Literature DB >> 35449457

Eukaryogenesis and oxygen in Earth history.

Daniel B Mills1,2,3, Richard A Boyle4, Stuart J Daines4, Erik A Sperling5, Davide Pisani6,7, Philip C J Donoghue6, Timothy M Lenton4.   

Abstract

The endosymbiotic origin of mitochondria during eukaryogenesis has long been viewed as an adaptive response to the oxygenation of Earth's surface environment, presuming a fundamentally aerobic lifestyle for the free-living bacterial ancestors of mitochondria. This oxygen-centric view has been robustly challenged by recent advances in the Earth and life sciences. While the permanent oxygenation of the atmosphere above trace concentrations is now thought to have occurred 2.2 billion years ago, large parts of the deep ocean remained anoxic until less than 0.5 billion years ago. Neither fossils nor molecular clocks correlate the origin of mitochondria, or eukaryogenesis more broadly, to either of these planetary redox transitions. Instead, mitochondria-bearing eukaryotes are consistently dated to between these two oxygenation events, during an interval of pervasive deep-sea anoxia and variable surface-water oxygenation. The discovery and cultivation of the Asgard archaea has reinforced metabolic evidence that eukaryogenesis was initially mediated by syntrophic H2 exchange between an archaeal host and an α-proteobacterial symbiont living under anoxia. Together, these results temporally, spatially and metabolically decouple the earliest stages of eukaryogenesis from the oxygen content of the surface ocean and atmosphere. Rather than reflecting the ancestral metabolic state, obligate aerobiosis in eukaryotes is most probably derived, having only become globally widespread over the past 1 billion years as atmospheric oxygen approached modern levels.
© 2022. Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35449457     DOI: 10.1038/s41559-022-01733-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2397-334X            Impact factor:   19.100


  114 in total

1.  On the origin of mitosing cells

Authors:  L Sagan
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 2.  Biochemistry and evolution of anaerobic energy metabolism in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Miklós Müller; Marek Mentel; Jaap J van Hellemond; Katrin Henze; Christian Woehle; Sven B Gould; Re-Young Yu; Mark van der Giezen; Aloysius G M Tielens; William F Martin
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  The hydrogen hypothesis for the first eukaryote.

Authors:  W Martin; M Müller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Physiology, anaerobes, and the origin of mitosing cells 50 years on.

Authors:  William F Martin
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 5.  Microbial syntrophy: interaction for the common good.

Authors:  Brandon E L Morris; Ruth Henneberger; Harald Huber; Christine Moissl-Eichinger
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 16.408

6.  Lokiarchaeon is hydrogen dependent.

Authors:  Filipa L Sousa; Sinje Neukirchen; John F Allen; Nick Lane; William F Martin
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 17.745

7.  Symbiosis between methanogenic archaea and delta-proteobacteria as the origin of eukaryotes: the syntrophic hypothesis

Authors: 
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Proposal of the reverse flow model for the origin of the eukaryotic cell based on comparative analyses of Asgard archaeal metabolism.

Authors:  Anja Spang; Courtney W Stairs; Nina Dombrowski; Laura Eme; Jonathan Lombard; Eva F Caceres; Chris Greening; Brett J Baker; Thijs J G Ettema
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 17.745

9.  Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

Authors:  Anja Spang; Jimmy H Saw; Steffen L Jørgensen; Katarzyna Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka; Joran Martijn; Anders E Lind; Roel van Eijk; Christa Schleper; Lionel Guy; Thijs J G Ettema
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Isolation of an archaeon at the prokaryote-eukaryote interface.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Imachi; Masaru K Nobu; Nozomi Nakahara; Yuki Morono; Miyuki Ogawara; Yoshihiro Takaki; Yoshinori Takano; Katsuyuki Uematsu; Tetsuro Ikuta; Motoo Ito; Yohei Matsui; Masayuki Miyazaki; Kazuyoshi Murata; Yumi Saito; Sanae Sakai; Chihong Song; Eiji Tasumi; Yuko Yamanaka; Takashi Yamaguchi; Yoichi Kamagata; Hideyuki Tamaki; Ken Takai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 69.504

View more
  3 in total

1.  A case for an active eukaryotic marine biosphere during the Proterozoic era.

Authors:  Lisa K Eckford-Soper; Ken H Andersen; Trine Frisbæk Hansen; Donald E Canfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Ancestral State Reconstructions Trace Mitochondria But Not Phagocytosis to the Last Eukaryotic Common Ancestor.

Authors:  Nico Bremer; Fernando D K Tria; Josip Skejo; Sriram G Garg; William F Martin
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.065

3.  Delineating transitions during the evolution of specialised peroxisomes: Glycosome formation in kinetoplastid and diplonemid protists.

Authors:  Diego Andrade-Alviárez; Alejandro D Bonive-Boscan; Ana J Cáceres; Wilfredo Quiñones; Melisa Gualdrón-López; Michael L Ginger; Paul A M Michels
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-09-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.