| Literature DB >> 35454964 |
Nazmin Ahmed1, Gianluca Ferini2, Mosharef A T M Hossain3, Kanak Kanti Barua4, Mohammad Nazrul Hossain1, Giuseppe Emmanuele Umana5, Nathan A Shlobin6, Gianluca Scalia7, Paolo Palmisciano5, Ottavio S Tomasi8, Bipin Chaurasia9.
Abstract
(1) Background: Meningiomas are usually benign encapsulated intracranial tumors with well-defined borders that offer a high chance of cure with complete removal. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between preoperative MRI features and surgical plane of cleavage. (2) Materials andEntities:
Keywords: MRI; cleavage; meningioma; surgical plane; tumor size
Year: 2022 PMID: 35454964 PMCID: PMC9025407 DOI: 10.3390/life12040473
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Figure 1MRI of brain T1-WI axial section demonstrates small (A), medium (B), and large size meningioma (C).
Figure 2MRI of brain T2WI axial section demonstrates Absent peritumoral edema (A), Focal edema (B), Lobar or hemispheric edema (C).
Figure 3MRI of Brain, T2WI axial section demonstrates Iso- to hypointense (A), Hyperintense (B), Mixed intensity (C) tumor.
Figure 42-Dimensional schematic picture of a convexity meningioma demonstrates Extrapial (A), Mixed (B), and Subpial (C) surgical cleavage plane (marked by blue arrow).
Descriptive statistics of the patient demographics.
| Variables | Category | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ≤30 | 10 | 20.8 |
| 31–40 | 13 | 27.1 | |
| 41–50 | 10 | 20.8 | |
| 51–60 | 12 | 25.0 | |
| >60 | 3 | 6.3 | |
| Gender | Male | 31 | 64.6 |
| Female | 17 | 35.4 | |
| Location of meningioma | Convexity | 14 | 29.16 |
| Sphenoid wing | 11 | 22.91 | |
| Parasagittal | 10 | 20.83 | |
| Falcine | 7 | 14.58 | |
| Others | 6 | 12.5 | |
| Tumor size | Small | 5 | 10.4 |
| Medium | 33 | 68.8 | |
| Large | 10 | 20.8 | |
| Tumor intensity | Hyperintense | 36 | 75.0 |
| Iso- to hypointense | 9 | 18.8 | |
| Mixed | 3 | 6.3 | |
| Peritumoral edema | Focal edema | 16 | 33.3 |
| Lobar or hemispheric edema | 16 | 33.3 | |
| No edema | 16 | 33.3 | |
| Simpson’s grading | Grade 0 | 3 | 6.2% |
| Grade I | 15 | 31.5 | |
| Grade II | 30 | 62.5 | |
| Histopathological findings | Meningioma, WHO—I | 47 | 97.9 |
| Meningioma, WHO—II | 1 | 2.1 |
Association between tumor characteristics and surgical plane of cleavage.
| Variables | Category | Surgical Plane of Cleavage | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extrapial (%) | Mixed (%) | Subpial (%) | |||
| Tumor size | Small | 4 (80.0) | 1 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.055 |
| Medium | 17 (81.8) | 3 (9.1) | 3 (9.1) | ||
| Large | 5 (50.0) | 5 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| Intensity of tumor parenchyma | Hyperintense | 28 (77.8) | 6 (16.7) | 2 (5.6) | 0.881 |
| Iso- to hypointense | 6 (66.7) | 2 (22.2) | 1 (11.1) | ||
| Mixed | 2 (66.7) | 1 (33.3) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| Peritumoral edema | No edema | 12 (75.0) | 3 (18.8) | 1 (6.3) | 0.934 |
| Focal | 13 (81.3) | 2 (12.5) | 1 (6.3) | ||
| Lobar or hemispheric | 11 (68.8) | 4 (25.0) | 1 (6.3) | ||