| Literature DB >> 35454183 |
Katerina Jazbec1, Mojca Jež1, Urban Švajger1,2, Boštjan Smrekar1, Simona Miceska1, Uroš Rajčevič1, Mojca Justin1, Janja Završnik3, Tadej Malovrh4, Tanja Švara5, Mitja Gombač5, Živa Ramšak6, Primož Rožman1.
Abstract
The stem cell theory of aging postulates that stem cells become inefficient at maintaining the original functions of the tissues. We, therefore, hypothesized that transplanting young bone marrow (BM) to old recipients would lead to rejuvenating effects on immunity, followed by improved general health, decreased frailty, and possibly life span extension. We developed a murine model of non-myeloablative heterochronic BM transplantation in which old female BALB/c mice at 14, 16, and 18(19) months of age received altogether 125.1 ± 15.6 million nucleated BM cells from young male donors aged 7-13 weeks. At 21 months, donor chimerism was determined, and the immune system's innate and adaptive arms were analyzed. Mice were then observed for general health and frailty until spontaneous death, when their lifespan, post-mortem examinations, and histopathological changes were recorded. The results showed that the old mice developed on average 18.7 ± 9.6% donor chimerism in the BM and showed certain improvements in their innate and adaptive arms of the immune system, such as favorable counts of neutrophils in the spleen and BM, central memory Th cells, effector/effector memory Th and Tc cells in the spleen, and B1a and B1b cells in the peritoneal cavity. Borderline enhanced lymphocyte proliferation capacity was also seen. The frailty parameters, pathomorphological results, and life spans did not differ significantly in the transplanted vs. control group of mice. In conclusion, although several favorable effects are obtained in our heterochronic non-myeloablative transplantation model, additional optimization is needed for better rejuvenation effects.Entities:
Keywords: BMT; aging; bone marrow transplantation; cell isolation; frailty index; hematopoietic stem cells; immune system; longevity; mice
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35454183 PMCID: PMC9028083 DOI: 10.3390/biom12040595
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1The experimental scheme. Numbers indicate the age of mice in months, “BM cells” indicate the time of BM transplantations, and “sham” the time of DPBS injections. Legend: BMT group—received the BMT, SHAM group—control group, and Y group—control group of young female mice.
Immunophenotyping by flow cytometry (cell source: spleen).
| Cell Populations in the Spleen | Heterochronic BMT Effects |
|---|---|
| CD11b+Ly6G-monocytes/macrophages | ns |
| CD11b+Ly6G-Ly6Chi inflammatory monocytes | ns |
| CD11b+Ly6G-Ly6C-/lo non-inflammatory monocytes | ns |
| CD11b+Ly6G+ neutrophils | ⊕ * |
| CD19+CD21/35-CD23-CD43-AA4.1-ABCs | ns |
| CD19+CD21/35+CD23+CD43-AA4.1-FO B cells | ns |
| CD19+CD21/35+CD23-CD43-AA4.1-MZ B cells | ns |
| CD3+ T cells | ns |
| CD3+CD4+ Th cells | ns |
| CD3+CD4+CD44-CD62L+ naïve Th cells | ns |
| CD3+CD4+CD44+CD62L+ central memory Th cells | ⊕ * |
| CD3+CD4+CD44+CD62L- effector/effector memory Th cells | ⊕ (*) |
| CD3+CD8a+ Tc cells | ns |
| CD3+CD8a+CD44-CD62L+ naïve Tc cells | ns |
| CD3+CD8a+CD44+CD62L+ central memory Tc cells | ns |
| CD3+CD8a+CD44+CD62L- effector/effector memory Tc cells | ⊕ * |
| CD3+CD8a+CD44-CD62L-acute/activated effector cells Tc cells | ns |
| CD4+FoxP3+ | ns |
| CD4+FoxP3+CD25+ Treg | ns |
Legend: ⊕ rejuvenating effect, (*)—p = 0.056, *—p < 0.05, ns—not significant.
Immunophenotyping by flow cytometry (cell source: bone marrow).
| Cell Populations in the Bone Marrow | Heterochronic BMT Effects |
|---|---|
| CD11b+Ly6G+ neutrophils | ⊕ * |
| CD11b+Ly6G- monocytes/macrophages | ns |
| B220loCD43+CD19-sIgM-sIgD-prepro-B | ns |
| B220loCD43-CD19+sIgM-sIgD-pre-B | ns |
| B220loCD43+CD19+sIgM-sIgD-pro-B | ns |
| B220loCD43-CD19+sIgM+sIgD-immature B cells | ns |
| B220hiCD43-CD19+sIgM+sIgD+ mature B cells | ns |
| B220+ B cells | ns |
Legend: ⊕ rejuvenating effect, *—p < 0.05, ns—not significant.
Immunophenotyping by flow cytometry (cell source: peritoneal cavity).
| Cell Populations in the Peritoneal Cavity | Heterochronic BMT Effects |
|---|---|
| B220+ B cells | ns |
| B220-CD23+ B2 cells | ⊝ * |
| B220+CD23- B1 cells | ⊝ * |
| B220+CD23-CD11b+CD5+ B1a cells | ⊕ * |
| B220+CD23-CD11b+CD5- B1b cells | ⊕ ** |
Legend: ⊕ rejuvenating effect, ⊝ adverse effect, *—p < 0.05, **—p <0.01, ns—not significant.
In vitro endocytosis evaluation (cell source: spleen).
| In Vitro Endocytosis Evaluationn | Heterochronic BMT Effects |
|---|---|
| CD11b+Ly6G-Ly6Chi inflammatory monocytes | ns |
| CD11b+Ly6G-Ly6C-/lo non-inflammatory monocytes | ns |
| CD11b+Ly6G+ neutrophils | ns |
Legend: ns—not significant.
In vitro cytokine release assay (cell source: spleen).
| In Vitro Cytokine Release Assay, Spleen Cells | Heterochronic BMT Effects |
|---|---|
| IL-6 | ns |
| TNF | ns |
Legend: ns—not significant.
In vitro cytokine release assay (cell source: peritoneal cavity).4285.
| In Vitro Cytokine Release Assay, Peritoneal Cells | Heterochronic BMT Effects |
|---|---|
| IL-6 | ns |
| MCP-1 | ns |
| TNF | ns |
Legend: ns—not significant.
In vitro splenocyte proliferative response (cell source: spleen).
| In Vitro Splenocyte Proliferative Response | Heterochronic BMT Effects |
|---|---|
| PHA | ns |
| PHA+PMA | ⊕ (*) |
Legend: ⊕ rejuvenating effect, (*)—p = 0.056, ns—not significant.
In vivo functional testing.
| In Vivo Immunization | Heterochronic BMT Effects |
|---|---|
| Absorbance at 105 titre | ns |
Legend: ns—not significant.
Figure 2Heatmap of the analyzed parameters. The types of analysis are shown along the right axis, group comparison along the bottom axis. Red results indicate that the result is higher than in the SHAM group, and blue results indicate that the result is lower than in the SHAM group. Numbers in the boxes indicate the factor: 1 means the result is two times higher, and −1 indicates that the result is two times lower. Legend: BMT—transplanted aged mice, SHAM—aged control mice, Y—young control mice, ⊕ rejuvenating effect, ⊝ adverse effect.
Figure 3Frailty index (FI) results are shown in the combined plot. The x-axis shows the age of mice in weeks, the y-axis (left) shows FI (±SD) values, and (right) the number of analyzed mice. Legend: Solid line—BMT—transplanted aged group, dashed line—SHAM—aged control group, ▿—number of evaluated BMT mice, number of evaluated SHAM mice.
Figure 4Results of pathomorphological analyses of the aged mice that received heterochronic BM transplantation (BMT, n = 59) and of the aged control mice (SHAM, n = 38); (a) the percentage of major lesions in different organ systems; (b) the percentage of tumors in different organ systems.
Figure 5Kaplan–Meier survival curves. The equality test showed no significant differences between the transplanted group (BMT) and the control group (SHAM). BMT-censored and SHAM-censored are the mice that died during the transplantation process or were deliberately euthanized for the immune system analyses.