| Literature DB >> 35455739 |
Christelle de la Fouchardière1,2,3, Pia Gamradt1,2,3, Sylvie Chabaud3, Maxime Raddaz3, Ellen Blanc3, Olivier Msika3, Isabelle Treilleux1,2,3, Sophie Bachy1,2,3, Anne Cattey-Javouhey3, Pierre Guibert3, Matthieu Sarabi1,3, Pauline Rochefort3, Pamela Funk-Debleds3, Clélia Coutzac1,3, Isabelle Ray-Coquard3, Patrice Peyrat3, Pierre Meeus3, Michel Rivoire1,3, Aurélien Dupré1,3, Ana Hennino1,2,3.
Abstract
With an overall survival rate of 2-9% at 5 years, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the industrialized world and is predicted to become the second by 2030. Owing to often late diagnosis and rare actionable molecular alterations, PDAC has not yet benefited from the recent therapeutic advances that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have provided in other cancer types, except in specific subgroups of patients presenting with tumors with high mutational burden (TMB) or microsatellite instability (MSI). The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a substantial role in therapeutic resistance by facilitating immune evasion. An extracellular stromal protein, βig-h3/TGFβi, is involved in the pathogenesis of PDAC by hampering T cell activation and promoting stiffness of the TME. The study BIGHPANC included 41 patients with metastatic PDAC, and analyzed βig-h3 levels in serum and tumor samples to assess the βig-h3 prognostic value. βig-h3 serum levels are significantly associated with overall survival (HR 2.05, 95%CI 1.07-3.93; p = 0.0301). Our results suggest that βig-h3 serum levels may be considered a prognostic biomarker in patients with metastatic PDAC.Entities:
Keywords: BIGHPANC; TGFbeta; immune checkpoint inhibitors; pancreatic adenocarcinoma; pancreatic cancer; prognostic analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35455739 PMCID: PMC9025577 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12040623
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pers Med ISSN: 2075-4426
Patient and tumor characteristics.
| All n = 41 | βig-h3 | Test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (n = 21) | High (n = 20) | |||
| Age | Wilcoxon | |||
| Median (min; max) | 65.0 (41; 78) | 61.0 (41; 76) | 67.0 (45; 78) | |
| Gender | Fisher Exact | |||
| Female | 13 (31.7%) | 10 (47.6%) | 3 (15.0%) | |
| Male | 11 (52.4%) | 17 (85.0%) | ||
| Performance Status (ECOG) | Fisher Exact | |||
| 0 | 3 (7.3%) | 1 (4.8%) | 2 (10.0%) | |
| 1 | 33 (80.5) | 17 (81.0%) | 16 (80.0%) | |
| 2 | 5 (12.2%) | 3 (14.3%) | 2 (10.0%) | |
| Tobacco | Fisher Exact | |||
| Never | 22 (53.7%) | 12 (57.1%) | 10 (50.0%) | |
| Current/former | 9 (42.9%) | 10 (50.0%) | ||
| Diabetes | Fisher Exact | |||
| No | 34 (82.9%) | 18 (85.7%) | 16 (80.0%) | |
| Yes | 3 (14.3%) | 4 (20.0%) | ||
| Primary tumor localization | Fisher Exact | |||
| Head | 14 (34.1%) | 7 (33.3%) | 7 (35.0%) | |
| Body | 15 (36.6%) | 5 (23.8%) | 10 (50.0%) | |
| Tail | 12 (29.3%) | 9 (42.9%) | 3 (15.0%) | |
| Metastatic site (at diagnosis) | Fisher Exact | |||
| Liver | ||||
| No | 11 (26.8%) | 7 (33.3%) | 4 (20.0%) | |
| Yes | 30 (73.2%) | 14 (66.7%) | 16 (80.0%) | |
| Lung | Fisher Exact | |||
| No | 34 (82.9%) | 17 (81.0%) | 17 (85.0%) | |
| Yes | 4 (19.0%) | 3 (15.0%) | ||
| Peritoneum | Fisher Exact | |||
| No | 31 (75.6%) | 14 (66.7%) | 17 (85.0%) | |
| Yes | 7 (33.3%) | 3 (15.0%) | ||
| Lymph nodes | Fisher Exact | |||
| No | 25 (61.0%) | 15 (71,4%) | 10 (50%) | |
| Yes | 6 (28.6%) | 10 (50%) | ||
| Bone | Fisher Exact | |||
| No | 37 (90.2%) | 19 (90.5%) | 18 (90.0%) | |
| Yes | 2 (9.5%) | 2 (10.0%) | ||
| Number of metastatic sites | Wilcoxon | |||
| 1 | 20 (48.8%) | 13 (61.9%) | 7 (35.0%) | |
| 2 | 12 (29.3%) | 3 (14.3%) | 9 (45.0%) | |
| 3 | 7 (17.1%) | 3 (14.3%) | 4 (20.0%) | |
| 4 | 2 (4.9%) | 2 (9.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Median (min; max) | 2.0 (1; 4) | 1.0 (1; 4) | 2.0 (1; 3) | |
| Differentiation grade | Fisher Exact | |||
| Unknown | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Low | 8 (20.5%) | 7 (33.3%) | 1 (5.6%) | |
| Intermediate | 24 (61.5%) | 12 (57.1%) | 12 (66.7%) | |
| High | 7 (17.9%) | 2 (9.5%) | 5 (27.8%) | |
| Ca 19-9 at diagnosis (UI/l) | Wilcoxon | |||
| Median (min; max) | 2497.0 | 2497.0 | 2027.0 | |
| (9; 128600) | (10; 128600) | (9; 84720) | ||
| CEA at diagnosis (ng/mL) | Wilcoxon | |||
| Median (min; max) | 8.0 (2; 810) | 8.0 (2; 258) | 8.5 (2; 810) | |
| Chemotherapy lines number | Fisher Exact | |||
| 1 | 8 (20.0%) | 2 (9.5%) | 6 (31.6%) | |
| 2 | 15 (37.5%) | 8 (38.1%) | 7 (36.8%) | |
| 3 | 14 (35.0%) | 9 (42.9%) | 5 (26.3%) | |
| 4 | 3 (7.5%) | 2 (9.5%) | 1 (5.3%) | |
| Chemotherapy regimen (L1) | Fisher Exact | |||
| FOLFIRINOX | 29 (72.5%) | 15 (71.4%) | 14 (73.7%) | |
| Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel | 1 (2.5%) | 1 (4.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Gemcitabine | 3 (7.5%) | 2 (9.5%) | 1 (5.3%) | |
| Other | 7 (17.5%) | 3 (14.3%) | 4 (21.1%) | |
Figure 1Overall survival according to βig-h3 serum levels. Overall survival was calculated from the date of initial diagnosis to the date of death or censored to the date of the latest news. Survival curves with associated log-rank tests were generated using the Kaplan–Meier method.
Analysis for overall survival.
| Event/Total | Median | Hazard Ratio | Survival Estimates | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.0270 * | ||||
| Low | 18/21 | 14.8 (9.7–21.3) | Reference | 6 months: | |
| High | 20/20 | 10.2 (3.0–13.1) | 2.05 (1.07–3.93) | 6 months: |
KM Kaplan-Meier method; Cox Cox model; * Logrank test.
Uni- and multi-variate analysis for overall survival (Cox regression).
| Univariate Cox Model | Multivariate Cox Model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | CI95% | HR | CI95% | ||||
| βig-h3 | Low | 0.0301 | 0.0156 | ||||
| High | 2.053 | [1.07–3.93] | 2.332 | [1.174–4.633] | |||
| ECOG-PS | 0–1 | 0.1591 | 0.0413 | ||||
| 2,3,4 | 1.997 | [0.76–5.23] | 2.964 | [1.044–8.418] | |||
| Age | <65 | 0.6911 | |||||
| ≥65 | 1.139 | [0.60–2.16] | |||||
| Liver metastases | No | 0.0561 | ns | ||||
| Yes | 2.093 | [0.98–4.46] | |||||
| CA19-9 | Low | 0.3118 | |||||
| High | 1.397 | [0.73–2.67] | |||||
| Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte | ≤5 | 0.0016 | 0.0024 | ||||
| >5 | 5.068 | [1.85–13.9] | 4.962 | [1.764–13.964] | |||
| Gender | F | 0.0593 | ns | ||||
| M | 2.038 | [0.97–4.27] | |||||
Figure 2βig-h3, CD163, and CD8 staining in pancreas biopsies. (A) Immunohistochemistry staining of pancreatic biopsies for 2 patients with low and high βig-h3 serum levels stained for βig-h3, CD163, and CD8. Quantification of the CD163 staining area (B) of CD8+ T cells number (C) and in 7 patients. ** p < 0.01. HPF: high-power field. Scale bar 100 μm.