| Literature DB >> 35449032 |
Ricardo Hayashi-Mercado1, Carla Pérez-Montaño2, Jaime Reyes-Sánchez3, Abel Ramírez-Estudillo2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biomarkers hold great promise for personalized medicine as information gained from diagnostic or progression markers can be used to tailor treatment to the individual for highly effective intervention in the disease process.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; OCT; Ranibizumab; nAMD
Year: 2022 PMID: 35449032 PMCID: PMC9022246 DOI: 10.1186/s40942-022-00379-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Retina Vitreous ISSN: 2056-9920
Fig. 1Cross-sectional optical coherence tomography of findings of uncertain significance (yellow arrow). A Onion sign. B Prechoroidal cleft. C Intraretinal pseudocyst. D Subretinal pseudocyst. E Choroidal cavern
Fig. 2Scatter plot of BCVA vs CMT with linear regression. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) with significance (p value) is presented in the boxes
Findings of uncertain significance, age, gender and p value
| Biomarker | Frequency (number of eyes) | Mean age with biomarker | Mean age without biomarker | p value* | Female (%) | Male | p value** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Onion sign | 32 | 76.4 ± 9 | 77.4 ± 8 | 0.58 | 34 | 44.4 | 0.33 |
| Prechoroidal cleft | 18 | 77.3 ± 8 | 77 ± 8 | 0.86 | 29.8 | 11.1 | 0.04 |
| Intraretinal pseudocyst | 32 | 78.9 ± 8 | 75.9 ± 8 | 0.11 | 34 | 44.4 | 0.33 |
| Subretinal pseudocyst | 16 | 76.2 ± 9 | 77.2 ± 8 | 0.65 | 19.2 | 19.4 | 0.97 |
| Choroidal caverns | 17 | 78.2 ± 9 | 76.7 ± 8 | 0.53 | 21.3 | 19.4 | 0.83 |
Comparison between the presence or absence of biomarkers according to age and gender
*Two–samples t-test with equal variance
**Pearson Chi2
Univariate analysis compared BCVA and findings of uncertain significance
| Eyes per group | Mean basal BCVA in ETDRS letters | Mean BCVA after loading dose in ETDRS letters | Difference in ETDRS letters | p value* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without onion sign | 51 | 33.1 | 35.6 | + 2.5 | 0.16 |
| With onion sign | 32 | 24.4 | 30 | + 5.6 | 0.04 |
| Without prechoroidal cleft | 65 | 32.9 | 36.6 | + 3.7 | 0.04 |
| With prechoroidal cleft | 18 | 18.3 | 21.9 | + 3.6 | 0.15 |
| Without intraretinal pseudocyst | 51 | 30.4 | 35.2 | + 4.8 | 0.002 |
| With intraretinal pseudocyst | 32 | 28.8 | 30.6 | + 1.8 | 0.54 |
| Without subretinal pseudocyst | 67 | 31.6 | 36.2 | + 4.6 | 0.005 |
| With subretinal pseudocyst | 16 | 21.9 | 21.9 | 0 | 1.0 |
| Without choroidal caverns | 66 | 31.3 | 35.7 | + 4.4 | 0.0065 |
| With choroidal caverns | 17 | 23.8 | 24.7 | + 0.9 | 0.83 |
*Paired t Student
Univariate analysis compared CMT and findings of uncertain significance
| Eyes per group | Mean basal CMT in μm | Mean CMT after loading dose in μm | Difference in μm | p value* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without onion sign | 51 | 427.9 | 367.9 | −60 | 0.04 |
| With onion sign | 32 | 532.5 | 392.5 | −140 | 0.001 |
| Without prechoroidal cleft | 65 | 469.9 | 390.3 | −79 | 0.005 |
| With prechoroidal cleft | 18 | 462.2 | 330.6 | −132 | 0.01 |
| Without intraretinal pseudocyst | 51 | 483.5 | 392.2 | −91 | 0.01 |
| With intraretinal pseudocyst | 32 | 443.8 | 353.8 | −90 | 0.003 |
| Without subretinal pseudocyst | 67 | 455 | 367.8 | −87 | 0.0015 |
| With subretinal pseudocyst | 16 | 523.6 | 417 | −105 | 0.08 |
| Without choroidal caverns | 66 | 469 | 372 | −97 | 0.0010 |
| With choroidal caverns | 17 | 465 | 398.6 | −66 | 0.10 |
*Paired t Student