| Literature DB >> 35454190 |
Rodrigo Santibáñez1, Felipe Lara2, Teresa M Barros3, Elizabeth Mardones4, Françoise Cuadra4, Pamela Thomson4.
Abstract
The ocular microbiome in horses is poorly described compared to other species, and most of the information available in the literature is based on traditional techniques, which has limited the depth of the knowledge on the subject. The objective of this study was to characterize and predict the metabolic pathways of the ocular microbiome of a group of healthy horses. Conjunctival swabs were obtained from both eyes of 14 horses, and DNA extraction was performed from the swabs, followed by next generation sequencing and bioinformatics analyses employing DADA2 and PICRUSt2. A total of 17 phyla were identified, of which Pseudomonadota (Proteobacteria) was the most abundant (59.88%), followed by Actinomycetota (Actinobacteria) (22.44%) and Bacteroidota (Bacteroidetes) (16.39%), totaling an average of 98.72% of the communities. Similarly, of the 278 genera identified, Massilia, Pedobacter, Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas, Suttonella and Verticia were present in more than 5% of the samples analyzed. Both Actinobacteria and Bacteroides showed great heterogeneity within the samples. The most abundant inferred metabolic functions were related to vital functions for bacteria such as aerobic respiration, amino acid, and lipid biosynthesis.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene; horses; microbiome; ocular surface
Year: 2022 PMID: 35454190 PMCID: PMC9028004 DOI: 10.3390/ani12080943
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Figure 1Rarefaction curves. Each sample was analyzed to determine the number of unique ASVs (y-axis) as a function of the sample size (x-axis). Rarefaction curves show saturation of the identified ASVs as the deep increased.
Figure 2Relative abundance of taxa (A). Relative abundance of the most abundant identified phyla. Reads derived from both eyes were combined and phyla with an average relative abundance lower than 1% were labeled as “others”. The three plotted phyla represent 98.72% on average of the total relative abundance of all samples. (B). Relative abundance of the most abundant identified genera. Reads derived from both eyes were combined and genera with an average relative abundance lower than 5% were labeled as “others”. The six plotted genera represent 36.59% on average of the total relative abundance of each sample. The “other” genera represent 63.41% on average (Supplementary Table S1).
Figure 3Most relatively abundant inferred pathways and functions employing PICRUSt2 (A). The 10 most abundant inferred pathways surpassed the 0.5% threshold. (B). The 10 most abundant inferred functions abundances surpassed the 0.35% threshold.
Figure 4Contribution of the most abundant phylum and contribution of other genera than Massilia, Pedobacter, Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas, Suttonella and Verticia to each metabolic pathway and function per sample. Proteobacteria contributes more than 20% to each pathway and more than 40% to each function. In the case of genera, “others” contribute more than 20% to each pathway and function per sample.