Literature DB >> 3545442

Incidence and methodologic aspects of the occurrence of liver metastases in recurrent breast cancer.

C Kamby, H Dirksen, I Vejborg, S Daugaard, B Guldhammer, N Rossing, H T Mouridsen.   

Abstract

The occurrence of liver metastases was evaluated by ultrasonic scanning and correlated with prognostic factors, pattern of metastases, clinical examination, biochemical liver function tests from serum, and liver biopsy specimens in 394 consecutive evaluable patients with first recurrence of breast cancer. Fifty-nine patients (15%) had a positive scan, and liver metastases were the only sign of recurrent disease in 11 of these patients. The presence of liver metastases was not associated with age, menopausal status, size of the primary tumor, regional lymph node status, or the length of the recurrence-free interval; but patients with liver metastases were significantly closer to the menopause than those without (P = 0.02). The diagnostic value of clinical examinations was comparable to that of serum bilirubin and serum aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) analyses, but was significantly better than alkaline phosphatase (AP) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) analyses. Analysis of serum AP was not a valuable diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of liver metastases, since it was elevated in 58% of the patients with bone metastases, and since metastases in this site were found in one third of the patients without liver metastases. If all four tests were negative, liver metastases were excluded in 99% of the patients, and if more than two of the four tests were positive, liver metastases were found in 95%. Valid (greater than 80%) diagnosis of liver metastases by serum LDH or serum ASAT alone, required an elevation of three or five times the upper normal limits, respectively. Thirty-nine patients with positive ultrasonography results underwent biopsy. The ultrasonographic diagnosis could not be confirmed histologically in three patients (8%). If ultrasonic scanning had not been performed routinely, only one of 213 patients (0.5%) with soft tissue metastases would have been offered local therapy rather than systemic treatment. These data suggest that ultrasonic scanning of the liver should not be a routine diagnostic tool in examination of patients with first recurrence of breast cancer. However, whenever indicated by clinical signs or elevated blood tests, scanning should be performed to confirm the presence of liver metastases, particularly in patients entering therapeutical trials, since liver metastases demonstrated by ultrasound examinations may serve as a measurable parameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3545442     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870415)59:8<1524::aid-cncr2820590823>3.0.co;2-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  6 in total

1.  Value of bone scanning in the follow-up of breast cancer patients. A study of 1000 cases.

Authors:  H Schünemann; P J Langecker; W Ellgas; A Leonhardt; H Merkl
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Indications for hepatic ultrasonography in breast cancer staging and follow-up.

Authors:  J N Bruneton; C Balu-Maestro; C Raffaelli; M Y Mourou; P Cambon; C Granon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Multiple nodular foci in the liver associated with chronic hepatic porphyria after previous treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  W K Lelbach; T R Müller; W Kersjes; J H Hartlapp; M Doss
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1989-06-01

4.  Breast liver metastases--incidence, diagnosis and outcome.

Authors:  A L Hoe; G T Royle; I Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 18.000

5.  Oestrogen receptor status of primary breast carcinomas and their metastases. Relation to pattern of spread and survival after recurrence.

Authors:  C Kamby; B B Rasmussen; B Kristensen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  The role of surgical intervention for isolated breast cancer liver metastasis: Results of case-control study with comparison to medical treatment.

Authors:  Jiahuai Wen; Feng Ye; Fengfeng Xie; Dan Liu; LeZhen Huang; Chen Fang; Shaowen Zhong; Liping Ren
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.452

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.