| Literature DB >> 35449947 |
Achille Parfait Nwakiban Atchan1, Shilpa Talkad Shivashankara2, Stefano Piazza3, Armelle Deutou Tchamgoue4, Giangiacomo Beretta5, Mario Dell'Agli3, Paolo Magni3,6, Gabriel Agbor Agbor4, Jules-Roger Kuiaté1, Uma Venkateswaran Manjappara2.
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome is a complex condition associated with a series of pathologies featuring glucose intolerance, diabetes, high blood pressure, dyslipidemia, microalbuminuria, overweight, and obesity. It is also related to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), recognized as the most familiar cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. The overall prevalence of metabolic syndrome and, consequently, the one of NAFLD is constantly increasing worldwide. The initial management of these diseases involves lifestyle modifications, including changes in diet and physical exercise. In addition to conventional drugs like orlistat, botanicals are traditionally used to counteract these disorders, and some of them are currently under evaluation. The present work evaluated the in vivo beneficial effects of hydroalcoholic extracts of two Cameroonian spices, focusing on obesity-related hepatic lipid injury in high-fat-fed C57BL/6 mice. Hydroethanolic extracts were prepared and characterized by reverse phase-high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-photodiode array detection and ultra performance liquid chromatography-triple time-of-flight electrospray ionization tandem mass spectroscopy (TOF-ESI-MS/MS) analysis. Plant extracts were orally administered for 30 days at different dose levels (100 and 200 mg kg-1 body weight (BW)) to obese C57BL/6 mice. Food intake (FI) and BW were recorded daily. Plasma biochemical parameters and lipid content were estimated at the beginning and at the end of the experiment. Liver tissues were subjected to histological examinations, lipid content, as well as oxidative stress markers, and FAME (fatty acid methyl esters) were estimated. Oral administration of extracts at 200 mg kg-1 BW significantly reduced FI and prevented BW gain. A decrease in the weight of the liver and a decrease in the hepatic and plasma lipid content were observed. Plasma enzyme (serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, SGOT; serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase, SGPT; alkaline phosphatase, ALP) activities were not indicative of any organ damage. Chemical analysis suggested that phenolic acids (4-caffeoylquinic acid, p-coumaric acid 4-O-glucoside, 5-caffeoylshikimic acid, caffeic acid hexose, and 4-O-methyl gallic acid) and flavonoids (morusin derivatives, naringenin-7-O-glucoside, and homoisoflavanone) identified in the extracts could potentially justify the biological properties observed. The main findings of this study showed that Xylopia parviflora (A. Rich.) Benth and Aframomum citratum (Pereira ex Oliv. et Hanb.) K. Shum decreased hepatic lipid accumulation in high-fat-diet (HFD)-induced obese C57BL/6 mice and confirmed, at least in part, our previous in vitro and ex vivo studies. The molecular mechanisms underlying these effects are still unclear and will be explored in the future.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35449947 PMCID: PMC9016817 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c00050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Effect of spice extracts on BW and FI in high-fat diet-induced obesity in C57BL/6 mice. (A) BW and (B) FI. Values represent the mean ± SD. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, and ###p < 0.001 vs the HFD group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 vs ND group. ND, normal diet; HFD, high-fat diet; ORL, orlistat; XP, Xylopia parviflora; and AC, Aframomum citratum.
Effect of Spice Extracts on Glucose, Lipid, and Protein Plasma Biochemical Parameters in DIO-C57BL/6 Mice Post- and Pretreatmenta
| groups of mice | ND | HFD | HFD + ORL50 | HFD + XP100 | HFD + XP200 | HFD + AC100 | HFD + AC200 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| glucose (mg/dL) | AHFDIO | 170.6 ± 10.17 | 240.9 ± 13.94* | |||||
| A30DT | 150.9 ± 14.33 | 243.7 ± 9.38*** | 191.10 ± 10.33***### | 235.50 ± 15.41*** | 175 ± 7.90### | 214.10 ± 14.35*** ## | 166.30 ± 16.30### | |
| triglycerides (mg/dL) | AHFDIO | 21.84 ± 2.11 | 22.39 ± 2.28 | |||||
| A30DT | 31.96 ± 2.48 | 59.91 ± 8.37*** | 54.82 ± 8.45*** | 56.74 ± 11.96*** | 41.39 ± 8.75# | 44.14 ± 3.42 | 42.03 ± 8.76# | |
| total cholesterol (mg/dL) | AHFDIO | 66.07 ± 7.33 | 179.40 ± 9.79*** | |||||
| A30DT | 75.71 ± 7.50 | 192.80 ± 13.09*** | 147.60 ± 16.36***### | 183.60 ± 15.77*** | 126.70 ± 14.83***### | 147.60 ± 11.02***### | 144.70 ± 17.48***### | |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | AHFDIO | 61.71 ± 6.29 | 142 ± 15.05*** | |||||
| A30DT | 68.48 ± 5.25 | 147.80 ± 5.39*** | 110 ± 12.66***### | 140.40 ± 16.95*** | 100.90 ± 10.82***### | 137 ± 12.25*** | 117.20 ± 7.38***### | |
| total protein (g/dL) | A30DT | 5.63 ± 0.47 | 5.87 ± 0.63 | 5.98 ± 0.27 | 5.73 ± 0.32 | 5.53 ± 0.19 | 5.46 ± 0.22 | 5.98 ± 0.26 |
The values represent the mean ± SD. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, and ###p < 0.001 vs the HFD group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 vs ND group. HFDIO, high-fat-diet-induced obese; AHFDIO, after high-fat diet-induced obesity; A30DT, after 30 days of treatment; ND, normal diet; HFD, high-fat diet; ORL, orlistat; XP, Xylopia parviflora; and AC, Aframomum citratum.
Figure 2Effect of spice extracts on liver lipid contents. (A) Effect of spice extracts on triglyceride contents. (B) Effect of spice extracts on cholesterol contents. (C) Effect of spice extracts on the total FFA contents. Values represent the mean ± SD. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, and ###p < 0.001 vs the HFD group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 vs the ND group. HFD, high-fat diet.
Fatty Acid Profile of Liver Fat from Different Experimental Groups after 30 Days of Treatmenta
| groups of mice | ND | HFD | HFD + ORL50 | HFD + XP100 | HFD + XP200 | HFD + AC100 | HFD + AC200 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| group of fatty acids | amount of fatty acids in one milligram of total fatty acid extracted from liver fat (%) | ||||||
| C14:0 | 0.51 ± 0.00 | 0.66 ± 0.02 | 0.67 ± 0.00 | 0.54 ± 0.01 | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 0.50 ± 0.00 | 0.00 |
| C15:0 | 0.00 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.08 ± 0.00 | 0.00 |
| C16:0 | 26.32 ± 1.11 | 28.12 ± 0.07 | 29.24 ± 0.90 | 28.45 ± 0.05 | 23.19 ± 0.34*### | 27.66 ± 0.38 | 27.04 ± 0.39 |
| C16:1 | 5.64 ± 0.20 | 5.30 ± 0.01 | 3.59 ± 0.04 | 4.04 ± 0.03 | 4.54 ± 0.01 | 3.84 ± 0.07 | 3.60 ± 0.23 |
| C18:0 | 7.41 ± 0.57 | 4.92 ± 0.07 | 7.47 ± 0.00 | 4.75 ± 0.19 | 5.69 ± 0.23 | 5.86 ± 0.09 | 6.65 ± 0.11 |
| C18:1 | 42.32 ± 2.54 | 42.45 ± 0.18 | 40.75 ± 1.09 | 42.04 ± 0.41 | 44.74 ± 0.47 | 39.11 ± 0.68*# | 40.57 ± 0.68 |
| C18:2 | 12.48 ± 0.46 | 13.07 ± 0.12 | 14.20 ± 0.20 | 15.49 ± 0.01* | 15.19 ± 0.05 | 14.70 ± 0.15 | 15.69 ± 0.26 |
| C18:3 | 0.00 | 0.24 ± 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.13 ± 0.00 | 0.00 |
| C20:1 | 0.00 | 0.63 ± 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.54 ± 0.01 | 0.00 |
| C20:3 | 0.00 | 0.49 ± 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.49 ± 0.02 | 0.00 |
| C20:4 | 5.58 ± 0.18 | 3.99 ± 0.08 | 4.04 ± 0.04 | 4.63 ± 0.24 | 6.03 ± 0.01 | 7.03 ± 0.06# | 6.42 ± 0.09 |
The values represent the mean ± SD. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, and ###p < 0.001 vs the HFD group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 vs ND group. HFD, high-fat diet; ND, normal diet; HFD, high-fat diet; ORL, orlistat; XP, Xylopia parviflora; and AC, Aframomum citratum.
Figure 3Effect of spice extracts on the liver-saturated/-unsaturated free fatty and lipid droplet formation in HFD-induced obesity in C57BL/6 mice. (A) Effect of spice extracts on saturated and unsaturated fatty acid content in liver tissues of different animal groups after 30 days of treatment. (B) Effect of spice extracts on liver steatosis. The values represent the mean ± SD. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, and ###p < 0.001 vs the HFD group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 vs ND group. HFD: high-fat diet.
Figure 4Histological study of liver tissue. Representative microscopic images of liver sections of mice obtained from different treatment groups. The liver sections were stained with H&E, and the magnification was 100. Microscopic examination of (A) Normal group (ND), (B) HFD-fed mice group, (C) HFD-fed + orlistat (50 mg·kg–1 BW) (D&E) HFD + XP (D:100 mg·kg–1 BW and E: 200 mg·kg–1 BW) and (F&G) AC (F:100 mg·kg–1 BW and G: 200 mg·kg–1 BW) treated groups. ND, Normal diet; HFD, High-fat diet; XP, Xylopia parviflora; AC, Aframomum citratum.
Effect of Spice Extracts on Liver Antioxidant Enzyme Activities and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in DIO-C57BL/6 Mice Post-Treatmenta
| groups of mice | ND | HFD | HFD + ORL50 | HFD + XP100 | HFD + XP200 | HFD + AC100 | HFD + AC200 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| parameters | Antioxidant enzyme activities and total protein content | ||||||
| SOD (UI/mg Protein) | 1.23 ± 0.15 | 0.63 ± 0.07*** | 1.47 ± 0.07* ### | 1.09 ± 0.07### | 1.11 ± 0.18### | 1.08 ± 0.09### | 1.2 ± 0.07### |
| CAT (UI/mg Protein) | 0.11 ± 0.17 | 0.07 ± 0.00* | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.04** | 0.17 ± 0.03**## | 0.06 ± 2.03** | 0.09 ± 0.90 |
| GST (nmol/min/mg Protein) | 12.62 ± 3.33 | 2.93 ± 7.66** | 13.24 ± 2.53## | 4.01 ± 1.09 | 11.85 ± 3.57## | 9.68 ± 6.39# | 13.01 ± 9.01## |
| protein (mg/mL) | 5.03 ± 1.59 | 5.09 ± 2.022 | 4.73 ± 0.62 | 4.52 ± 0.89 | 4.01 ± 0.21 | 4.05 ± 0.90 | 5.18 ± 0.95 |
| Oxidative stress biomarkers | |||||||
| LPO (nmol of TBARS/mg Protein) | 0.25 ± 0.06 | 0.54 ± 0.07*** | 0.36 ± 0.05# | 0.29 ± 0.05### | 0.29 ± 0.04### | 0.26 ± 0.02### | 0.23 ± 0.03### |
| protein carbonyl (nmol/mg Protein) | 1.42 ± 0.25 | 4.84 ± 0.14*** | 2.71 ± 0.53### | 3.61 ± 0.75** | 2.59 ± 1.08## | 3.44 ± 0.90** | 2.99 ± 0.85*## |
| nitric oxide (nmol/mg Protein) | 0.65 ± 0.11 | 0.59 ± 0.16 | 0.61 ± 0.07 | 0.68 ± 0.07 | 0.68 ± 0.28 | 0.55 ± 0.04 | 0.49 ± 0.22 |
| ROS Level (% vs HFD) | 34.56 ± 6.36 | 100 ± 9.71*** | 44.90 ± 3.10*### | 70.07 ± 3.55***### | 57.14 ± 3.36***### | 45 ± 5.39*### | 41.09 ± 2.86### |
The values represent the mean ± SD. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, and ###p < 0.001 vs the HFD group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 vs ND group. ND, normal diet; HFDIO, high-fat-diet-induced obesity; HFD, high-fat diet; ORL, orlistat; XP, Xylopia parviflora; AC, Aframomum citratum; SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase GST, glutathion-S-transferase; LPO, lipid peroxidation; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substance assay; and ROS, reactive oxygen species.
Figure 5Representative RP-HPLC-PDA chromatogram of spice extracts at 280/320 nm. (A) Xylopia parviflora, (B) Aframomum citratum. (C) Compounds identified (1a: 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid, 1b/2c: p-coumaric acid 4-O-glucoside, 1c: 5-O-caffeoylshikimic acid, 2a: 4-O-methylgallic acid, 2b: morusin, 2d: morusin derivative, 2e: naringenin-7-O-glucoside, 2f: caffeic acid-hexose, and 2g: 5,3,4′-trihydroxy-7-methoxy-8-methyl homoisoflavanone).
Identification of Polyphenol Compounds in Hydro-Ethanolic Extracts through Direct ESI-MS/MS Analysis
| peak | RT (min) | Λmax (nm) | precursor ion ( | fragment ions ESI-MS2 (% base peak) | formula | tentative identification (references) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| polyphenol fractions from | ||||||
| 5.46 | 280, 320 | [M – H]−: 353.1 | 191.0436 (100), 135.0346 (50), 179.0231 (49), 353.0708 (10), 161.0131 (5), 171.0179 (2) | C16H18O9 | 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid[ | |
| 10.05 | 280, 320 | [M – H]−: 325.2 | 325.1698 (100), 183.0000 (90), 184.0070 (8), 119.0405 (6), 197.0153 (4), 239.0614 (2) | C15H18O8 | ||
| 12.58 | 280, 320 | [M – H]−: 335.1 | 135.0304 (100), 179.0153 (75), 161.0070 (30), 335.0397 (17), 227.1758 (12), 133.0153 (5) | C16H16O8 | 5-O-caffeoylshikimic acid[ | |
| polyphenol fractions from | ||||||
| 13.26 | 280, 320 | [M – H]−: 183.0 | 168.9883 (100), 138.9895 (45), 139.9964 (27), 165.9728 (25), 183.0102 (7), 166.9802 (5) | C8H8O5 | 4- | |
| 24.43 | 280, 320 | [M – H]−: 419.1 | 419.0892 (100), 197.0243 (78), 182.0025 (55), 139.0250 (37), 180.9949 (22), 179.0156 (10) | C25H24O6 | morusin[ | |
| 25.25 | 280, 320 | [M – H]−: 325.2 | 325.1694 (100), 183.0000 (90), 197.0146 (9), 119.0402 (7), 184.0079 (8), 225.0426 (4) | C15H18O8 | ||
| 34.29 | 280, 320 | [M – H]−: 419.1 | 419.1187 (100), 197.0327 (55), 182.0098 (33), 181.0025 (25), 125.0138 (24), 164.0005 (12) | C25H24O6 | morusin derivative[ | |
| 35.12 | 280, 320 | [M – H]−: 433.1 | 151.9999 (100), 269.0310 (95), 433.0966 (70), 259.0471 (40), 287.0404 (38), 286.0331 (14) | C21H22O10 | naringenin-7-O-glucoside[ | |
| 42.5 | 280, 320 | [M – H]−: 341.1 | 89.0160 (100), 59.0085 (90), 341.0941 (80), 119.0256 (60), 179.0444 (53), 206.8386 (33) | C15H18O9 | caffeic acid hexose[ | |
| 44.12 | 280, 320 | [M – H]−: 329.2 | 329.1975 (100), 171.0839 (40), 211.1107 (35), 139.0973 (22), 229.1196 (20), 139.0973 (18) | homoisoflavonoid
derivative[ | ||
Scheme 1Proposed Mechanism of the Action of the Hydroethanolic Extracts of X. parviflora and A. citratum