Literature DB >> 35446816

Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Potential Transfer to the PICU.

Anoop Mayampurath1, L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto2, Emma Hegermiller1, Amarachi Erondu1, Kyle Carey1, Priti Jani1, Robert Gibbons1, Dana Edelson1, Matthew M Churpek3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Unrecognized clinical deterioration during illness requiring hospitalization is associated with high risk of mortality and long-term morbidity among children. Our objective was to develop and externally validate machine learning algorithms using electronic health records for identifying ICU transfer within 12 hours indicative of a child's condition.
DESIGN: Observational cohort study.
SETTING: Two urban, tertiary-care, academic hospitals (sites 1 and 2). PATIENTS: Pediatric inpatients (age <18 yr).
INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN
RESULTS: Our primary outcome was direct ward to ICU transfer. Using age, vital signs, and laboratory results, we derived logistic regression with regularization, restricted cubic spline regression, random forest, and gradient boosted machine learning models. Among 50,830 admissions at site 1 and 88,970 admissions at site 2, 1,993 (3.92%) and 2,317 (2.60%) experienced the primary outcome, respectively. Site 1 data were split longitudinally into derivation (2009-2017) and validation (2018-2019), whereas site 2 constituted the external test cohort. Across both sites, the gradient boosted machine was the most accurate model and outperformed a modified version of the Bedside Pediatric Early Warning Score that only used physiologic variables in terms of discrimination ( C -statistic site 1: 0.84 vs 0.71, p < 0.001; site 2: 0.80 vs 0.74, p < 0.001), sensitivity, specificity, and number needed to alert.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed and externally validated a novel machine learning model that identifies ICU transfers in hospitalized children more accurately than current tools. Our model enables early detection of children at risk for deterioration, thereby creating opportunities for intervention and improvement in outcomes.
Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35446816      PMCID: PMC9262766          DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.971


  37 in total

Review 1.  Detecting and managing deterioration in children.

Authors:  Alan Monaghan
Journal:  Paediatr Nurs       Date:  2005-02

2.  'The Score Matters': wide variations in predictive performance of 18 paediatric track and trigger systems.

Authors:  Susan M Chapman; Jo Wray; Kate Oulton; Christina Pagel; Samiran Ray; Mark J Peters
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  The value of positive end-expiratory pressure and Fio₂ criteria in the definition of the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Martin Britos; Elizabeth Smoot; Kathleen D Liu; B Taylor Thompson; William Checkley; Roy G Brower
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 4.  Pediatric Oxygen Therapy: A Review and Update.

Authors:  Brian K Walsh; Craig D Smallwood
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.258

5.  Development of heart and respiratory rate percentile curves for hospitalized children.

Authors:  Christopher P Bonafide; Patrick W Brady; Ron Keren; Patrick H Conway; Keith Marsolo; Carrie Daymont
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Multicenter Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Regression for Predicting Clinical Deterioration on the Wards.

Authors:  Matthew M Churpek; Trevor C Yuen; Christopher Winslow; David O Meltzer; Michael W Kattan; Dana P Edelson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Development and validation of a deep-learning-based pediatric early warning system: A single-center study.

Authors:  Seong Jong Park; Kyung-Jae Cho; Oyeon Kwon; Hyunho Park; Yeha Lee; Woo Hyun Shim; Chae Ri Park; Won Kyoung Jhang
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Jérémie F Cohen; Daniël A Korevaar; Douglas G Altman; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Lotty Hooft; Les Irwig; Deborah Levine; Johannes B Reitsma; Henrica C W de Vet; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Paediatric early warning systems for detecting and responding to clinical deterioration in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Veronica Lambert; Anne Matthews; Rachel MacDonell; John Fitzsimons
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Risk stratification to improve Pediatric Early Warning Systems: it is all about the context.

Authors:  Lara Teheux; Carin W Verlaat; Joris Lemson; Jos M T Draaisma; Joris Fuijkschot
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.