OBJECTIVES: The criteria that define acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome include PaO₂/Fio₂ but not positive end-expiratory pressure or Fio2. PaO2/Fio2 ratios of some patients increase substantially after mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure of 5-10 cm H₂O, and the mortality of these patients may be lower than those whose PaO₂/Fio₂ratios remain <200. Also, PaO₂/Fio₂ may increase when Fio2 is raised from moderate to high levels, suggesting that patients with similar PaO₂/Fio₂ ratios but different Fio₂ levels have different risks of mortality. The primary purpose of this study was to assess the value of adding baseline positive end-expiratory pressure and Fio₂ to PaO₂/Fio₂ for predicting mortality of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients enrolled in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network clinical trials. We also assessed effects of two study interventions on clinical outcomes in subsets of patients with mild and severe hypoxemia as defined by PaO₂/Fio₂. DESIGN: Analysis of baseline physiologic data and outcomes of patients previously enrolled in clinical trials conducted by the National Institutes of Health Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. SETTING: Intensive care units of 40 hospitals in North America. PATIENTS: Two thousand three hundred and twelve patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Only 1.3% of patients enrolled in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network trials had baseline positive end-expiratory pressure < 5 cm H₂O, and 50% had baseline positive end-expiratory pressure ≥10 cm H₂O. Baseline PaO₂/Fio₂ predicted mortality, but after controlling for PaO₂/Fio₂, baseline positive end-expiratory pressure did not predict mortality. In contrast, after controlling for baseline PaO₂/Fio₂, baseline Fio₂ did predict mortality. Effects of two study interventions (lower tidal volumes and fluid-conservative hemodynamic management) were similar in mild and severe hypoxemia subsets as defined by PaO₂/Fio₂ ratios. CONCLUSION: At Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network hospitals, the addition of baseline positive end-expiratory pressure would not have increased the value of PaO₂/Fio₂ for predicting mortality of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. In contrast, the addition of baseline Fio2 to PaO₂/Fio₂ could be used to identify subsets of patients with low or high mortality.
OBJECTIVES: The criteria that define acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome include PaO₂/Fio₂ but not positive end-expiratory pressure or Fio2. PaO2/Fio2 ratios of some patients increase substantially after mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure of 5-10 cm H₂O, and the mortality of these patients may be lower than those whose PaO₂/Fio₂ratios remain <200. Also, PaO₂/Fio₂ may increase when Fio2 is raised from moderate to high levels, suggesting that patients with similar PaO₂/Fio₂ ratios but different Fio₂ levels have different risks of mortality. The primary purpose of this study was to assess the value of adding baseline positive end-expiratory pressure and Fio₂ to PaO₂/Fio₂ for predicting mortality of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndromepatients enrolled in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network clinical trials. We also assessed effects of two study interventions on clinical outcomes in subsets of patients with mild and severe hypoxemia as defined by PaO₂/Fio₂. DESIGN: Analysis of baseline physiologic data and outcomes of patients previously enrolled in clinical trials conducted by the National Institutes of Health Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. SETTING: Intensive care units of 40 hospitals in North America. PATIENTS: Two thousand three hundred and twelve patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Only 1.3% of patients enrolled in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network trials had baseline positive end-expiratory pressure < 5 cm H₂O, and 50% had baseline positive end-expiratory pressure ≥10 cm H₂O. Baseline PaO₂/Fio₂ predicted mortality, but after controlling for PaO₂/Fio₂, baseline positive end-expiratory pressure did not predict mortality. In contrast, after controlling for baseline PaO₂/Fio₂, baseline Fio₂ did predict mortality. Effects of two study interventions (lower tidal volumes and fluid-conservative hemodynamic management) were similar in mild and severe hypoxemia subsets as defined by PaO₂/Fio₂ ratios. CONCLUSION: At Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network hospitals, the addition of baseline positive end-expiratory pressure would not have increased the value of PaO₂/Fio₂ for predicting mortality of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndromepatients. In contrast, the addition of baseline Fio2 to PaO₂/Fio₂ could be used to identify subsets of patients with low or high mortality.
Authors: A Esteban; A Anzueto; I Alía; F Gordo; C Apezteguía; F Pálizas; D Cide; R Goldwaser; L Soto; G Bugedo; C Rodrigo; J Pimentel; G Raimondi; M J Tobin Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: L Gattinoni; G Tognoni; A Pesenti; P Taccone; D Mascheroni; V Labarta; R Malacrida; P Di Giulio; R Fumagalli; P Pelosi; L Brazzi; R Latini Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-08-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrés Esteban; Antonio Anzueto; Fernando Frutos; Inmaculada Alía; Laurent Brochard; Thomas E Stewart; Salvador Benito; Scott K Epstein; Carlos Apezteguía; Peter Nightingale; Alejandro C Arroliga; Martin J Tobin Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-01-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Roy G Brower; Michael A Matthay; Alan Morris; David Schoenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Arthur Wheeler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-05-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Philipp G H Metnitz; Barbara Metnitz; Rui P Moreno; Peter Bauer; Lorenzo Del Sorbo; Christoph Hoermann; Susana Afonso de Carvalho; V Marco Ranieri Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-03-14 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Antonio Anzueto; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Andres Esteban; Inmaculada Alía; Laurent Brochard; Thomas Stewart; Salvador Benito; Martin J Tobin; Jose Elizalde; Fernando Palizas; Cide M David; Jorge Pimentel; Marco González; Luis Soto; Gabriel D'Empaire; Paolo Pelosi Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-02-28 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: R Hernu; F Wallet; F Thiollière; O Martin; J C Richard; Z Schmitt; G Wallon; B Delannoy; T Rimmelé; C Démaret; C Magnin; H Vallin; A Lepape; L Baboi; L Argaud; V Piriou; B Allaouchiche; F Aubrun; O Bastien; J J Lehot; L Ayzac; C Guérin Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Imoigele P Aisiku; Jose-Miguel Yamal; Pratik Doshi; Maria Laura Rubin; Julia S Benoit; Julia Hannay; Barbara C Tilley; Shankar Gopinath; Claudia S Robertson Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Niall D Ferguson; Eddy Fan; Luigi Camporota; Massimo Antonelli; Antonio Anzueto; Richard Beale; Laurent Brochard; Roy Brower; Andrés Esteban; Luciano Gattinoni; Andrew Rhodes; Arthur S Slutsky; Jean-Louis Vincent; Gordon D Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; V Marco Ranieri Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-08-25 Impact factor: 17.440