| Literature DB >> 35453418 |
Mónica Paesa1,2, Danielle Pires Nogueira3, Gustavo Velderrain-Rodríguez4,5, Irene Esparza3, Nerea Jiménez-Moreno3, Gracia Mendoza6,7,8, Jesús Osada9,10, Olga Martin-Belloso5, María Jesús Rodríguez-Yoldi8,9, Carmen Ancín-Azpilicueta3.
Abstract
In this study, the total phenolic content, the antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of onion waste extracts were characterized. Some phenolic compounds present in the extracts were also identified and quantified by HPLC-DAD. Additionally, an in-silico analysis was performed to identify the phenolic compounds with the highest intestinal absorption and Caco-2 permeability. The onion extract possessed a high amount of phenolic compounds (177 ± 9 mg/g extract) and had an effective antioxidant capacity measured by ABTS, FRAP and DPPH assays. Regarding the antiproliferative activity, the onion extracts produced cell cycle arrest in the S phase with p53 activation, intrinsic apoptosis (mitochondrial membrane potential modification) and caspase 3 activation. Likewise, onion waste increased intracellular ROS with possible NF-kB activation causing a proteasome down regulation. In addition, the extracts protected the intestine against oxidative stress induced by H2O2. According to the in-silico analysis, these results could be related to the higher Caco-2 permeability to protocatechuic acid. Therefore, this study provides new insights regarding the potential use of these types of extract as functional ingredients with antioxidant and antiproliferative properties and as medicinal agents in diseases related to oxidative stress, such as cancer. In addition, its valorization would contribute to the circular economy.Entities:
Keywords: Allium cepa L. by-products; Caco-2 cells; ROS; circular economy; intestine; protocatechuic acid; vegetable extracts
Year: 2022 PMID: 35453418 PMCID: PMC9032738 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11040733
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1HPLC-UV chromatogram recorded at 254 nm (blue line) and 365 nm (black line) of the extract obtained from onion waste. Peak 1: Protocatechuic acid; Peak 2: Vanillic acid; Peak 3: Unknown flavonoid 1; Peak 4: Ellagic acid; Peak 5: Quercetin 3-glucoside; Peak 6: Unknown flavonoid 2; Peak 7: Unknown flavonoid 3; Peak 8: Quercetin; Peak 9: Kaempferol; Peak 10: Isorhamnetin.
Phenolic composition of extracts obtained from onion household wastes.
| Phenolic Compound | Concentration (mg/g Extract) |
|---|---|
| Protocatechuic acid | 11.5 ± 0.3 |
| Ellagic acid | 0.10 ± 0.01 |
| Vanillic acid | 0.33 ± 0.03 |
| Quercetin | 10.2 ± 0.4 |
| Quercetin 3-glucoside | 1.16 ± 0.08 |
| Kaempferol | 0.44 ± 0.01 |
| Isorhamnetin | 0.24 ± 0.01 |
| Unknown flavonoid 1 1 | 2.57 ± 0.09 |
| Unknown flavonoid 2 1 | 12.3 ± 0.3 |
| Unknown flavonoid 3 1 | 0.87 ± 0.03 |
1 Quantified as quercetin equivalents (mg/g extract).
Antioxidant capacity and total phenolic and flavonoid content of the extracts obtained from onion household wastes.
| Assays | Concentration |
|---|---|
| Antioxidant capacity by ABTS (mmol Trolox/g extract) | 1.11 ± 0.08 |
| Antioxidant capacity by FRAP (mmol Trolox/g extract) | 0.83 ± 0.01 |
| Antioxidant capacity by DPPH (mmol Trolox/g extract) | 0.49 ± 0.08 |
| Total Flavonoids (mg quercetin/g extract) | 64 ± 3 |
| Total Phenolic Content (mg gallic acid/g extract) | 177 ± 9 |
Figure 2Dose-response curve of cell viability in Caco-2 cells at different incubation times (24, 48 and 72 h) and concentrations (0, 62.5, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 μg/mL) with onion waste extracts (**** p < 0.0001).
Figure 3(A). Relative cell cycle phases in Caco-2 cells after 48 h incubation in absence (CTRL) or presence (IC50 = 1000 μg/mL) of onion extracts **** p < 0.0001. (B). Percentage of Caco-2 cells with presence of active p53 after 48 h incubation with onion extract at IC50 (1000 μg/mL). * p < 0.05 vs. CTRL (untreated cells).
Figure 4(A). Percentage of the type of cell death induced on Caco-2 cells after 48 h incubation in CTRL (untreated cells) and onion extract at IC50 (1000 μg/mL) * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. (B). Analysis of mitochondrial membrane potential (∆ψm) after 48 h incubation with onion extract at IC50 ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRL. (C). Percentage of Caco-2 cells with presence of active caspase-3 after 48 h incubation with onion extract at IC50 ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRL.
Figure 5Proteasome 20 S activity in Caco-2 cells after incubation with onion extract at IC50 (1000 μg/mL) for 48 h. **** p < 0.0001 vs. CTRL (untreated cells).
Figure 6Measurements of ROS levels on Caco-2 cells in absence (A) or presence (B) of H2O2 (80 mM, 20 min) after 24 or 48 h incubation with onion extract at IC50 (1000 μg/mL) or ¼ IC50 (250 μg/mL). *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001 vs. CTRL (left) or H2O2 (right).
Figure 7(A) Measurement of cell viability in differentiated Caco-2 cells after incubation with onion extracts at 62.5, 125, 250, 500, 1000 and 2000 μg/mL for 48 h. * p < 0.5; **** p < 0.0001. (B). Measurements of ROS levels on differentiated Caco-2 cells in absence or presence of H2O2 (80 mM, 20 min) after 48 h of incubation with onion extract at IC50 (1000 µg/mL) and 2xIC50 (2000 µg/mL). ## p < 0.01; #### p < 0.0001 vs. H2O2.; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRL.
In-silico study of the phenolic compounds in the onion extracts.
| Identified Compound | MW | TPSA | Log P | No. Atoms | Hydrogen Bonds Acceptors | Hydrogen Bonds Donors | Rotatable Bonds | Molecular Volume (Å3) | Violations to LIRF | % ABS | log Papp (10−6 cm/s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Protocatechuic acid | 154.12 | 77.75 | 0.88 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 127.08 | 0 | 89.15 | 1.15 |
| 2 | Ellagic acid | 302.19 | 141.33 | 0.94 | 22 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 221.78 | 0 | 60.24 | 0.33 |
| 3 | Vanillic acid | 168.15 | 66.76 | 1.19 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 144.61 | 0 | 85.97 | 0.33 |
| 4 | Quercetin | 302.24 | 131.35 | 1.68 | 22 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 240.08 | 0 | 63.68 | −0.23 |
| 5 | Quercetin 3-glucoside | 464.38 | 210.50 | −0.36 | 33 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 372.21 | 2 | 36.38 | 0.24 |
| 6 | Kaempferol | 286.24 | 111.12 | 2.17 | 21 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 232.07 | 0 | 70.66 | 0.03 |
| 7 | Isorhamnetin | 316.26 | 120.36 | 1.99 | 23 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 257.61 | 0 | 67.48 | −0.003 |
| Compounds of matching spectra for the unknown flavonoids | ||||||||||||
| Quercetin 3,7,4′-triglucoside | 788.66 | 368.81 | −4.16 | 55 | 22 | 14 | 0 | 636.45 | 3 | −18.24 | −1.14 | |
| Isorhamnetin 3,4′-diglucoside | 640.55 | 278.66 | −2.07 | 45 | 17 | 10 | 8 | 521.86 | 3 | 12.86 | −1.10 | |
| Quercetin 4’-glucoside | 464.38 | 210.50 | −0.33 | 33 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 372.21 | 2 | 36.38 | 0.27 | |
| Isorhamnetin 4’-glucoside | 478.41 | 199.51 | −0.03 | 34 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 389.73 | 2 | 40.17 | 0.34 | |
| Quercetin 7,4’-diglucoside | 626.52 | 289.65 | −2.12 | 44 | 17 | 11 | 7 | 504.33 | 3 | 9.07 | −1.22 | |
MW = Molecular weight; TPSA = Total polar surface area; LogP = octanol-water partition coefficient, Violations to LIRF=Violations to Lipinski’s rule of five; %ABS = Theoretical absorption percentage; log Papp = logarithm of the apparent permeability coefficient.