| Literature DB >> 35451231 |
Erasmus Nikoi Kotey1, Ivy Asantewaa Asante1, Mildred Adusei-Poku1,2, Augustina Arjarquah1, Richard Ampadu3, David Rodgers3, Edward Owusu Nyarko3, William Asiedu3, Courage Dafeamekpor3, Michael R Wiley4, Gifty Mawuli1, Richard Asomadu Obeng1, Stephen Ofori Nyarko1, Vanessa Magnusen1, Emmanuel Kodua1, Naiki Attram2, Shirley Cameron Nimo-Paintsil5, Catherine Pratt4, Anne T Fox5, Andrew Letizia5, William Kwabena Ampofo1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Avian influenza viruses (AIV) cause significant economic losses to poultry farmers worldwide. These viruses have the ability to spread rapidly, infect entire poultry flocks, and can pose a threat to human health. The National Influenza Centre (NIC) at the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research in collaboration with the Ghana Armed forces (GAF) and the U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, Ghana Detachment (NAMRU-3) performs biannual surveillance for influenza viruses among poultry at military barracks throughout Ghana. This study presents poultry surveillance data from the years 2017 to 2019.Entities:
Keywords: Ghana; H9N2; backyard poultry; military
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35451231 PMCID: PMC9297761 DOI: 10.1002/vms3.809
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med Sci ISSN: 2053-1095
FIGURE 1Map of Ghana showing locations of affected poultry farms. Black stars indicate sites in the five regions where tracheal and/or cloacal swabs from poultry tested positive for influenza A (H9N2)
Description of influenza A (H9N2)‐infected birds, barracks sources, PCR and results of sequencing
| CDC PCR protocols | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year/ID | Animal | Specimen | Health status | Barracks, region | Type | Subtype | Segment sequenced |
| 17/148 | Guinea fowl | Tracheal/cloacal | Healthy | 66‐Artillery, Volta | A | H9 | 1–8 |
| 18/266 | Chicken | Tracheal/cloacal | Healthy | 3rd Infantry Battalion (3 BN), Brong Ahafo | A | H9 | 1–8 |
| 18/272 | Chicken | Tracheal/cloacal | Healthy | 3rd Infantry Battalion (3 BN), Brong Ahafo | A | H9 | 1–8 |
| 18/273 | Chicken | Tracheal/cloacal | Sick | 3rd Infantry Battalion (3 BN), Brong Ahafo | A | H9 | 1–8 |
| 19/17 | Chicken | Tracheal/cloacal | Sick | Eastern Naval Command (ENC), Tema | A | H9 | 1–8 |
| 19/21 | Chicken | Tracheal/cloacal | Sick | Eastern Naval Command (ENC), Tema | A | H9 | 1–8 |
| 19/22 | Chicken | Tracheal/cloacal | Healthy | Eastern Naval Command (ENC), Tema | A | H9 | 1–8 |
| 19/206 | Chicken | Tracheal/cloacal | Healthy | Western Naval Command (WNC), Sekondi | A | H9 | 1–8 |
| 19/207 | Chicken | Tracheal/cloacal | Healthy | Western Naval Command (WNC), Sekondi | A | H9 | 1–8 |
| 19/239 | Guinea fowl | Tracheal/cloacal | Healthy | 4th Infantry Battalion (4 BN), Ashanti | A | H9 | 1–8 |
| 19/255 | Chicken | Tracheal/cloacal | Sick | Central Command Barracks, Ashanti | A | H9 | 1, 5 and 7 |
FIGURE 2Phylogenetic analysis of influenza A (H9N2) haemagglutinin (HA). Viruses detected in this surveillance are indicated with bold fonts on the phylogenetic tree. This analysis factored several hits after BLAST and the rest of the sequences were clade‐specific reference sequences selected from the GISAID database. Clustering analysis indicates a close relationship among our samples and those earlier reported in Ghana and the strains purported to have originated from the Burkina Faso
Genetic characterization of influenza A (H9N2) viruses detected in Military barracks
| Description | Segment (molecular marker) | Samples | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019/17 | 2019/21 | 2019/22 | 2019/206 | 2019/207 | 2019/239 | 2019/255 | 2018/266 | 2018/272 | 2018/273 | 2017/148 | ||
| Molecular determinants of virulence | PB2 (147V) | S | O | O | P | O | O | O | O | O | S | S |
| PA (127V, 550L, 672L) | P | P | P | P | P | P | N | P | P | P | P | |
| Pathotype based on HA cleavage site motif | HA ((R/KSSR*GLF)/ R/KRSR*GLF (335–341) | RSSR*GLF | RSSR*GLF | RSSR*GLF | RSSR*GLF | RSSR*GLF | RSSR*GLF | N | RSSR*GLF | RSSR*GLF | RSSR*GLF | RSSR*GLF |
| Molecular determinants of host specificity (adaptation to mammals) | PB2 (318R, 590S, 661T) | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P |
| PB2 (185I) | P | O | O | P | O | O | O | O | O | P | P | |
| PB1 (13P) | P | P | P | P | P | P | N | P | P | P | P | |
| PA (100I, 312R, 409N, 291S) | P | P | P | P | P | P | N | P | P | P | P | |
| #HA (155T, 158N, 183N, 226L and 391K) | P | P | P | P | P | P | N | P | P | P | P | |
| NP (372D) | P | P | P | P | P | P | N | P | P | P | P | |
| M (15I, 154I, 215A) | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | |
| Human‐to‐human transmission markers | PB2 (105) | P | O | P | P | O | P | O | O | O | P | P |
Note: S = I substitution; O = partially sequenced regions with no base calls; *HA cleavage site: H9 numbering was used to assess all markers, except #HA, which denotes H3 numbering; P = present; and N = segment could not be sequenced.