Literature DB >> 3545614

Nifedipine. Relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

C H Kleinbloesem, P van Brummelen, D D Breimer.   

Abstract

The availability of specific chemical assays and the development of appropriate biological models have made it feasible to study the relationship between the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of nifedipine, a relationship that is presumed to be sigmoidal for most effects. In healthy volunteers the haemodynamic effects of a single dose of nifedipine are markedly influenced by the pharmaceutical preparation and the rate of drug input. When the plasma concentration of nifedipine increases rapidly, such as after an intravenous bolus injection or rapidly disintegrating capsules, there is a marked increase in heart rate and little or even no effect on blood pressure. On the other hand, when the drug is given as a slow intravenous infusion or as a sustained release tablet and when the capsules are taken together with food, the decrease in blood pressure is accompanied by few or no changes in heart rate. Furthermore, it has been shown that not only haemodynamic effects of nifedipine, but also oesophageal motor function may be used as a quantifiable pharmacological effect. For patients with angina pectoris, a plasma concentration range that is associated with optimal treatment has not been defined, since large inter-individual variations in the nifedipine plasma concentration were observed in effectively treated patients. For patients with hypertension, significant sigmoidally shaped correlations between blood pressure reduction and nifedipine plasma concentrations following single or multiple doses have been demonstrated. The concentration-effect parameters were very similar to those found for normotensive subjects. After 6 weeks of treatment the potency of the drug had decreased, which might indicate the development of some tolerance. In patients with severe renal impairment, the maximal effect of nifedipine on diastolic blood pressure was more than doubled, which cannot be explained by differences in pharmacokinetics; therefore these patients appear to be more sensitive at the pharmacodynamic level. In patients with liver cirrhosis, the pharmacokinetics of nifedipine were quite different due to reduced protein binding and reduced enzyme activity; in patients with a portacaval shunt, considerable increased bypassing of the liver during the first pass after oral administration was observed. When corrected for free drug concentrations, the concentration-effect relationship for these patients is essentially the same as that found for healthy subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3545614     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-198712010-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  31 in total

1.  Correlation of plasma levels of nifedipine and cardiovascular effects after sublingual dosing in normal subjects.

Authors:  M Traube; M Hongo; R G McAllister; R W McCallum
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.126

2.  Determination of nifedipine in serum or plasma by reversed-phase liquid chromatography.

Authors:  P R Bach
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 3.  Understanding the dose-effect relationship: clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models.

Authors:  N H Holford; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Nifedipine plasma concentration in patients treated for angina pectoris.

Authors:  Z Stern; E Zylber-Katz; M Levy
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol       Date:  1984-04

5.  Study of the influence of nifedipine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propranolol, metoprolol and atenolol.

Authors:  D Gangji; M Juvent; G Niset; M Wathieu; M Degreve; R Bellens; J Poortmans; S Degre; T J Fitzsimons; A Herchuelz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of verapamil, nifedipine and diltiazem.

Authors:  H Echizen; M Eichelbaum
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Nifedipine: kinetics and dynamics in healthy subjects.

Authors:  C H Kleinbloesem; P van Brummelen; J A van de Linde; P J Voogd; D D Breimer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Acute antihypertensive effect and pharmacokinetics of a tablet preparation of nifedipine.

Authors:  O Banzet; J N Colin; M Thibonnier; E Singlas; J M Alexandre; P Corvol
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  The effects on left ventricular performance of nifedipine and verapamil in exercise-induced angina pectoris.

Authors:  B Silke; S P Verma; G I Nelson; R C Ahuja; M Hussain; S H Taylor
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Influence of haemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics and haemodynamic effects of nifedipine during continuous intravenous infusion.

Authors:  C H Kleinbloesem; P van Brummelen; A J Woittiez; H Faber; D D Breimer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.447

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic characterization of controlled-release formulations.

Authors:  V W Steinijans
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.441

2.  Influence of single- and multiple-dose omeprazole treatment on nifedipine pharmacokinetics and effects in healthy subjects.

Authors:  P A Soons; G van den Berg; M Danhof; P van Brummelen; J B Jansen; C B Lamers; D D Breimer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  The description and prediction of antihypertensive drug response: an individualised approach.

Authors:  R Donnelly; P A Meredith; H L Elliott
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Age-related changes in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nifedipine.

Authors:  D R Robertson; D G Waller; A G Renwick; C F George
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Current models in pharmacokinetics: applications in veterinary pharmacology.

Authors:  L D Kinabo; Q A McKellar
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 6.  Antihypertensive therapy in the aged patient. Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations.

Authors:  R W Piepho; K J Fendler
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  Influence of drug formulation on drug concentration-effect relationships.

Authors:  G Castañeda-Hernández; G Caillé; P du Souich
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  The nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS). Evaluation of pharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacological properties.

Authors:  J S Grundy; R T Foster
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Human lymphatic vessel contractile activity is inhibited in vitro but not in vivo by the calcium channel blocker nifedipine.

Authors:  Niklas Telinius; Sheyanth Mohanakumar; Jens Majgaard; Sukhan Kim; Hans Pilegaard; Einar Pahle; Jørn Nielsen; Marc de Leval; Christian Aalkjaer; Vibeke Hjortdal; Donna Briggs Boedtkjer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of amlodipine.

Authors:  P A Meredith; H L Elliott
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.