Literature DB >> 8750579

Indications for hepatic ultrasonography in breast cancer staging and follow-up.

J N Bruneton1, C Balu-Maestro, C Raffaelli, M Y Mourou, P Cambon, C Granon.   

Abstract

Retrospective analysis of the medical records of 6649 breast cancer patients seen over an 11-year period found 438 patients (6.6%) with liver metastases (LM) and 432 patients (6.5%) with benign liver lesions (BLL). Liver ultrasonography (LUS) and liver function tests had been performed for all patients. LM were the first manifestation of metastatic spread in 20.1% of the 438 patients; median survival was related to the presence (6.7 mo.) or absence (12.2 mo.) of extrahepatic metastases (EHM). Liver function tests were normal in 20.5% of the patients in whom LM were first diagnosed by LUS. Most LM were hypoechoic (70.9%) BLL corresponded to cysts, hemangiomas, calcifications, and focal fatty infiltration. LUS appears indicated for (i) pretherapy disease staging, and in particular for detection of BLL, and (ii) follow-up of patients without EHM for early diagnosis of LM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8750579     DOI: 10.1007/bf01806493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  15 in total

1.  Detection of hepatic masses in patients with carcinoma: comparative sensitivities of sonography, CT, and MR imaging.

Authors:  K Wernecke; E Rummeny; G Bongartz; P Vassallo; D Kivelitz; W Wiesmann; P E Peters; B Reers; M Reiser; W Pircher
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Imaging primary and metastatic cancer of the liver.

Authors:  R A Halvorsen; W M Thompson
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Clinical course of breast cancer patients with liver metastases.

Authors:  J W Zinser; G N Hortobagyi; A U Buzdar; T L Smith; G Fraschini
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The mistaken or indeterminate CT diagnosis of hepatic metastases: the value of sonography.

Authors:  S H Brick; M C Hill; I M Lande
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Benign versus malignant hepatic lesions. A diagnostic dilemma with breast cancer patients.

Authors:  L A Harkins; H Y Yap; A U Buzdar; G R Blumenschein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  The distinction between benign and malignant liver tumors on sonography: value of a hypoechoic halo.

Authors:  K Wernecke; P Vassallo; U Bick; S Diederich; P E Peters
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Intraoperative ultrasonography in screening for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: comparative accuracy with traditional procedures.

Authors:  J Machi; H Isomoto; Y Yamashita; T Kurohiji; K Shirouzu; T Kakegawa
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  [Cancer of the breast and ultrasonographic nodule of the liver].

Authors:  M Carrere; J M Lorphelin; O Ghemard; F Kunstlinger
Journal:  Ann Radiol (Paris)       Date:  1989

9.  Human breast cancer: survival from first metastasis. Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  P G Koenders; L V Beex; P W Kloppenborg; A G Smals; T J Benraad
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Ultrasonographic posttreatment follow-up of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  C Balu-Maestro; J N Bruneton; A Geoffray; C Chauvel; A Rogopoulos; O Bittman
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  1 in total

1.  Staging Investigations in Breast Cancer: Collective Opinion of UK Breast Surgeons.

Authors:  N Chand; R I Cutress; R S Oeppen; A Agrawal
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-11-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.