Literature DB >> 31258108

Short-term impact of sucralose consumption on the metabolic response and gut microbiome of healthy adults.

Pamela Thomson1, Rodrigo Santibañez1, Carolina Aguirre2, Jose E Galgani2,3, Daniel Garrido1.   

Abstract

Sucralose is an artificial non-nutritive sweetener used in foods aimed to reduce sugar and energy intake. While thought to be inert, the impact of sucralose on metabolic control has shown to be the opposite. The gut microbiome has emerged as a factor shaping metabolic responses after sweetener consumption. We examined the short-term effect of sucralose consumption on glucose homeostasis and gut microbiome of healthy male volunteers. We performed a randomised, double-blind study in thirty-four subjects divided into two groups, one that was administered sucralose capsules (780 mg/d for 7 d; n 17) and a control group receiving placebo (n 17). Before and after the intervention, glycaemic and insulinaemic responses were assessed with a standard oral glucose load (75 g). Insulin resistance was determined using homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance and Matsuda indexes. The gut microbiome was evaluated before and after the intervention by 16S rRNA sequencing. During the study, body weight remained constant in both groups. Glycaemic control and insulin resistance were not affected during the 7-d period. At the phylum level, gut microbiome was not modified in any group. We classified subjects according to their change in insulinaemia after the intervention, to compare the microbiome of responders and non-responders. Independent of consuming sucralose or placebo, individuals with a higher insulinaemic response after the intervention had lower Bacteroidetes and higher Firmicutes abundances. In conclusion, consumption of high doses of sucralose for 7 d does not alter glycaemic control, insulin resistance, or gut microbiome in healthy individuals. However, it highlights the need to address individual responses to sucralose.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glucose control; Gut microbiome; Insulin; Non-energy artificial sweeteners; Sucralose

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31258108     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114519001570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  21 in total

1.  Characterization and Identification of Probiotic Features in Lacticaseibacillus Paracasei Using a Comparative Genomic Analysis Approach.

Authors:  Alexis Torres-Miranda; Felipe Melis-Arcos; Daniel Garrido
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 5.265

2.  An Overview of Current Knowledge of the Gut Microbiota and Low-Calorie Sweeteners.

Authors:  Riley L Hughes; Cindy D Davis; Alexandra Lobach; Hannah D Holscher
Journal:  Nutr Today       Date:  2021 May-Jun

3.  High-dose saccharin supplementation does not induce gut microbiota changes or glucose intolerance in healthy humans and mice.

Authors:  Joan Serrano; Kathleen R Smith; Audra L Crouch; Vandana Sharma; Fanchao Yi; Veronika Vargova; Traci E LaMoia; Lydia M Dupont; Vanida Serna; Fenfen Tang; Laisa Gomes-Dias; Joshua J Blakeslee; Emmanuel Hatzakis; Scott N Peterson; Matthew Anderson; Richard E Pratley; George A Kyriazis
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 14.650

Review 4.  Sucralose and Cardiometabolic Health: Current Understanding from Receptors to Clinical Investigations.

Authors:  Sydney Risdon; Sylvain Battault; Alonso Romo-Romo; Matthieu Roustit; Loic Briand; Grégory Meyer; Paloma Almeda-Valdes; Guillaume Walther
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 5.  Diet and the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis: Sowing the Seeds of Good Mental Health.

Authors:  Kirsten Berding; Klara Vlckova; Wolfgang Marx; Harriet Schellekens; Catherine Stanton; Gerard Clarke; Felice Jacka; Timothy G Dinan; John F Cryan
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 6.  The effects of low-calorie sweeteners on energy intake and body weight: a systematic review and meta-analyses of sustained intervention studies.

Authors:  Peter J Rogers; Katherine M Appleton
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 5.551

Review 7.  Plausible Biological Interactions of Low- and Non-Calorie Sweeteners with the Intestinal Microbiota: An Update of Recent Studies.

Authors:  Julio Plaza-Diaz; Belén Pastor-Villaescusa; Ascensión Rueda-Robles; Francisco Abadia-Molina; Francisco Javier Ruiz-Ojeda
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Cross-Regional View of Functional and Taxonomic Microbiota Composition in Obesity and Post-obesity Treatment Shows Country Specific Microbial Contribution.

Authors:  Daniel A Medina; Tianlu Li; Pamela Thomson; Alejandro Artacho; Vicente Pérez-Brocal; Andrés Moya
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Effects of the Daily Consumption of Stevia on Glucose Homeostasis, Body Weight, and Energy Intake: A Randomised Open-Label 12-Week Trial in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Nikoleta S Stamataki; Benjamin Crooks; Abubaker Ahmed; John T McLaughlin
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  The Impact of Artificial Sweeteners on Body Weight Control and Glucose Homeostasis.

Authors:  Michelle D Pang; Gijs H Goossens; Ellen E Blaak
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-01-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.