| Literature DB >> 35449865 |
Haiyu Jiang1, Haihong Li2, Zheng Wang1, Xiaomei Xia1, Qinglun Su1, Jinya Ma1.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the effect of early cognitive training combined with aerobic exercise on quality of life (QOL) and cognitive function recovery of patients with poststroke cognitive impairment (PSCI).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35449865 PMCID: PMC9018192 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9891192
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 3.822
Between-group comparison of baseline data.
| Item | EG ( | CG ( | x2/ |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.047 | 0.829 | ||
| Male | 28 (62.22%) | 27 (60.00%) | ||
| Female | 17 (37.78%) | 18 (40.00%) | ||
| Age ( | 58.00 ± 3.13 | 58.11 ± 2.56 | 0.182 | 0.856 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.58 ± 0.62 | 20.59 ± 0.58 | 0.079 | 0.937 |
| Course of disease ( | 20.71 ± 3.53 | 20.31 ± 2.65 | 0.608 | 0.545 |
| Type of stroke | 0.046 | 0.830 | ||
| Cerebral hemorrhage | 27 (60.00%) | 26 (57.78%) | ||
| Cerebral infarction | 18 (40.00%) | 19 (42.22%) | ||
| Complication | 0.045 | 0.833 | ||
| Hypertension | 21 (46.67%) | 22 (48.89%) | ||
| Diabetes mellitus | 24 (53.33%) | 23 (51.11%) | ||
| Disease site | 0.045 | 0.832 | ||
| Hemiplegia on the left side | 25 (55.56%) | 24 (53.33%) | ||
| Hemiplegia on the right side | 20 (44.44%) | 21 (46.67%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Educational degree | ||||
|
| ||||
| Primary school and junior high school | 17 (37.78%) | 19 (42.22%) | 0.185 | 0.667 |
| Senior high school and junior college | 14 (31.11%) | 15 (33.33%) | 0.051 | 0.822 |
| College and above | 14 (31.11%) | 11 (24.44%) | 0.499 | 0.480 |
| Religious faith | 0.053 | 0.818 | ||
| Yes | 14 (31.11%) | 13 (28.89%) | ||
| No | 31 (68.89%) | 32 (71.11%) | ||
| Family income | 0.067 | 0.796 | ||
| ≥3,000 yuan/(month·person) | 35 (77.78%) | 36 (80.00%) | ||
| <3,000 yuan/(month·person) | 10 (22.22%) | 9 (20.00%) | ||
| Place of residence | 0.047 | 0.829 | ||
| Urban area | 27 (60.00%) | 28 (62.22%) | ||
| Rural area | 18 (40.00%) | 17 (37.78%) | ||
Figure 1Between-group comparison of SS-QOL scores after intervention ( ± s).
Between-group comparison of MoCA scores after intervention ( ± s).
| Group |
| MoCA score |
|---|---|---|
| EG | 45 | 28.77 ± 1.44 |
| CG | 45 | 21.13 ± 1.52 |
| t | 24.477 | |
| P | <0.001 |
Figure 2Between-group comparison of BI scores after intervention ( ± s).
Between-group comparison of TMT-A and TMT-B results ( ± s).
| Group | n | TMT-A (s) | TMT-B (s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| EG | 45 | 138.04 ± 46.88 | 172.01 ± 89.01 |
| CG | 45 | 178.95 ± 43.76 | 259.74 ± 97.13 |
| t | 4.279 | 4.467 | |
| P | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 3Between-group comparison of FIM scores after intervention ( ± s).