| Literature DB >> 35451954 |
Jinyan Yu1,2,3,4, Xiaomeng Xu1,2,3,4, Yu Wang1,2,3,4, Xianyue Zhai1,2,3,4, Zhiming Pan1,2,3,4, Xinan Jiao1,2,3,4, Yunzeng Zhang1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Although Salmonella Derby ST71 strains have been recognized as poultry-specific by previous studies, multiple swine-associated S. Derby ST71 strains were identified in this long-term, multi-site epidemic study. Here, 15 representative swine-associated S. Derby ST71 strains were sequenced and compared with 65 (one swine-associated and 64 poultry-associated) S. Derby ST71 strains available in the NCBI database at a pangenomic level through comparative genomics analysis to identify genomic features related to the differentiation of swine-associated strains and previously reported poultry-associated strains. The distribution patterns of known Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPIs) and virulence factor (VF) encoding genes were not capable of differentiating between the two strain groups. The results demonstrated that the S. Derby ST71 population harbours an open pan-genome, and swine-associated ST71 strains contain many more genes than the poultry-associated strains, mainly attributed to the prophage sequence contents in the genomes. The numbers of prophage sequences identified in the swine-associated strains were higher than those in the poultry-associated strains. Prophages specifically harboured by the swine-associated strains were found to contain genes that facilitate niche adaptation for the bacterial hosts. Gene deletion experiments revealed that the dam gene specifically present in the prophage of the swine-associated strains is important for S. Derby to adhere onto the host cells. This study provides novel insights into the roles of prophages during the genome differentiation of Salmonella.Entities:
Keywords: Salmonella Derby; pan-genome; poultry; prophage; swine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35451954 PMCID: PMC9453062 DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000817
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Genom ISSN: 2057-5858
Fig. 1.Core and pan-genome analyses of S. Derby ST71 strains. (a) Estimation of the S. Derby pan- and core genome size. Rarefaction analysis demonstrates that the average number of gene clusters in the pan-genome increases while the conserved core gene clusters reaches a plateau as more genomes are analysed. (b) Functional distribution comparison between the core and accessory genes of the S. Derby strains. The COG categories with significantly different proportion between the two groups were blue coloured (higher in accessory gene group) or green coloured (higher in core gene group) (Fisher exact test, P<0.05).
Fig. 2.Pangenome and genomic feature analysis of the 80 S. Derby ST71 strains. Left panel, phylogenetic tree reconstructed based on the pangenome gene presence/absence data. The 16 swine-associated strains were grouped together and formed a separate cluster from those poultry-associated strains. Red and blue labelled numbers on the branches of the tree denoted number of gene gain and loss events occurred on the branch. Middle panel, the circles and the strips with different colours denote presence of each of prophage clusters and SPIs, respectively. Right panel, the red squares indicated presence of virulence genes, green coloured ones denote pseudogenes, grey denotes gene absence, white denotes gene presence but with gene length difference.
Fig. 3.Genomic characteristics comparison between swine-associated and poultry-associated strains. Circles represented swine-associated strains, and squares denoted poultry-associated strains. (a) Prophage number comparison between swine-associated and poultry-associated strain groups. (b) Gene number comparison between swine-associated and poultry-associated strain groups, with prophage-originated genes included (solid symbols) or removal (hollow symbols). (c) Whole genome length comparison between swine-associated and poultry-associated strain groups, with prophage-originated genes included (solid symbols) or removal (hollow symbols). (d) GC content comparison between swine-associated and poultry-associated strain groups, with prophage-originated genes included (solid symbols) or removal (hollow symbols).
Fig. 4.(a) The phylogenetic tree reconstructed based on gene presence/absence of the prophage gene families (b) Functional distribution of the prophage gene families. (c) Sequence alignments between the representative prophage sequences (up) and their relatives (top hit from NCBI database) (down). The sequences are aligned using Mauve, and local collinear blocks within each alignment are represented as blocks of similar colour connected with lines.
Fig. 5.(a) Relative intracellular loads at 1 h (adhesion) and 2 h (invasion) post-infection of S. Derby S35 and its mutants Δdam in IPI-2I. The formula for calculating the adhesion/invasion rate of bacteria to cells: (the number of adherent/invading bacteria to cells / initial number of bacteria in the hole)×100 %. (b) Motility assays of WT and deletion mutant strain. Diameter of mobility formula: large circle diameter - small circle diameter. The difference was analysed by P-values from two-tailed Student’s t-test (*P<0.05, P>0.05 not significant).