| Literature DB >> 35449343 |
Teodor Svedung Wettervik1, Henrik Engquist2, Anders Hånell3, Timothy Howells3, Elham Rostami3, Elisabeth Ronne-Engström3, Anders Lewén3, Per Enblad3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The primary aim was to determine to what extent continuously monitored neurointensive care unit (neuro-ICU) targets predict cerebral blood flow (CBF) and delivery of oxygen (CDO2) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The secondary aim was to determine whether CBF and CDO2 were associated with clinical outcome.Entities:
Keywords: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage; Cerebral blood flow; Cerebral oxygen delivery (cerebral pressure autoregulation); Clinical outcome; Xenon-enhanced computed tomography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35449343 PMCID: PMC9283361 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-022-01496-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurocrit Care ISSN: 1541-6933 Impact factor: 3.532
Fig. 1CBF measurements in two patients. The figure demonstrates two Xe-CT scans of two different patients. Patient 1 (a, b) exhibits extensive hypoperfusion particularly in the left hemisphere, whereas patient 2 (c, d) exhibits more normal CBF. CBF, cerebral blood flow, Xe-CT, xenon-enhanced computed tomography
Systemic and cerebral physiological variables at the time point of xenon-enhanced computed tomography scans in the early phase and vasospasm phase
| Parameter | Early phase ( | Vasospasm phase ( |
|---|---|---|
| pO2, median (IQR) (kPa) | 13 (12 to 15) | 13 (12 to 15) |
| pCO2, median (IQR) (kPa) | 5.3 (4.9 to 5.7) | 5.5 (5.2 to 5.9) |
| Hematocrit, median (IQR) (%) | 34 (32 to 36) | 33 (31 to 35) |
| HHH-therapy at the time of Xe-CT, | 2 (3) | 19 (16) |
| Vasopressor at the time of Xe-CT, | 24 (32) | 37 (31) |
| ICP, median (IQR) (mm Hg) | 15 (13 to 18) | 14 (10 to 16) |
| CPP, median (IQR) (mm Hg) | 75 (69 to 80) | 77 (70 to 85) |
| ∆CPPopt, median (IQR) (mm Hg) | − 3 (− 10 to 7) | − 3 (− 8 to 6) |
| PRx (coefficient), median (IQR) | 0.11 (0.02 to 0.23) | 0.14 (0.01 to 0.27) |
| Body temperature, median (IQR) (°C) | 37.5 (37.2 to 37.8) | 38.1 (37.8 to 38.5) |
| PTT, median (IQR) (ms) | 38 (28 to 48) | 35 (24 to 43) |
| CBF, median (IQR) (mL/100 g/min) | 33 (27 to 40) | 35 (27 to 44) |
| Cerebral hypoperfusion, median (IQR) (%) | 15 (6 to 39) | 13 (3 to 28) |
| Critical cerebral hypoperfusion, median (IQR) (%) | 1 (0 to 6) | 0 (0 to 5) |
| CDO2, median (IQR) (mL O2/100 g/min) | 5.1 (3.8 to 5.9) | 5.0 (3.9 to 6.1) |
| Poor CDO2, median (IQR) (%) | 31 (12 to 51) | 29 (12 to 50) |
| Severe CDO2, median (IQR) (%) | 3 (0 to 14) | 3 (0 to 9) |
Cerebral hypoperfusion and critical cerebral hypoperfusion were defined as the percentage of brain areas with CBF < 20 mL/100 g/min and and CBF < 10 mL/100 g/min, respectively. Poor and severe CDO2 were defined as CDO2 < 3.81 mL O2/100 g/min and CDO2 < 1.90 mL O2/100 g/min, respectively
CBF, cerebral blood flow, CDO2, cerebral delivery of oxygen, CPP, cerebral perfusion pressure, ∆CPPopt, CPP minus optimal cerebral perfusion pressure, HHH, hemodilution, hypertension, and hypervolemia, ICP, intracranial pressure, IQR, interquartile range, pO2, partial pressure of oxygen, PRx, pressure reactivity index, PTT, pulse transit time, Xe-CT, xenon-enhanced computed tomography
Clinical and physiological predictors of cerebral blood flow and hypoperfusion in the early phase and vasospasm phase: Spearman rank correlation analysis
| Variables | Early phase (day 1–3) | Vasospasm phase (day 4–14) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBF | Hypoperfusion | Critical hypoperfuson | CDO2 | Poor CDO2 | Severe CDO2 | CBF | Hypoperfuson | Critical hypoperfusion | CDO2 | Poor CDO2 | Severe CDO2 | |
| Age | − 0.21 | 0.13 | − 0.01 | 0.12 | − 0.14 | 0.13 | ||||||
| WFNS | − 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | − 0.04 | − 0.04 | 0.04 | − 0.11 | − 0.01 | − 0.10 | − 0.05 | − 0.01 | − 0.06 |
| Fisher | − 0.08 | 0.08 | − 0.02 | − 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.04 | − 0.08 | 0.02 | − 0.02 | − 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| PTT | 0.11 | − 0.11 | − 0.16 | 0.14 | − 0.3 | − 0.13 | 0.15 | − | ||||
| pO2 | 0.09 | − 0.10 | − 0.09 | 0.10 | − 0.09 | − 0.08 | − 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.08 | − 0.02 | 0.08 |
| pCO2 | − 0.22 | − 0.18 | 0.24 | − 0.18 | − 0.19 | 0.10 | − 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.06 | − 0.08 | 0.03 | |
| Hematocrit | − 0.24 | 0.15 | − 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.07 | − 0.08 | − 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.18 | |||
| ICP | 0.21 | − 0.19 | − 0.08 | 0.17 | − 0.17 | − 0.06 | 0.09 | − 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | − 0.04 | − 0.03 |
| CPPa | − 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.04 | − 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.05 | − 0.01 | − 0.01 |
| ∆CPPopt | − 0.09 | − 0.04 | − 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.19 | − 0.17 | |||
| PRx | − 0.01 | 0.12 | − 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.06 | − 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.13 | − 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.07 | |
| Body temperature | − 0.22 | − 0.23 | 0.18 | − 0.14 | 0.19 | − 0.16 | ||||||
Hypoperfusion and critical hypoperfusion were defined as the percentage of brain areas with CBF < 20 mL/100 g/min and and CBF < 10 mL/100 g/min, respectively. Poor and severe CDO2 were defined as CDO2 < 3.81 mL O2/100 g/min and CDO2 < 1.90 mL O2/100 g/min, respectively. The table indicates the r-values of the Spearman correlation analyses
CBF, cerebral blood flow, CDO2, cerebral delivery of oxygen, CPP, cerebral perfusion pressure, CPPopt, optimal CPP, ∆CPPopt, CPP – CPPopt, HHH, hemodilution, hypertension, and hypervolemia, ICP, intracranial pressure, pO2, partial pressure of oxygen, pCO2, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, PRx, pressure reactivity index, PTT, pulse transit time, WFNS, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Bold values indicate statistical significance
aExclusion of those patients with HHH therapy did not influence the results
Predictors of cerebral blood flow and oxygen delivery in the early phase and the vasospasm phase: multiple linear regression analyses
| Variables | Early phase | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBF | CDO2 | |||
| Age | − 0.16 | 0.20 | − 0.19 | 0.11 |
| pCO2 | 0.14 | 0.25 | 0.12 | 0.32 |
| PRx | 0.00 | 0.99 | − 0.09 | 0.46 |
| Body temperature | 0.31 | 0.34 | ||
Early phase: CBF, R2 = 0.17, ANOVA p value = 0.02, and n = 63. CDO2, R2 = 0.22, ANOVA p value = 0.005, and n = 63. Vasospasm phase: CBF, R2 = 0.30, ANOVA p value = 0.001, and n = 86. CDO2, R2 = 0.21, ANOVA p value = 0.003, and n = 80. Exclusion of those patients with HHH therapy did not influence the results
ANOVA, analysis of variance, CBF, cerebral blood flow, CDO2, cerebral delivery of oxygen, CPP, cerebral perfusion pressure, CPPopt, optimal CPP, ∆CPPopt = CPP − CPPopt, HHH, hypervolemia, hypertension, and hemodilution treatment, Rx, pressure reactivity index, pCO2, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, PTT, pulse transit time
Bold indicate statistical significance
Fig. 2CBF and oxygen delivery in relation to clinical outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (a, b). A significant association between the CBF indices/CDO2 indices and clinical outcome was only present in the early phase. For those with unfavorable clinical outcome, global cortical CBF was lower (median 32 [IQR 22–40] vs. 36 [IQR 29–48] mL/100 g/min, p = 0.03) with a higher burden of hypoperfusion (median 21% [IQR 10–48] vs. 10% [IQR 2–20], p = 0.01) and critical hypoperfusion (median 3% [IQR 0–9] vs. 0% [IQR 0–3], p = 0.01). Similarly, those with unfavorable outcome had a lower CDO2 (median 5 [IQR 3–6] vs. 6 [IQR 4–7], p = 0.01) and higher burden of poor CDO2 (median 35 [IQR 25–63] vs. 11 [IQR 3–41], p = 0.02) and severe CDO2 (median 5 [IQR 0–20] vs. 0 [IQR 0–2], p = 0.001). However, no difference was found in the vasospasm phase between unfavorable and favorable outcome regarding CBF indices and CDO2 indices. Circles and stars indicate outliers (1.5–3 IQRs from the end of the box) and extreme outliers (more than 3 IQRs from the box), respectively. CBF, cerebral blood flow, CDO2, cerebral delivery of oxygen, ∆CPPopt, CPP − CPPopt, IQR, interquartile range, CBF, cerebral blood flow, CDO2, cerebral delivery of oxygen, CPP, cerebral perfusion pressure, CPPopt, optimal CPP, HHH, hypervolemia, hypertension, and hemodilution, ICP, intracranial pressure, PRx, pressure reactivity index, PTT, pulse transit time
CBF and CDO2 in the early phase and the vasospasm phase in relation to favorable outcome: multiple logistic outcome regression
| Variables | Early phase (a) | Vasospasm phase (b) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||
| Favorable outcome (1) | ||||
| Age | 1.00 (0.95–1.05) | 0.97 | 1.01 (0.97–1.05) | 0.78 |
| WFNS grade | 0.50 (0.32–0.78) | 0.002a | 0.73 (0.50–1.05) | 0.09 |
| CBF | 1.05 (1.00–1.10) | 0.07 | 1.03 (0.98–1.07) | 0.24 |
| Favorable outcome (2) | ||||
| Age | 1.00 (0.95–1.06) | 0.94 | 1.00 (0.96–1.05) | 0.87 |
| WFNS grade | 0.48 (0.30–0.77) | 0.002a | 0.69 (0.47–1.01) | 0.06 |
| CDO2 | 1.48 (1.05–2.09) | 0.003a | 1.20 (0.87–1.66) | 0.27 |
Early phase, regression (1a) with CBF (Nagelkerke = 0.26, n = 72) and separate regression (2a) with CDO2 (Nagelkerke = 0.31, n = 69)
Vasospasm phase, regression (1b) with CBF (Nagelkerke = 0.07, n = 114) and separate regression (2b) with CDO2 (Nagelkerke = 0.08, n = 106)
CBF, cerebral blood flow; CDO2, cerebral delivery of oxygen; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; WFNS, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies
aStatistical significance