Literature DB >> 2200687

Pharmacokinetic characterization of controlled-release formulations.

V W Steinijans1.   

Abstract

The development of controlled-release formulations should be based on a clinico-pharmacological rationale such as increased compliance, reduced side effects and improved efficacy. The pharmacokinetic profile of a controlled-release formulation and its dose regimen should be compared under steady-state conditions with that of an immediate-release formulation or that of another controlled-release formulation. Apart from conventional characteristics such as AUC, tmax and Cmax, alternative characteristics are suggested such as residual concentration at the end of the dose interval, peak-through fluctuation in steady state, plateau time, statistical moments, in vivo input functions and intravenous infusion schemes which mimic the concentration/time profile after oral administration of the controlled-release formulation. The pharmacokinetic steady-state profile should be reproduced with and without food, from day to day, and at various dose levels. The in vitro specification should be based on in vivo requirements for "within-product bioequivalence".

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2200687     DOI: 10.1007/BF03190201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0378-7966            Impact factor:   2.441


  18 in total

1.  Per cent absorbed time plots derived from blood level and/or urinary excretion data.

Authors:  J G WAGNER; E NELSON
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1963-06       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  Pharmacokinetic determinants in the design and evaluation of sustained-release dosage forms.

Authors:  H Boxenbaum
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Twenty-four hour lung function in adult patients with asthma. Chronoptimized theophylline therapy once-daily dosing in the evening versus conventional twice-daily dosing.

Authors:  G E D'Alonzo; M H Smolensky; S Feldman; L A Gianotti; M B Emerson; H Staudinger; V W Steinijans
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1990-07

4.  A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability.

Authors:  D J Schuirmann
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1987-12

5.  Editorial: Single daily dose of antidepressants.

Authors:  F J Ayd
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1974-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A novel approach to the specification of in-vitro dissolution boundaries based on regulatory requirements for bioequivalence.

Authors:  V W Steinijans; R Dietrich; H Trautmann; R Sauter; G Benedikt
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1988-08

7.  Statistical moments in pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  K Yamaoka; T Nakagawa; T Uno
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1978-12

8.  Disposition and clinical pharmacokinetics of theophylline after administration of a new sustained release tablet.

Authors:  J H Jonkman; W C Berg; K de Vries; R A de Zeeuw; R Schoenmaker; N Grimberg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Drug defaulting in a general practice.

Authors:  A M Porter
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1969-01-25

Review 10.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of urapidil.

Authors:  R Kirsten; K Nelson; V W Steinijans; K Zech; R Haerlin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 6.447

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Current status of sustained release formulations in the treatment of hypertension. An overview.

Authors:  E Mutschler; H Knauf
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Controversies in bioequivalence studies.

Authors:  V W Steinijans; D Hauschke; J H Jonkman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Average parameters in bioavailability studies: an application to slow-release amitriptyline formulation.

Authors:  P Fagiolino; M Vázquez; E Savio; L Domínguez; J M Aiache; E Beyssac
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.441

4.  Average parameters as a trend to reduce the residual variability in bioequivalence trials.

Authors:  P Fagiolino; M Vazquez
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.441

5.  Dose proportionality of a hydrocodone extended-release tablet formulated with abuse-deterrence technology.

Authors:  Mona Darwish; Ronghua Yang; William Tracewell; Philmore Robertson; Mary Bond
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 6.  Metrics for the evaluation of bioequivalence of modified-release formulations.

Authors:  Laszlo Endrenyi; Laszlo Tothfalusi
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Effect of diet on the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of sustained-release ketoprofen.

Authors:  A Le Liboux; M Teule; A Frydman; B Oosterhuis; J H Jonkman
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Relative bioavailability of different oral sustained release oxprenolol tablets.

Authors:  S E Leucuta; M Follidis; R Capalneanu; A Mocan
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 9.  The nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS). Evaluation of pharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacological properties.

Authors:  J S Grundy; R T Foster
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Oral heroin in opioid-dependent patients: pharmacokinetic comparison of immediate and extended release tablets.

Authors:  Ludwig Perger; Katharina M Rentsch; Gerd A Kullak-Ublick; Davide Verotta; Karin Fattinger
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 4.384

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.