the safety of domestic CCAP | ||
| ATT3 | Acknowledge that the epidemic has caused people to lack confidence in the safety of foreign CCAP | ||
| Subjective norms (SN) | SN1 | The opinions of my family will affect my purchase of CCAP | (Ajzen [ |
| SN2 | The opinions of colleagues and friends will affect my purchase of CCAP | ||
| SN3 | Reports from the official media will affect my purchase of CCAP | ||
| SN4 | Traditional media reports will affect my purchase of CCAP | ||
| SN5 | New media reports will affect my purchase of CCAP | ||
| Perceived behavior control (PBC) | PBC1 | Be sure to take personal protection when entering the aquatic product wholesale market | (Ajzen [ |
| PBC2 | Be sure to take personal protection when entering a supermarket | ||
| PBC3 | Be sure to take personal protection when entering the community | ||
| PBC4 | Be sure to take personal protection when buying CCAP online and receiving goods | ||
| PBC5 | Be sure to take personal protection when handling aquatic products | ||
| Emotional response (EM) | EM1 | Shocked by the CCAP epidemic | (Jain et al. [ |
| EM2 | In the future, we will focus on the health impact of the CCAP outbreak | ||
| EM3 | Concerns about the spread of the outbreak in the cold chain fish market and the health implications | ||
| Purchase intention (BI) | BI1 | The next month will reduce the consumption of CCAP | (Ajzen [ |
| BI2 | The consumption of CCAP will be reduced in the next 3 months | ||
| BI3 | The consumption of CCAP will be reduced in the next 6 months | ||
| BI4 | If the consumption of CCAP is reduced, the consumption of aquatic products will be reduced | ||
| BI5 | If the consumption of CCAP is reduced, the consumption of freshwater products will be reduced |
1 The items are deleted and revised from the original research version.
Basic statistical characteristics of respondents.
| Variable | Index | Quantity | Proportion | Variable | Index | Quantity | Proportion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 369 | 47.13% | Regional distribution | North-east | 112 | 14.30% |
| Female | 414 | 52.87% | North China | 134 | 17.11% | ||
| Age | 18~25 | 202 | 25.80% | East China | 302 | 38.57% | |
| 26~40 | 338 | 43.17% | Northwest | 52 | 6.64% | ||
| 41~60 | 233 | 29.76% | Southwest | 41 | 5.24% | ||
| Over 60 | 10 | 1.27% | Central South | 142 | 18.14% | ||
| Marriage | Married | 510 | 65.13% | Average monthly income in the past year (yuan) | 1000 and below | 25 | 3.19% |
| Unmarried | 273 | 34.87% | 1001~3000 | 68 | 8.69% | ||
| Have children | Yes | 495 | 63.22% | 3001~6000 | 174 | 22.22% | |
| No | 288 | 36.78% | 6001~9000 | 127 | 16.22% | ||
| Urban–rural distribution | City | 641 | 81.86% | 9001~15,000 | 160 | 20.43% | |
| Rural | 142 | 18.14% | Over 15,001 | 229 | 29.25% |
Confirmatory factor analysis of variables.
| Latent Variable | Observed Variable | Factor Loading | Cronbach’s Alpha | CR | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATT | ATT1 | 0.851 | 0.763 | 0.864 | 0.679 |
| ATT2 | 0.858 | ||||
| ATT3 | 0.760 | ||||
| SN | SN1 | 0.824 | 0.919 | 0.939 | 0.755 |
| SN2 | 0.842 | ||||
| SN3 | 0.883 | ||||
| SN4 | 0.914 | ||||
| SN5 | 0.879 | ||||
| PBC | PBC1 | 0.864 | 0.923 | 0.938 | 0.751 |
| PBC2 | 0.847 | ||||
| PBC3 | 0.879 | ||||
| PBC4 | 0.830 | ||||
| PBC5 | 0.909 | ||||
| EM | EM1 | 0.820 | 0.625 | 0.787 | 0.608 |
| EM2 | 0.586 | ||||
| EM3 | 0.811 | ||||
| BI | BI1 | 0.926 | 0.912 | 0.936 | 0.749 |
| BI2 | 0.948 | ||||
| BI3 | 0.935 | ||||
| BI4 | 0.848 | ||||
| BI5 | 0.631 |
Note: ATT = attitude; SN = subjective norms; PBC = perceived behavior control; EM = emotional response; and BI = purchase behavior intention.
Discriminant validity test.
| ATT | BI | EM | PBC | SN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATT | 0.679 | ||||
| BI | 0.364 | 0.749 | |||
| EM | 0.194 | 0.319 | 0.608 | ||
| PBC | 0.065 | 0.021 | 0.001 | 0.751 | |
| SN | 0.268 | 0.332 | 0.250 | 0.021 | 0.755 |
Note 1: The value on the diagonal is the average variance extraction, and the value below the diagonal is the square of the correlation coefficient between the latent variables. Note 2: ATT = attitude; SN = subjective norms; PBC = perceived behavior control; EM = emotional response; and BI = purchase behavior intention.
Model path coefficient and hypothesis testing results.
| Path | Path Coefficient | T Statistics | Hypothesis | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATT -> BI | 0.342 *** | 9.614 | 0.000 | H1 | Supported |
| SN -> BI | 0.253 *** | 6.588 | 0.000 | H2 | Supported |
| PBC -> BI | −0.014 | 0.489 | 0.632 | H3 | Refused |
| EM -> ATT | 0.440 *** | 13.525 | 0.000 | H4 | Supported |
| EM -> SN | 0.500 *** | 16.990 | 0.000 | H5 | Supported |
| EM -> PBC | −0.026 | 0.385 | 0.700 | H6 | Refused |
| EM -> BI | 0.287 *** | 8.306 | 0.000 | H7 | Supported |
Note 1: *** p < 0.001. Note 2: ATT = attitude; SN = subjective norms; PBC = perceived behavior control; EM = emotional response; and BI = purchase behavior intention.
Mediation effects testing results.
| Independent Variable | Mediating Variable | Dependent Variable | Direct Effect | Indirect Effect | Overall Effect | VAF | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H8a | EM | ATT | BI | 0.287 *** | 0.151 *** | 0.438 | 34.47% | Supported |
| H8b | EM | SN | BI | 0.287 *** | 0.127 *** | 0.414 | 30.68% | Supported |
Note 1: *** p < 0.001. The value in () is the T value. Note 2: ATT = attitude; SN = subjective norms; EM = emotional response; and BI = purchase behavior intention.
Table of estimated parameters for grouping tests of different regulatory variables.
| Gender (H9) | Marriage (H10) | Age (H11) | Residence (H12) | Frequency (H13) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Yes | No | Youth | Middle | Urban | Rural | Low | High | |
| H1 | 0.28 *** | 0.41 *** | 0.35 *** | 0.31 *** | 0.41 *** | 0.31 *** | 0.35 *** | 0.34 *** | 0.35 *** | 0.26 ** |
| H2 | 0.29 *** | 0.21 *** | 0.27 *** | 0.18 ** | 0.29 *** | 0.23 *** | 0.25 *** | 0.27 ** | 0.22 *** | 0.33 *** |
| H4 | 0.47 *** | 0.36 *** | 0.46 *** | 0.39 *** | 0.46 *** | 0.44 *** | 0.44 *** | 0.45 *** | 0.40 *** | 0.53 *** |
| H5 | 0.52 *** | 0.44 *** | 0.50 *** | 0.53 *** | 0.49 *** | 0.52 *** | 0.45 *** | 0.45 *** | 0.51 *** | 0.48 *** |
| H7 | 0.31 *** | 0.26 *** | 0.27 *** | 0.34 *** | 0.22 *** | 0.33 *** | 0.25 *** | 0.25 ** | 0.31 *** | 0.24 ** |
Note: ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.